News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Support Joe's Work

Subscribe

Help support Joe's work

Choose an amount

Tech Giant Calls AbleChild “Dangerous,” Punishes Joe Hoft

Tech Giant Calls AbleChild “Dangerous,” Punishes Joe Hoft

Republished with permission from AbleChild. 

Google just branded AbleChild’s reporting “dangerous” and quietly cut off ad revenue to JoeHoft.com related to the article, without the basic courage to ask a single question of the organization whose work it targeted. AbleChild received no warnings. This was not a dispute over facts, corrections, or sourcing. It was a one‑sided financial execution of an investigative story that dared to follow the Medicaid money in Minnesota and name the powerful behavioral‑health interests standing to lose from real scrutiny.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joe Hoft is not just another voice online; it is deeply ironic that he happens to hold multiple degrees as a corporate auditor in the United States and has worked in China & multiple countries, bringing international auditing experience to his reporting. That background makes this audit story even more important, because Hoft actually knows a little something about audits and how financial systems can be gamed from the inside.

AbleChild’s Minnesota investigation is straight investigative journalism: it tracks how three dominant behavioral providers helped shape Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention rules, how those rules created loopholes and shielded established players, and how a $2.3 million AI “audit” contract looks more like political cover than real oversight. It raises uncomfortable questions about whether the tools sold as fraud detection are instead locking in protections for insiders while federal prosecutors chase smaller operators for a fraction of the total scheme. Nothing about that work fits any honest definition of incitement or hate. It is dangerous only to those whose contracts, careers, and reputations rest on keeping the public ignorant of how the system really works.

By slapping a “dangerous or derogatory” label on Joe Hoft’s platform at the URL carrying AbleChild’s exposé, Google didn’t just hit one site’s bottom line; it weaponized its dominance over digital advertising to punish a journalist, an author, and a podcast commentator with hard auditing credentials for using precisely those skills on a politically sensitive Medicaid scandal. The company never reached out to AbleChild to request documentation, never flagged a specific sentence, never invited a response from the author—just a silent algorithmic verdict that stripped revenue and smeared the work. In any other context, branding lawful investigative reporting “dangerous” with no notice or explanation would be recognized for what it is: a defamatory act of raw power.

The warning shot is unmistakable. If a nonprofit watchdog and a credentialed commentator can be financially throttled for exposing how behavioral‑health corporations, consultants, and politicians engineered a billion‑dollar environment ripe for fraud, then every smaller outlet has been told exactly where the red lines are. You can talk about “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the abstract all day long. But if you connect the dots from specific providers to specific contracts to specific failures of oversight, the world’s largest advertising gatekeeper may quietly choke off your livelihood and call you the danger.

ADVERTISEMENT

The real danger is not AbleChild’s story or Joe Hoft’s decision to publish it. The real danger is a system in which children’s diagnoses are monetized, oversight is outsourced to entities with skin in the game, and a handful of tech and health‑industry giants can decide—without debate, transparency, or accountability—which investigations are allowed to be seen and which will be starved into silence.

Be the Voice for the Voiceless

AbleChild is a 501(3) C nonprofit organization that has recently co-written landmark legislation in Tennessee, setting a national precedent for transparency and accountability in the intersection of mental health, pharmaceutical practices, and public safety.

What you can do.  Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!

Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive.  As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.

83 thoughts on “Tech Giant Calls AbleChild “Dangerous,” Punishes Joe Hoft”

  1. Old media is owned by big pharma.Count the ads and see if that even seems to add up or is it a strait out bribe?

    Big tech social media is the new media and we all know the same players are trying to figure out work around to achieve the same end results as they had with old media.

  2. The warning shot is unmistakable.

    This isn't a warning shot. It is a shot aimed to injure if not kill. If at all possible, sue the ever living tar outa the Goggle.

    • That's what I think. Google needs to PROVE that they are dangerous and why not just randomly slander them because they don't agree. Sounds like a Democrat(s) is behind this for sure.

  3. Meh every "news" outlet is just pushing narratives now… no accountability anywhere but they need to keep up the pretense of being "for the tax paying man"… nothing but inbred clowns preventing accountability everywhere!

