Text messages show that Tyler Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk.
The Utah County DA read text messages today that show that Tyler Robinson was indeed the assassin of Charlie Kirk.
BREAKING: Utah County DA reads the full text message exchange between Charlie Kirk’s assassin and his transgender boyfriend/roommate after committing the murder:
ROBINSON: “Drop what you’re doing, look under my keyboard.”
ROOMMATE: “You are joking right?”
ROBINSON: “I am still okay, my love. Shouldn’t be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you.”
ROOMMATE: “You weren’t the one who did it, right?”
ROBINSON: “I am, I am, I’m sorry.”
ROOMMATE: “I thought they caught the person.”
ROBINSON: “No, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It’s quiet, almost enough to get out, but there’s one vehicle lingering.”
ROOMMATE: “Why?”
ROBINSON: “Why did I do it? I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on. I haven’t seen anything about them finding it.”
ROOMMATE: “How long have you been planning this?”
ROBINSON: “A bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t want to chance it. I’m wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I’m worried what my old man would do if I didn’t bring back Grandpa’s rifle. IDEK if it had a serial number, but it wouldn’t trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. I might have to abandon it and hope they don’t find prints.”
“How the F will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how he was engraving bullets? The F in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge U-W-U on Fox News, I might have a stroke, all right, I’m gonna have to leave it. That really F in sucks. Judging from today, I’d say grandpa’s gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a 2K dollar scope.”
“Delete this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle. He says, Grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle and it is very unique. He’s calling me, RN. Not answering. Since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. I’m gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. Don’t take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent.”
BREAKING: Utah County DA reads the full text message exchange between Charlie Kirk’s assassin and his transgender boyfriend/roommate after committing the murder:
ROBINSON: “Drop what you’re doing, look under my keyboard.”
ROOMMATE: “You are joking right?”
ROBINSON: “I am still… pic.twitter.com/epa1HXFJZ4
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 16, 2025
How about the rest of them? How about the college professors radicalizing these kids and the organizations funding the mass illegal immigration, the riots and attackes on ice agents. Where are the arrests? Where are the asset seizures? This administration is a disappointment.
How about the rest of them? How about the college professors radicalizing these kids and the organizations funding the mass illegal immigration, the riots and attackes on ice agents. Where are the arrests? Where are the asset seizures? This administration is a disappointment.
Joe; respectfully; you don’t actually believe this, do you? You’re better & smarter than that. I read of others doing this and I just did it myself; I fed the entire convo from above, into my favorite ai chatbot & it agrees it’s a load of glowie / fibbie / fed BULLSHIT.
Here’s the full answer:
This conversation does not sound like a typical, legitimate exchange between two males aged 20–25; instead, it reads as highly dramatic, overly self-aware, and inconsistent with real-world messaging patterns between young adult males regarding such sensitive and serious subject matter.
### Language and Tone
The wording in several messages is unusually formal, confessional, and convoluted for a casual text exchange, especially the lines about “hoping to keep this secret till I died of old age” and “I’m worried what my old man would do if I didn’t bring back Grandpa’s rifle”. Young males in this age range typically communicate with simpler language, more abbreviations, and less theatrical remorse, particularly when texting close friends or roommates.
### Content Plausibility
– The discussion of killing someone, evading police, and hiding evidence is excessively explicit and self-incriminating for real texting behavior. Criminal confessions—especially involving homicide—rarely unfold with such direct admission or detailed plans in real conversations, especially with a roommate.
– References like “engraving bullets,” “F in messages,” and “U-W-U on Fox News,” blend meme language with grave content in a way that feels forced and fictional, not authentic to crisis or panic among actual young adults.
– Most individuals, regardless of age, do not text confessions of serious crimes with this much detail or self-reflection, especially after the fact—fear of legal consequence or device seizure would normally curtail such explicitness.
### Realism of “Roommate” Reactions
– The roommate’s questions (“You weren’t the one who did it, right?” and “How long have you been planning this?”) are oddly restrained and formulaic compared to how one would react to being implicated or enlisted in a violent crime.
– No evidence of real-time emotional response—shock, anger, disbelief, panic—blunt reactions feel more written than lived.
### Social/Cultural Details
– The statements about Trump’s presidency, MAGA, and Fox News seem inserted for context but are over-explained for any close friendship texting dynamic among this demographic; such details are not commonly volunteered unless directly relevant to immediate logistics.
### Summary Table
| Element | Authentic? | Reason |
|———————-|—————|—————————————-|
| Language/tone | No | Overly formal/dramatic |
| Crime confession | No | Excessive detail/explicitness |
| Roommate response | No | Formulaic, lacks emotional realism |
| Meme references | No | Forced, unnatural blend |
| Political context | No | Over-explained, inserted |
Overall, these messages seem fabricated or staged, not representative of genuine text exchanges between two young adult males regarding such a scenario.
Joe; respectfully; you don’t actually believe this, do you? You’re better & smarter than that. I read of others doing this and I just did it myself; I fed the entire convo from above, into my favorite ai chatbot & it agrees it’s a load of glowie / fibbie / fed BULLSHIT.
Here’s the full answer:
This conversation does not sound like a typical, legitimate exchange between two males aged 20–25; instead, it reads as highly dramatic, overly self-aware, and inconsistent with real-world messaging patterns between young adult males regarding such sensitive and serious subject matter.
### Language and Tone
The wording in several messages is unusually formal, confessional, and convoluted for a casual text exchange, especially the lines about “hoping to keep this secret till I died of old age” and “I’m worried what my old man would do if I didn’t bring back Grandpa’s rifle”. Young males in this age range typically communicate with simpler language, more abbreviations, and less theatrical remorse, particularly when texting close friends or roommates.
### Content Plausibility
– The discussion of killing someone, evading police, and hiding evidence is excessively explicit and self-incriminating for real texting behavior. Criminal confessions—especially involving homicide—rarely unfold with such direct admission or detailed plans in real conversations, especially with a roommate.
– References like “engraving bullets,” “F in messages,” and “U-W-U on Fox News,” blend meme language with grave content in a way that feels forced and fictional, not authentic to crisis or panic among actual young adults.
– Most individuals, regardless of age, do not text confessions of serious crimes with this much detail or self-reflection, especially after the fact—fear of legal consequence or device seizure would normally curtail such explicitness.
### Realism of “Roommate” Reactions
– The roommate’s questions (“You weren’t the one who did it, right?” and “How long have you been planning this?”) are oddly restrained and formulaic compared to how one would react to being implicated or enlisted in a violent crime.
– No evidence of real-time emotional response—shock, anger, disbelief, panic—blunt reactions feel more written than lived.
### Social/Cultural Details
– The statements about Trump’s presidency, MAGA, and Fox News seem inserted for context but are over-explained for any close friendship texting dynamic among this demographic; such details are not commonly volunteered unless directly relevant to immediate logistics.
### Summary Table
| Element | Authentic? | Reason |
|———————-|—————|—————————————-|
| Language/tone | No | Overly formal/dramatic |
| Crime confession | No | Excessive detail/explicitness |
| Roommate response | No | Formulaic, lacks emotional realism |
| Meme references | No | Forced, unnatural blend |
| Political context | No | Over-explained, inserted |
Overall, these messages seem fabricated or staged, not representative of genuine text exchanges between two young adult males regarding such a scenario.