News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Support Joe's Work

Subscribe

Help support Joe's work

Choose an amount

HUGE EXCLUSIVE: Plan in the Works to Avert a 2026 Election Disaster

EXCLUSIVE: A Plan Is in the Works to Avert a 2026 Election Disaster.

A two-prong strategy is in the works to avert a 2026 Election Disaster.  This plan took years of planning and lots of work to get to this point.  The plan includes these two steps:

1) The first step is to sue the states over NVRA Violations

ADVERTISEMENT

2) The second step is to offer a reasonable path forward with an emergency order

Over the past six years, Unite4Freedom has put together a team of experts to review election records in key states.  Here is what they did with their results after years of research and planning.

Unite4Freedom has sent a Notice of Evidence Preservation Obligations to 35 state Governors, Attorneys General, and Secretaries of State. These letters were sent out between September 2 and 3, in advance of the expiration of the 22-month record retention requirement for 2024 general election records, and are connected to the Notice of Violations regarding compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), 52 U.S.C. § 20501, that have been transmitted to 30 states.

The letters sent by Unite4Freedom are a formal demand that the states immediately take all steps necessary to identify, preserve, and protect from destruction, alteration, or loss any and all records, documents, communications, and data that relate in any way to the subject matter of the Notice of Violations and their compliance with the National Voter Registration Act (52 U.S.C. § 20501), the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) (52 U.S.C. § 20901), and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) (52 U.S.C. § 10101).

The letters also serve as formal notice that Unite4Freedom intends to commence civil action against the states if the violations identified in the Notices are not fully remedied within the time period outlined in NVRA—90 days after a State receives written notice of the violation, or within 20 days after receipt of such notice if the violation occurred within 120 days before the date of an election for Federal office. (52 U.S.C. § 20510(b)(2)).

(Here is an example of the letter sent to the states, this was sent to California: CA_NVRA-Evidence-Preservation-Letter)

In California, this letter was sent to the leaders in the state, including Governor Newsom, Secretary of State Weber, and Attorney General Bonta.

ADVERTISEMENT

This letter and similar letters to 34 other states allowed for the states to correct the election issues identified within 20 days.  If the issues aren’t addressed, Unite4Freedom said it intended to sue.

Below is a report on the aggregate results for the 35 states addressed, along with a list of the states included in this exercise.  There were over 23 million election issues, with 5 million election errors identified in California alone.

Harry Haury from Unite4Freedom shared:

“We have earned standing as the states have failed to address or cure our complaint.  We have the data, we have the predicate, we have standing, and this plan can work without a pause……..”

These lawsuits will allow President Trump to take strong action

The first lawsuit was filed in Pennsylvania.  Unite4Freedom is working on lawsuits in New York, Illinois, California, Texas, Colorado, Michigan, and Georgia next.

Haury shares:

ADVERTISEMENT

“The litigation can succeed by itself.  But with direct intervention by the DOJ, an Executive Order, or a Presidential Emergency Order the effort has the best chance of success.  We hope this process averts any street violence, or worse.  The reason is that the litigation forces the data into the public realm and it directly supports any orders.  This effort basically forces:

1) immediate audit of the voter rolls against federal databases,

2) not counting any ballot, in-person or mail-in, to be counted until the person voting is proven to be an eligible U.S. citizen,

3) stop using any machines that have not been properly certified and tested,

4) implement a post election full random statistical audit of sufficient escalating strength to prove the proper candidate won, this is not the ridiculous fraud of a “risk limiting audit” but much more oriented towards true transparency and verifiability.

Steps 1, 2, and 3, are minimally disruptive and arguably are already required per the law. Step 4 – true randomized audits – should satisfy all parties on a non-partisan basis.

(A large number of people outside of Unite4Freedom, including Greg Stenstrom and others, are involved in this effort.  To truly and effectively litigate this, Unite4Freedom also needs funding.  Go to their website Unite4Freedom to see how you can help.)