Democrat State Officials Refusing to Assist with President Trump’s Voter Fraud Investigation | Joe Hoft


Get The Latest


Get The Latest

Democrat State Officials Refusing to Assist with President Trump’s Voter Fraud Investigation

Democrat state officials in various states across the union are refusing to assist President Trump in his voter fraud investigation. Democrat politicians from California, Connecticut, Virginia and even Kentucky are not assisting in the President’s efforts to ensure US elections are fraud free:

Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill said in a statement that her office would provide such information “in the spirit of transparency.” But, suggesting some of the requested data would not be sharable under state law, she said she would ensure “the privacy of voters is honored by withholding protected data.” Merrill also voiced concern that state officials “have not been told precisely what the Commission is looking for.”

Virginia and California were more brazen in their response.

McAuliffe, a former Democratic National Committee chairman and longtime Clinton family ally, said, “At best this commission was set up as a pretext to validate Donald Trump’s alternative election facts, and at worst is a tool to commit large-scale voter suppression.”

The governor declared he would not “divert resources” to this.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla struck a similar chord, saying in a statement he would “not provide sensitive voter information to a commission that has already inaccurately passed judgment that millions of Californians voted illegally.”

He added, “California’s participation would only serve to legitimize the false and already debunked claims of massive voter fraud made by the President, the Vice President, and Mr. Kobach.”

Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes – a Democratic official in a state with a Republican governor – also said she does “not intend to release Kentuckians’ sensitive personal data to the federal government.”

“Kentucky will not aid a commission that is at best a waste of taxpayer money and at worst an attempt to legitimize voter suppression efforts across the country,” she said in a statement.

The officials preventing the President from ensuring the integrity of the election are no doubt the same individuals who claim the President’s accusations of voter fraud are not true.

The Gateway Pundit reported that in Detroit, Michigan, 37% of the precincts had fraudulent voting practices which were uncovered during Hillary Clinton’s recounts requested by Jill Stein. We also reported on a massive voter fraud incident in Nevada where half of the 19,000 votes in one district alone were determined to be fraudulent. Other instances in Detroit were identified during the recounts.

A study from the state of Kansas also found that there are over 7 million voter registrations that appear in two states simultaneously.

The states not providing for the President’s review are most likely guilty of allowing individuals to vote who are not eligible (e.g. illegal aliens, dead people, felons, or people from other states) or guilty of providing for other forms of Democrat voter fraud.


Leave a Comment