News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Support Joe's Work

Subscribe

Help support Joe's work

Choose an amount

YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS UP: Comey’s Attorneys Reportedly Provide Doctored Transcripts in His Perjury Trial

You can’t make this up – Jim Comey’s attorneys reportedly doctored transcripts when providing documents in his perjury trial.

Paul Sperry shared some observations on the documents that Comey provided to the courts in his perjury case.  One observation is shocking.  According to Sperry, when presenting evidence in a motion to the court as part of his perjury defense, James Comey’s legal team altered two words in a transcript of his 2020 Senate testimony to make it seem as if Sen. Ted Cruz asked Comey a key question he didn’t actually ask him during the hearing.  YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS STUFF UP.

ADVERTISEMENT

The following question was asked of Duck.ai about what happened:

Can a defendant alter words in a transcript he presents as evidence in a trial?

The answer is:

No, a defendant cannot alter words in a transcript that is presented as evidence in a trial. Transcripts are official records that accurately capture what was said during legal proceedings. Altering them would be considered fraud and could lead to serious legal consequences, including charges of contempt of court or tampering with evidence.

Not so good for Comey.

His “super” attorneys also reportedly used a movie to support their argument in Comey’s case.

ADVERTISEMENT

In their defense, Comey and his friend claimed they did nothing wrong, but they hid their identities in doing it.

In addition, in Comey’s effort to claim vindictive prosecution, Comey’s attorneys have to do much more than they have to date.

It looks like Comey’s associates, accomplices, and attorneys will fabricate anything and insert it into the court documents to make their point.  Not good.

226 thoughts on “YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS UP: Comey’s Attorneys Reportedly Provide Doctored Transcripts in His Perjury Trial”

  1. So, where are the consequences. By altering those words, they committed fraud on the court. When will they be disbarred? When will the face consequences?

    Oh, silly me. They're Dems. Not even Trump will force consequences on them. How sad.

  2. Comey’s judge Michael Nachmanoff is a Biden appointee. He will allow doctored Transcripts. He should just say not guilty now before the trial. No one is challenging these lawfare judges anyway.

  3. So, you wrote this entire article about Comey's attorney's doctoring transcripts, and decided not to put what they doctored, and how they doctored it, into the article. Wonderful.

    • The article says the lawyers altered two words in Comey's senate testimony to make it look like Ted Cruz asked a question that he never asked.
      Please try to keep up.

  4. We work in the law and see this all the time in documents produced in discovery by the defense . Common practice that requires experts with the deep knowledge of the industry to catch this.

  5. Perhaps Comey's lawyers need to be charged as well! Perhaps that was also planned. If he loses these lawyers, he will try to have his own proceedings deferred a while longer, to drag it out.

  6. Useless Pammy the cover-girl wannabe like the rest of us watched Trump’s people handcuffed, leg-shackled and perp-walked in airports in front of cameras by democrats!
    She watched as democrats midnight raided Trump’s Florida home, rummaging through his wife’s lingerie closet and pantry drawers! Pammy girl watched Democrats impeach Trump twice on unconstitutional charges, had him arrested and mug shot in an attempt to put him in jail on bogus charges to bankrupt him and his family, and celebrated an assassination attempt that actually drew blood! Yet will do nothing but continue to treat this “thing” as democrat royalty as the rest of the filthy democrats continue to walk around free! Disgusting!!

  7. Will the attorneys be disciplined for this? Or will everyone just step back and say "Oops! Nevermind."?
    Because this is straight up tampering with evidence!

  8. Need a "tall" jumpsuit for Comey
    As soon as the first conspirator is threatened with jail time. the cards will start to fall

  9. “You can call us wrong, but don’t call us weasels. We are not weasels.”

    — Jimmy "The Weasel" Comey, Politico 09/28/2016

  10. If any of Comey's attorneys signed a verification page as part of their motion or presentation, they may be subject to prosecution for perjury by the Court, and must withdraw as counsel. They should, at the very least, be subject to professional discipline, and possibly disbarred.

  11. Again proving that there is no one on the left with a normal, let alone high, intellect. You have to be a flaming idiot to believe in the inane ideology of the left. They have no good policy!

  12. actually presenting know false transcripts would be perjury because the attorneys would have to represent that the transcripts were a true and accurate copy. This can be charged as a felony and could result in the attorneys being disbarred. This would also be a 'Brady Issue' and could result in Comey having to obtain new representation.

