The New York Times Continues with Globalist Talking Points Calling Comey’s Indictment “Politically Driven”

The Times cries over Comey’s arrest and claims politics. 

The New York Times continues with its far-left liberal bias and globalist talking points.  It really should be investigated to see who is paying it to publish such sinister garbage.

The New York Times shared on the Comey investigation this way:

The Justice Department is giving President Trump what he wants. Here’s how my colleagues described last night’s news:

The clearest way to understand the extraordinary nature of the indictment on Thursday of James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, is to offer up a simple recitation of the facts.

An inexperienced prosecutor loyal to President Trump, in the job for less than a week, filed criminal charges against one of her boss’s most-reviled opponents. She did so not only at Mr. Trump’s direct command, but also against the urging of both her own subordinates and her predecessor, who had just been fired for raising concerns that there was insufficient evidence to indict.

At the same time, the Justice Department has also ordered prosecutors to investigate George Soros, a billionaire Democratic donor whom Trump has targeted for financing left-wing groups.

What is the Times going to do when tens, if not hundreds of other radical far-left criminals are charged for worse crimes, including sedition?  What will the Times write when Obama is indicted?  Or Biden?  Or Wray, John Brennan, Clapper, Susan Rice, and many more?  What will the Times say then?

Let’s compare these comments to the Times reporting when President Trump was indicted in a New York court for accounting entries he never made and was tried in a court run by a corrupt New York judge whose daughter was reaping millions in donations from Democrats.

Mr. Trump asked Justice Merchan to recuse himself from his trial, citing the judge’s daughter’s work as a Democratic consultant. The judge sought guidance from a state advisory committee on judicial ethics, which found that his impartiality could not reasonably be questioned based on his daughter’s work.

But Mr. Trump persisted. He assailed the judge, a moderate Democrat, as “biased” and “conflicted,” and attacked the judge’s daughter on social media.

In response to Mr. Trump’s second request to recuse himself, Justice Merchan, on the first day of trial, responded, “There is no agenda here” and said, “We want justice to be done.”

And the New York Times believed them.  But when it comes to justice and truth, the Times looks the other way.

More will be revealed.  Hold tight.