    • That’s why they never give clear and concise reasons for demonetizing or pulling videos. You can never nail down a moving target. If they fit with Google’d politics, there never see,s to be an issue, but cross that line and weird things start happening.

  4. Why would google even give a rat's a$$ about anything AbleChild would do ? What this tells me is the data got a little too close someone important who made a phone call to someone at Google. That is what this says to me. It would also indicate the reporting is right on target and Trump and team need to be made aware of it.

    • I was thinking the same thing…why would a "tech giant" care about AbleChild at all? All of a sudden, Google feels it has to "protect" society from a group trying to protect children? WTF? After they spent decades pimping for Obama & Biden & any CommieDem who breathes?
      I say we look into Google to see why they are suddenly offended by AbleChild….where there's smoke….. there's Dems playing with matches!

      • It is strange. Someone big must have felt threatened by the AbleChild piece. Will have to go back and look at it more closely.

  5. Google monopolizes the internet.. it needs to be broken up and have a Government watch dog added that will hold them accountable for there tyrannical actions.. Maybe instead of fines. Prison time would be better to show that these elitists who believe themselves to be more powerful then the President and US Government.. ARENT above the Laws.. no matter how much money they have

  6. So it's a freedom of the press civil rights suit. Right? Nothing like owning a slice of google. 10% should give you plenty of relief.

  7. Somebody's well-connected ox was getting gored when the truth comes out.
    As an aside, there are certain very large insurance companies in MN.

  8. zuckerbucks does not give one crap about this country. He sold his soul and google to the chinese communist in its early days when the communist banned it. You can be sure that he was on his knees with his lips puckered before they let google into their communist utopia.

  9. Everyone complains about Google but they don't do anything about it.

    Boycott Google. No Chrome, no Android, no Gmail, nothing. Don't use it, and it will go away.

  10. All democrats always support, endorse, and advocate censoring everyone who isn't a democrat.

  11. Joe Hoft won't let me post my opinion on numerous subjects and has censored my speech over fifty percent of the time.

    Joe Hoft doesn't have the decency to allow a war veteran to post valid opinions to call out actions of this president that are contrary to his campaign speeches.

    Why won't Joe Hoft allow my speech? He constantly complains about his speech being censored while censoring mine.

    Wake up folks… These Hoft boys are right path Freemasons fighting a bloody war against the left hand path of Freemasonry for control of the future of this planet and all who abide here.

    The fake GP(traitors) have no position to argue against the censorship of their trash because they censor more than anyone else hauling all the MAGA garbage that was all a lie.

    "I don't want your support anymore is you want the Epstein files released" says the orange man.

    What is there not to understand about the right path Freemasons. War Veterans see these pieces of garb clearly and will never back down from or look the other way.

    • Part of the first Ammendment is "Freedom of the Press". A free press is not forced to piblish your or anyone else's comments on their own news site.

      Most left-leaning news sites disabled comments years ago. Here there is no viewpoint censorship, only dirty/naughty word filtering.

      • It’s illegal for a pubic facing institution to censor speech PERIOD!!!

        ITS AGAINST TYE CONSTITUTION… it’s a no brainer.

        No one has the right to censor speech in any form.

        Your argument is unconstitutional. War Veterans will defend the rights of the people given to us by the Constitution.

  12. Sue them. You're over the target Mr. Hoft.
    Once upon a time, there were laws in this country regarding monopolies.
    What the hell happened?

  13. Does Hoft know his website was blacklisted at Google for a week ? Probably not. Had to go Duck , Duck to source the site.

    This is what happens when you get close to exposing the control system that runs the lives of every American. How dare Ablechild expose intelligence grift money!

  14. GOOGLE engages in student data sell off$ to the highest bidders. They shouldn't be the default sign-in for classes. What a scam.

  15. is Google, as an AI provider, involved at all in the "$2.3 million AI audit contract"? While some smaller company may be providing the AI audit tools, they generally use large AI cloud datacenter providers on which to run their models.

  16. After seeing Hofts article praising Israel as hero country and necessary for the USA

    I no longer trust him or am outraged for him any linget

  17. Anyone that tells a child they are evil based on their skin color or their sex ought to be kept far far away from children. And they should never be allowed to invade America.

Comments are closed.