  13. Did I miss in the article just what the two words were that Comey's lawyers switched? I apologize if of missed them but that seems like a pretty big part of the story……

  14. LMWAO ! Ask me : are you surprised -Nope .Ask me : Can you believe his stooges would try this- Nope . Ask me is this traitor rat going to get away with this -yep .

    • It appears thats a problem for any of the needed indictments and prosecutions going forward. The DOJ is fighting the courts and judges rather than just the lawyers for the defense.

  15. The story doesn’t provide the authentic and correct transcript copy nor the alleged doctored copy, which is the most important part.

  16. There is something very fishy about this story. First off, we don’t know what was changed. Seems to be a very critical piece of information that is missing. Second, I am assuming that Comey’s attorneys are at least mildly competent so why would you submit to the court a document that could easily be refuted? Especially with the penalties associated with this kind of behavior. This just doesn’t add up.

  17. 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) – Tampering with an official proceeding (includes altering evidence): Felony
    Maximum: 20 years in prison + fines
    Minimum: No mandatory minimum (judge’s discretion, often probation for first-time/non-violent cases)

    18 U.S.C. § 1519 – Destruction/alteration of records in federal investigations:Felony
    Maximum: 20 years
    Minimum: None

    Either way, this should be elevated and charged.

    • Bingo! And it seems to happen all the time. Government emails should be 'unerasable' in order to prevent such crimes.

  18. This guy and about 10 others MUST be tried and jailed for future generations to see that this cannot happen again. Or they WILL be brought to justice. And don't even try to pull off something like Hillary has done.

  19. I miss the old Howdy-Doody Show with Clarabelle the Clown. He didn't speak but frequently answered questions posed to him. He had a wooden box in front of him on a belt. The box had two squeeze bulb horns, one on each side. One side was for "Yes" and the other side was for "No". Witnesses should, at times, be required to answer questions using the Clarabelle Clown method.

  20. Providing doctored, altered, falsified, or fabricated transcripts of interviews, depositions, court hearings, or sworn testimony to a court constitutes one or more of the following felonies:
    1. Perjury (if done under oath or penalty of perjury)
    18 U.S.C. § 1621 (federal) and equivalent state statutes (e.g., California Penal Code § 118, New York Penal Law § 210.15, Texas Penal Code § 37.02).

    Submitting a falsified transcript that you certify or imply is accurate is lying under oath.
    Penalty: Up to 5–7 years in prison (federal) and similar under state law.

    2. Subornation of Perjury (if you induce someone else to submit the fake transcript)
    18 U.S.C. § 1622

    Up to 5 years federal prison.

    3. Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence
    18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) (federal); state equivalents (e.g., California PC § 141, Florida § 918.13, Illinois 720 ILCS 5/31-4).

    Altering a transcript that will be used in an official proceeding = felony.
    Penalty: Up to 20 years federal; 3–7 years typical under state law.

    4. Obstruction of Justice
    18 U.S.C. § 1503 (federal omnibus clause) or § 1512; state versions.

    Knowingly submitting fake evidence to influence a case.
    Penalty: Up to 20 years federal.

    5. Filing False Instruments / Offering False Evidence
    State-specific (e.g., New York Penal Law § 175.35 – Offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree, Class E felony; California PC § 132, § 134 – up to 4–5 years).

  21. Interesting, the lawyer (officer of the court) has submitted a fraud to the court. What will be done? Absolutely NOTHING!!!! Until those who, smirk when sitting in the chair after taking an oath are carted off to jail, this SHEEET will continue

    • If Soundbite Barbie had any value whatsoever, she would have a superseding indictment filed by the end of the week adding new charges for fraud and evidence tampering to his current charges.

      • Only if she wanted to do it as blindly and stupidly as you would do it. When Trump‘s people charges, it will be because they have a chance of getting a conviction, or possibly, of inducing one of the guilty to lie in defense of a long-term conspiracy, to get the statute of limitations to start all over again. That was the purpose being served by some of the congressional subpoenas that you nattering nabobs of negativism also criticized.

        • And she needs to find a venue in which she can get a conviction.
          No point in wasting 'court' time in and around DC.

        • "… it will be because they have a chance of getting a conviction, …"

          Screw that!!! At least make them pay thru the nose via legal defense costs. Dems have NO problems doing so to those who are not even close to being guilty of what they've been charged with.

          BURY THEM WITH COURT COSTS!!!

