The Mueller team is being called on their bluff. They produced a list of Russians and Russian companies in February who they said impacted the US election. One of the companies, Concord Management, is requesting the information Mueller used to create the indictments. Mueller and his Clinton Foundation attorney Jeannie Rhee never expected this!
On Friday, Mueller’s prosecutors disclosed that Concord’s attorneys, Eric Dubelier and Kate Seikaly, had made a slew of discovery requests demanding nonpublic details about the case and the investigation. Prosecutors also asked a judge to postpone the formal arraignment of Concord Management set for next week.
The prosecution team sought the delay on the grounds that it’s unclear whether Concord Management formally accepted the court summons related to the case. Mueller’s prosecutors also revealed that they tried to deliver the summonses for Concord and IRA through the Russian government, without success.
Corrupt Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced on February 16, 2017, that his counterparts in the corrupt Mueller team had indicted 13 Russian individuals and three Russian companies for scheme to interfere in the US political system.
The Mueller team later released information on the companies and individuals indicted including information on the activities they participated in during the 2016 Presidential election. The Mueller team accused the Russians of “supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump … and disparaging Hillary Clinton.”
But this was another far left liberal lie. TGP reported that of the events promoted by these Russians, a total of 31 people attended the Trump rallies while the Hillary rallies promoted by these Russians brought in 10,100 people including big leftist Michael Moore.
Last week it was time for the accused Russians to call the Mueller team on its bluff. One Twitter account reported the facts related to the Concord Management case. Techno Frog noted that the federal judge denied Mueller’s request to delay the upcoming arraignment.
Today (5/5/2018), a federal magistrate denied Mueller’s request to continue the May 9, 2018 initial appearance and arraignment.
Let’s look at the motions… pic.twitter.com/4XMeO2dtO5
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
Next Techno Frog tweeted that the defendants of Concord demanded information from the Special Counsel –
On 4/11/2018, counsel entered appearances on behalf of Defendant Concord. That same day, they demanded information from the Special Counsel – including details of surveillance and names of witnesses. pic.twitter.com/R09g9H1aGG
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
Techno called then noted that Mueller’s team responded in a manner that did not comply with a legal statute –
4/20/2018: the Special Counsel responded, asking if they were authorized to receive service on behalf of Concord.
Concord answered the Special Counsel: “Since your communication to me of the attached summons does not comply with FRCrP 4, I am returning it to you.”
lol. pic.twitter.com/E9ReYpUwJt
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
Next the Special Counsel asked the court is Concord was properly served.
The Special Counsel continued, asking the Court to determine if Concord was properly served. pic.twitter.com/EXb05hXWpt
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
Next Techno Frog notes that the attorney on Mueller’s team, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation in prior litigation –
Subplot: The motion was signed by Jeannie Rhee.
Who is Jeannie Rhee? She represented the Clinton Foundation in prior litigation and, as documented in this thread, lied to the court in that case:https://t.co/Jonny9rL51 pic.twitter.com/9vXsnQF27S
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
Techno Frog then noted that Concord’s legal team is not afraid to fire shots at the Mueller team –
Concord’s response is highly enjoyable, firing shots in the first paragraph:
“The Special Counsel is not entitled to special rules.” pic.twitter.com/zKM4IkZaO4
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
The Concord team noted to the court that the Special Counsel ignored Concord’s previous emails –
Concord also illustrates to the court that the Special Counsel ignored FRCrP 4 by sending summons w/o advanced consultation; and had no obligation to answer the Special Counsel’s interrogatories. pic.twitter.com/4FozSjHnK1
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
Finally, Techno Frog notes that the Concord team has asked for discovery and documents from the Special Counsel and has not even replied let alone provide the data requested –
Concord reminded the court it is entitled to a speedy trial.
Finally, it also noted that Concord sought discovery/documents from the Special Counsel and “the Special Counsel has not extended to common courtesy” of providing a reply.
Please let this go to trial. pic.twitter.com/W2eG3oKau5
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 6, 2018
Techno Frog and all Americans want the Special Counsel to be held to the standards that all attorneys should be held to in the least.