Top 20 Inaccuracies and Flaws in Christina Ford’s Letter to Senator Feinstein | Joe Hoft


Get The Latest


Get The Latest

Top 20 Inaccuracies and Flaws in Christina Ford’s Letter to Senator Feinstein

A reminder that the letter to Senator Feinstein from Dr. Ford who accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct nearly 40 years ago is full of inaccuracies and flaws!

The Internet is the place where individuals with different backgrounds and skill sets are able to combine their efforts to address the many lies in the MSM today. This happens all the time and the MSM hates it when their lies are uncovered or questioned.

Last week Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of tweets that dissect and refute the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh. Dr. Ford’s letter is full of flaws which lead one to realize something just doesn’t add up!

Dr. ‘Dossy’ Blumenthal states that she believes Ford’s letter is written by a third party –

Dossy lists her credibility reviewing letters to Congress –

Dossy also has a Ph.D with a focus on creative writing –

Here is Dossy’s list of issues and inaccuracies in the Ford letter to Senator Feinstein –

1. Dossy overall believes that an educated person did not write Dr. Ford’s letter –

Dossy provides a copy of the letter –

2. Dossy notes that the first clue is “high school” is capitalized when it shouldn’t be –

3. Dossy says people use their best English when writing Congress yet Dr. Ford’s letter is sloppy –

4. The font size of the first line of the second paragraph is in a different font – would a professor send such a sloppy letter to Congress?

5. Dr. Ford wrote “in the early 1980’s” – wrong grammar – should be “1980s” –

6. Emotional constituents would not be so vague –

7. It’s odd that Judge Kavanaugh’s name is not in the first line – why? –

8. Why did Dr. Ford say she hasn’t “knowingly” seen Kavanaugh since? Was she drunk?

9. Dr. Ford says “they” locked the door – which one – both?

10. Dr. Ford writes a “very drunken” – poor English again – should be “very drunk” –

11. The letter does not mirror being from someone who is a Dr. –

12. The awkward English has poor grammar interspersed with flowery language –

13. Dr. Ford calls psychotherapy as medical treatment – why? –

As already noted, the letter is not from someone who has been published in journals – no way –

14. The letter refers to the same bathroom twice making it sound like two different bathrooms –

15. Why does Dr. Ford use her maiden name in the letter?

16. Why does Dr. Ford not refer to herself as Dr.?

17. Confidential is in the letter 3 times – when did Dr. Ford agree to release her name? –

18. Dr. Ford shifts tense in the same sentence – not professional –

19. Was there a privacy release from Dr. Ford? If so, when? –

20. The whole letter just does not add up – no way –

Finally— Dossy states that it is ironic that the same people that contaminate our culture promoting sex to children scream outrage when conservatives are accused of sexual misdeeds –

(We first reported this last week and it now has more weight now that the many inaccuracies in Dr. Ford’s testimony to the Senate are uncovered.)

It looks like the Internet again uncovered another Left wing lie! Let’s hope Republican Senators point this out in the upcoming hearing!

Leave a Comment