    • I believe the word SHEET is inappropriate.
      Schiff works much better in its place.
      Schiff: definition: fake crap piled higher and deeper for political purposes.

    • Comey has a Biden judge; it seems to me that Comey and his clan are hoping that breaking the law will not matter to the Leftist judge. Besides, the judge is already showing him favor so they think they will get away it and are home FREE!

    • There still must be actions taken to hold Bar Associations accountable. To Date none have gotten slapped for their unethical/illegal determinations (and licensure revocations). Could this be a trap?

    • EXACTLY! I was the defendant in a civil lawsuit where the Plaintiffs attorney openly admitted that he doctored a document, which a previous copy had already been entered into evidence, and he was attempting to enter it again. Blatantly obvious. When this was pointed out to the Judge, the Plaintiffs attorney said "I wrote that on the document, not my client", admitting that it was himself who doctored evidence. The Judge just poo-pooed the situation and said 'well, you can't submit a document that is already in evidence a second time. Just take this document back.' All this over our objection.

      The system is, Judges protecting their brethren.

  22. HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! No, you can't make this stuff up. But this is REALLY absurd. And I don't think they are going to get away with it.

    DEMOCRATS HAVE TO CHEAT TO WIN. Disgusting people.

  23. Throw in the possibility that the DOJ will call Comey's attorney as a witness for the prosecution……and Comey will be fitted for an extra tall orange jumpsuit.

  24. Well the biden/obama/clinton judge handling the case will just ignore it and say something like "Wellllll…it could have happened that way. I'll admit it".

    Stop thinking there is going to be justice for these coup conspirators and deep state criminals. There is only ONE WAY there will ever be justice, but I don't see The People making a big move to do it.

    FJB FKH FFBI FDOJ!!!

    • I hate to believe it but I think you're right.

      The judicial system is so corrupted by the democrats now that there will never be justice for the damage the dems have done.

  25. —You can’t make this up – Jim Comey’s attorneys reportedly doctored transcripts when providing documents in his perjury trial.—

    I expect nothing less from these crooked piece of……..well, you know.

    -Honest Metro Cop, retired; suspended and transferred several times for calling out politically corrupted superiors’ failures to act—

  26. They hamstrung the Trump admin with their Russia hoax and stole the 2020 election through fraud. They have no problem lying.

  27. So the real question is what will the judge do about this disbar able offence committed by Comey's attorneys? Also can the DOJ indict these attorneys for tampering with evidence?

  28. People like Comey believe that their felonious behavior is justified bc of the "sensitivity of the situation". Comey in an orange (perfect!) jumpsuit will go a long way in changing deep state behavior.

  29. So what was the testimony and what were the two words that were switched out. Are we suppose to guess ? Why not include this in this clickbait story ?

  30. They have the "right" judge so they will just say it was a computer glitch and this will not change a thing in court.

  31. When You Lie to Congress Under Oath, Apparently Nothing is Beyond the Pail, so Altering Official Transcripts during a Legal Proceeding and then testifying that is the truth, is JUST A NORMAL THING FOR CRIMIALS LIKE THIS !!!

  32. As I recall, the judge is a D appointee…have the lawyers been sanctioned for introducing knowingly false 'evidence'?

  33. Whoever doctored the transcripts put themselves in jeopardy of being prosecuted for falsifying evidence (doctoring transcripts of perjury in a congressional subcommittee).

  34. Why isn't Comey in jail. He committed treason, heresy, insubordination and sold info to foreign agents. What does it take before jail is mandatory?

  35. Nothing will happen to the lawyer or Comey. We have an injustice system, where the politically connected never go to jail for their crimes.

  36. Well, they didn't get away with it, because here it is. Where did TGP get this bit of info? Consequences.

  37. Ok I'll bite – what were the 2 words that were altered in the transcript. For the life of me I do not see the actual citation and alteration of the transcript. I must be missing something…

  38. Um … OK, after reading this article 3 or 4 times, I give up: What were the two words in the transcript that Comey's lawyers altered?

  39. It’s a simple fact, most lawyers are criminals and most politicians are lawyers. It’s foolish and naive to expect them and their ilk to adhere to the law.

  40. We lack accountability in this country so probably nothing will happen. Now if it was for a conservative? Oh yeah, start building the gallows!

