News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Support Joe's Work

Subscribe

Help support Joe's work

Choose an amount

Did Judge Barrett Confuse Tina Peters with Hillary Clinton and Jena Griswold?

Did Judge Barrett Confuse Tina Peters with Hillary Clinton and Jena Griswold?

Guest Post by Martel Maxim

During the sentencing of Tina Peters on 3 Oct 2024, Judge Barrett was apparently confused about who he was addressing when he said the following to Tina:  “you cannot help but lie as easy as it is for you to breathe”

ADVERTISEMENT

These delusional and uninformed words were totally out of line.  It’s as if Judge Barrett believed Tina was Hillary/Bill Clinton addressing their association with Jeffrey Epstein.   Here are a few memorable Hillary moments if you haven’t seen them yet:  HILLARY-1  HILLARY-2

Additionally, Judge Barrett’s statements are like he listened to Colorado SOS Jena Griswold make the following recent MISLEADING STATEMENTS (lies) about having argued at the US Supreme Court.

ADVERTISEMENT

Because Judge Barrett’s delusion was apparently so strong and biased against Tina, he intentionally railroaded Tina into a 9-year sentence and manipulated the “Jury of her Peers” in order to find her guilty at all costs.

This shows that Tina was tried by a Kangaroo Stalin Court which was under orders to find her guilty on as many counts as possible in order to shut her up from inspiring other Election Officials/Voters from questioning election results ever again.  If this is the what happened, then Judge Barrett didn’t confuse Tina with anyone, and knew exactly what he was saying during his distorted dystopian sentencing.  His sentencing also reflected his notable biases during her trial (like not allowing her to present exculpatory evidence, have meaningful witnesses testify on her behalf, violating her Constitutional right of Free Speech etc.).  Visit Tina’s website https://tinapeters.us/ for all the background information.

Augmenting this saga is the recent bizarre case of former Colorado Democrat State Senator Sonya Lewis who skated free of any prison time for crimes similar to those that Tina which was falsely incarcerated for.  The specific charge being “Influencing a Public Official”, with Sonya drawing a mere 150 hours of public service time vs. Tina’s lengthy prison sentence on similar counts.

That disparity in sentencing even got the attention of CO Governor Polis, who commented there’s a great inconsistency in the sentencing regarding comparable charges.  You can read a summary about that HERE.

ADVERTISEMENT

But wouldn’t you know it, however, the day after Gov Polis expressed his consideration about clemency for Tina, he suddenly introduced the condition that she needed to express remorse for her actions.  Gov. Polis might not know Tina had been offered many opportunities since 2021 to make similar statements, and of course, she declined all those opportunities with strength equivalent to the resolve of Nathan Hale, who is remembered as having said: “I regret that I have but one life to lose for my Country“.  As President Trump said during his recent State of the Union Address, “the revolution that began in 1776 has not ended”.

So where does all this lead?

As the information warfare continues to obscure the computerized election machine fraud exposed by Tina Peters, it’s likely that the Deep State is currently hard at work, actively war-gaming possible Midterm strategies for success.  If the Save America Act passes, or President Trump’s next election-related Executive Order (E.O.) takes effect, they’ll lose their “Cheating 1.0” capabilities that have served them so well since the early 2000s.

If/when the Deep State loses the Midterms, all who played significant parts in the overthrow of America in 2020 (and other elections) will hopefully be held accountable.  If by chance the Deep State somehow ‘wins’ the Midterms, the resultant abuse done to American Citizens during the Biden years will look like Kindergarten.

To meet these challenges head-on leading up to the Midterms, a “MAGA 2.0” force of nature needs to coalesce and combat the only weapon the Deep State will have left to steal that election.  That weapon is “Disinformation” on steroids.  Already, the Deep State has done some notable damage to some “MAGA 1.0” Grassroots influencers via hypnotizing them with propaganda, causing some of them to suddenly jump ship, especially in light of the recent Iran and Venezuela operations;  or at least that’s their excuse.  Just think how these and other “Sleeper Influencers” will react if the Deep State manages to pull off a major/somewhat believable ‘False Flag’ in order to further damage MAGA?

Unfortunately, some previously relevant followers of these Influencers have also been drawn into believing the Deep State’s Disinformation, and are now attempting to take the wind out of the MAGA sails through their misguided attacks, largely shrouded in statements of disappointment.  This campaign is reminiscent of the intentions behind WW2’s Axis Sally.

We’ll explore possible scenarios in a future article to combat this unfolding scheme.  If the Deep State is allowed to succeed in negating the “too big to rig” concept via disinformation that disillusions the MAGA base, that war won’t even require election rigging in the final analysis.  What tipped off Tina regarding her stolen 2021 Grand Junction Municipal Election and 2020 was the very successful MAGA 1.0 thinking, which was grounded in common sense, tempered by trust.  HOWEVER, “Deep State 2.0” is already here and operating in the shadows.

We MUST therefore immediately build a MAGA 2.0 Coalition of the serious to crush Deep State 2.0 prior to, and during the Midterms.  The future of America and the World depends upon this.