Oklahoma Is The Latest State To Have Suspected Vote Tampering Exposed By Unite4Freedom
Unite4Freedom’s Vote Tampering Report for Oklahoma’s 2020, 2022 and 2024 general elections, highlights post-certification record changes similar to those identified in at least ten other states. These reports compare multiple snapshots of voter participation data from certified election results AFTER certification and show the following:
- Vote histories deleted after election
- Vote histories added after election
- Voter and their history deleted after initially being recorded
- Voter and participation added after the election
Each time-stamped snapshot of government election records analyzed Oklahoma’s official record of who voted and when they voted—not how they voted. These records are required to be preserved and maintained as part of the official election record.
Across two comparisons of Oklahoma’s official records, there were:
- 24,112 total changes in 2024
- 19,960 total changes in 2022
- 28,168 total changes in 2020
Why Do These Changes Matter?
Election certification is a legal attestation that the outcome of an election is accurate and true. How were the elections certified as accurate if the records used to certify them were later altered? If changes to voters’ participation histories are being made after the election was certified, how do we know which record of the election is the true outcome? Where are the records that explain why the changes were made and under what authority? And why are records continuing to change so long after election certification? U4F has discovered that this pattern is repeating across the country.
Federal Elections Must Follow Federal Law?
In the administration of federal elections, every state is required to adhere to the requirements enacted by Congress in the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), and the Voting Rights Act. While U4F does not claim that every suspected record change identified in these reports establishes a violation of federal law, these matters do require investigation, explanation, and documentation sufficient to determine what happened in an election and whether applicable legal requirements were followed.
The records should show when voter registrations were created, changed, transferred, or cancelled; when voter-history information changed and why; who or what system was authorized to make changes; and whether required list-maintenance procedures were followed.
Restoring Trust in the Process Awarding Power
Our constitutional system asks Americans with profoundly different beliefs to resolve their differences peacefully through the ballot box. Yet, only 34% of U.S. adults trust government certifications of election results “a great deal” or “quite a bit.”* For our system to endure and prosper, Americans must have confidence that our votes matter and that the certified outcome and records accurately demonstrate the will of the people. Americans are not required to trust the outcome without transparency and provable results.
Questions about elections are often treated as partisan accusations. Instead, election questions should be seen as a desire to see the proof from records, evidence, and the law—that is the transparency the American people deserve. America must change the trajectory of election trust or risk deeper animosity, greater division, and declining confidence in our representative government.
“Valid elections are guaranteed in the Constitution and are the foundation of our Republic,“ says U4F Chairman Harry Haury. “Citizens have a right to demand accuracy. If elections are not accurate, then who is ultimately selecting our representatives?”
Beyond Oklahoma
Vote Tampering Reports are part of a Unite4Freedom national effort to examine election records maintained by state election officials across the country. Ours analysis of official records in 35 states identifying apparent violations of election law are summarized in our State Election Validity Scorecards. In addition to apparent violations in registration and voting, these reports demonstrate that there is not one state where the certified election tally (ballots counted) matches the number of voters recorded as having voted in the election.
Our research has been used in multiple federal lawsuits, NVRA Notices, HAVA Complaints, and additional legal actions. U4F will continue to pursue transparency and legitimacy in elections.
Contact [email protected] for comment or media appearances.
Additional state reports are available at Unite4Freedom.com/reports.