Unite4Freedom Files Federal Complaint in Pennsylvania Seeking Clarification of Election Law Requirements
DATE: April 15, 2026
Unite4Freedom today announced the filing of a complaint in federal court in Pennsylvania seeking a declaratory judgment on the scope and enforcement of federal election statutes governing recordkeeping, transparency, and verification of election results.
Unite4Freedom Chairman and Founder Harry Haury stated:
“Federal election law sets clear requirements for record preservation, transparency, and auditability. This case asks the Court to interpret those requirements and confirm whether they must be followed as written. The objective is straightforward: clarity in the law and compliance going forward.”
The complaint does not seek to challenge or overturn any past election. Instead, it asks the Court to determine whether federal law requires Pennsylvania to verify election results through preserved records and reconciliation of election inputs, records, and outputs—and, if so, to require prospective compliance with those statutory obligations.
At issue is whether certification of federal election results is lawful when underlying records are incomplete, unreconciled, or insufficient to reconstruct the election as required by federal law.
Data Demonstrates Distressing Concerns
Grounded in Unite4Freedom’s expert data analysis of Pennsylvania’s own official records, NOT speculation or external assumptions, the complaint seeks to evaluate whether federal statutory requirements have been met.
Voter Registration Disaster
The National Voter Registration Act requires states to maintain accurate voter records, yet Unite4Freedom analyses identified millions of voter registration violations prohibited by state and federal law in the 2022 and 2024 elections. What is worse, is that over one million registrants with legal violations were allowed to vote in both 2022 and 2024.
The Number of Ballots and Voters Are Not Equal
In 2024, official totals show Pennsylvania certified an election with 12,822 FEWER ballots counted than voters recorded as having voted, and in 2022 it was the opposite with 9,153 MORE ballots counted than voters.
Vote-to-voter discrepancies strike at the core of certification. If ballots counted do not match voters who voted, the tally cannot be presumed accurate.
Tampering with Results
Unite4Freedom comparisons of snapshots of official state databases from certified election records revealed significant changes—both additions and deletions—to individual voter participation histories.
• 2,039,593 changes in the 2024 General Election over two comparisons
• 259,219 changes in the 2022 General Election over two comparisons
• 385,122 changes in the 2022 General Election over two comparisons
These snapshots are auditable records and should not change after certification, but voters disappeared by the thousands while others were added. Each instance documents modifications to official federal records AFTER final certification of the election.
If the vote tallies were not accurate, why were the elections certified? If the tallies were accurate when certified, why did they change? There is no other option.
Determining Legal Compliance
The complaint identifies several federal requirements that are expressed in mandatory terms and therefore impose binding legal obligations on state officials.
The Court is asked to determine:
Whether federal election statutes impose mandatory duties on state officials to maintain and preserve records sufficient to reconstruct federal elections;
Whether those statutes require reconciliation between voter registration records, ballots cast, and certified results;
Whether certification of election results without such reconciliation, where discrepancies exist or required records are absent, is unlawful as a matter of law.
Where Congress has used mandatory statutory language, compliance is not discretionary. The complaint asserts that failure to meet these requirements—particularly where records cannot be reconciled—renders certification legally deficient.
U.S. federal elections laws were passed to ensure accuracy, protect voters rights and govern election systems’ operation. If these laws are not followed, why should citizens trust that election results are accurate and that their right to legitimate representation is being rendered? Only transparency, honesty, and lawful elections will restore trust and accountability.