  41. If the attorney did so, he could be disciplined by the Bar Association and face suspension or loss of his license. We need to get conservative lawyers on bar associations. The bar association is lax with Democrat attornets, just as Democrats are lax about crime

  42. You would think the USA would have a Department or a System that ensures Justice is equally applied and lawless people get punished…

  43. These doltish journalists haven't told us what the original transcript said, and how the transcript was altered. You must be joking.

  44. This is like a clown show.

    Did they actually believe that they would not get caught? The original transcripts from the hearing are public record. All you have to do is compare what is submitted to the original, and you will see any changes that have been made.

          • Lawfare is applying the law in an implicit manner. Allowing fraudulent documents would constitute a breach of judicial law. The judge can get into real trouble very quickly, especially since it’s so obvious.

            How she addresses the fraud will likely determine how the case is handled overall, meaning that if the lawyers do not face professional sanctions, including disbarment, monetary fines, or even criminal charges. It will set a precedent that will quickly be challenged, and I don’t believe it will hold up in any appeals court.

  45. And who's going to punish them ? The corrupt judge ? The captured and corrupt bar association ?
    Remember what the FISA court judges did to the prosecutors and FBLie agents who lied to them repeatedly to get warrants on Carter Page and others ? NOTHING ! Even after they found out, they still granted more warrants.

  46. "See Becket (1964 film) ('Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?')"

    Does comey really want that to be a standard in law? Cuz we got a nice little seashell photo that would meet this standard

  47. Because they know in this court in this venue with this judge and jury they can do whatever they want and get away with it.

  48. This sounds like the move Saul Goodman made when he doctored his brother's documents and made a deliberate mistake on the address.

  49. If Comey does not do some serious prison time, then America definitely has a two-tiered justice system. As for the attorney, he should be prosecuted, found guilty, disbarred, and put in prison for fraud.

  50. Comey is INTENTIONALLY defrauding another Court. Bondi is obviously on Comeys and Deep States side or else she would charge the Lawyers and Comey himself for these NEW crimes…..She WILL NOT. The Court may actually base their decisions on documents they know to be fraudulent. PURE BOLSHEVISM.

  51. Arrogance of the criminal's attorneys and incompetence of the DOJ show that nothing will happen to Sir James Comey, the Clinton lackey in chief.

  52. Does the left understand that virtually all of the hate, chaos, crime, lies, and madness in this country is coming from their side?

  53. don’t ya know that Comey and his attorneys can alter anything he wants. He’s the leader of the FBI and altered anything he wanted.

  54. The fix is already in. The presiding trial judge is a Demonicrat and so is his magistrate flunky. There will be no repercussions for Comey's dirtbag lawyers and there will be no conviction.

    Indicting Comey in the Eastern District of Virginia was completely unjustified unless you just want to lose the case. Looking at you Blondi.

  55. Did the altered words change the substance of the transcript, or were they mere scrivener's errors? The author does not provide us any way to know here. And besides, can we really expect lawyers to accurately reproduce testimony from the congressional record? Lawyering is really hard sometimes! /s

    • The article states the alteration made it appear Sen. Cruz asked a question which wasn't asked and YES! Lawyer's have to faithfully reproduce testimony from transcripts in ALL legal cases.

  56. Hey – Jimmy is used to lying to Courts (see FISA), and corrupt judges (are there any other kind?) let him get away with it.

  57. Martial Law may be the only way to arrest those guilty, and get them in prison where they should be. Democrats did that conservatives who committed no crimes with out resorting to Martial Law. Can anyone tell how that happened?

  58. The judge will take care of any impropriety on the part of the defense team. This will not be the last we hear of it. What it will do is prolong the process with motions, arguments on motions, denials and appeals on the judges denials bla bla bla. Hello September or October for an actual trial.

  59. He is so accustomed to getting away with anything, lying has become a habit. The question is, is the judge also corrupt? If so, Comey has nothing to worry about.

  60. California disbarred John Eastman for telling the truth. These lawyers will likely get away with lying to a judge, because it’s a notoriously leftist circuit.

  61. what it shows is they have below zero respect for our laws and the constitution and that they will make up the rules as they go. it’s nothing short of a miracle that these people weren’t successful. they had the power, they had the money, they had boatliads of fear to spread.

  62. The REAL COURT IS coming.. and will not be conducted by men. Life and Death will be in the Balance in this Court.

  63. You cannot defined justice with false info! It’s not going to work anymore. Time to bring in the Military. It’s the only way at this point!

Comments are closed.