Was “Patsy Witness” Inserted Into Epstein Case to Offset Clinton Crimes and Frame Trump? | Joe Hoft


Get The Latest


Get The Latest

Was “Patsy Witness” Inserted Into Epstein Case to Offset Clinton Crimes and Frame Trump?

Bill Clinton Jeffrey Epstein

Was a Patsy inserted into the Epstein story to muddy the waters and make perp Bill Clinton look less disgusting by lying about others like citizen Trump?

The Daily Caller reported that there is no evidence of then citizen Donald Trump having anything to do with sex with minors in the latest documents released related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Prominent Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre said former President Donald Trump did not partake in deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes, newly unsealed documents show.

Giuffre sat for a deposition in January 2016 as part of litigation between Guiffre’s attorneys and former Epstein defense attorney Alan Dershowitz that was settled in April 2016, the New York Times reported. Giuffre cleared the air on whether Trump witnesses sexual abuse of minors, according to a newly released transcript.

“I don’t think Donald Trump participated in anything. That would have to be another assumption. I never saw or witnessed Donald Trump participate in those acts, but was he in the house of Jeffrey Epstein. I’ve heard he has been, but I haven’t seen him myself so I don’t know,” Giuffre testified…

Johanna Sjoberg, an Epstein victim deposed during the litigation, recalled going to one of Trump’s casinos and said she never massaged Trump, a transcript of her deposition released Wednesday shows.

But yesterday it was reported that one individual did claim that citizen Trump had sex with females surrounding podophile Jeffrey Epstein.  Per the New York Post which has an adversarial relationship with President Trump:

A Jeffrey Epstein accuser once claimed former President Donald Trump allegedly had “sexual relations” with one of her unnamed friends at the late pedophile’s New York home “on regular occasions,” according to another trove of court documents unsealed Monday.

Sarah Ransome, in a string of 2016 emails to then-New York Post columnist Maureen Callahan also claimed that she had copies of tapes Epstein had made of some of his high-profile friends — Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and British business magnate Richard Branson — allegedly having sex with an unnamed woman.

“She confided in me about her casual ‘friendship’ with Donald. Mr. Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples,’” Ransome wrote about her friend in one email, made public when the latest batch of newly unsealed documents dropped.

“I also know she had sexual relations with Trump at Jeffery’s NY mansion on regular occasions,” she added.

Ransome walked back the salacious allegations in an Oct. 23, 2016 email with Callahan, writing, “I would like to retract everything I have said to you and walk away from this,” according to the filing.

President Trump immediately made a statement saying these accusations were false and retracted by the accuser years ago. Trump Campaign spokesman Steven Cheung slammed these false and defamatory claims in a statement:

These baseless accusations have been fully retracted because they are simply false and have no merit.

One has to wonder if the accuser who said she saw Trump having sex with girls, the only accuser to date to say so, who then retracted her accusations, was inserted for a reason.

Was this accuser a witness patsy?

This is an old hand move, to use a Patsy witness who says what actually happened – the sex of Clinton on tape, but then retracts it to start giving appearances that she is not a credible witness.  Think about this – it is creating the perception that the reality of Clinton having sex with those girls, wasn’t true because this witness is not credible.  So you have the general public influenced to believe that this is someone who was just opportunistic in saying these things, as if those tapes don’t actually exist (which by default, we should believe they DO exist).

You see the point? The Clintons and their cronies inject doubt of evidence of Bill Clinton having sex with minors existing at all, via this single person. The Clinton mafia uses this evidence to damage the evidence and harm those they do not like.

This seems to be what really is going on here. 


1 thought on “Was “Patsy Witness” Inserted Into Epstein Case to Offset Clinton Crimes and Frame Trump?”

Leave a Comment