The BULL$#!T Case Brought Against Tina Peters
Guest post by Martel Maxim.
The corruption probably doesn’t get any worse than this. On September 2, 2021 a meeting was convened by Sherronna Bishop and associates to show the Mesa County Commissioners and other leadership the Election Security findings of former Mesa County Election Clerk Tina Peters. To Sherronna’s surprise, FBI Director Christopher Wray, US Attorney General Merrick Garland and even CNN (Paul Murphy) were in attendance (via video). Why would Federal agents be in attendance with this state issue, and why would CNN be approved to be invited?
Not only were the County Commissioners the intended recipients of this information, but also in attendance (among others) was Law Enforcement officer Detective Struwe who with his thugs acting under the color of law would later ambush Clerk Peters in a Grand Junction Coffee Shop in a raid rivaling the ambush of Lee Harvey Oswald in the movie theatre after the JFK assassination. The 6 minute documentary of those Stasi tactics is available HERE.
This video should scare everyone. By the way, repeatedly during the meeting, Commissioner Janet Rowland repeatedly asked Sherronna and Shawn Smith “Why didn’t you bring this to the attention of Law Enforcement”. Duhhh.
That ambush was based upon the fraudulent testimony of the DA Dan Rubinstein, who claimed he observed Clerk Peters making a recording on her iPad in a prior courtroom proceeding with her Deputy. After that, DA Shapiro stated that he wasn’t sure if she was actually making a recording. Upon examination of the iPad, it was determined that Clerk Peters hadn’t made the recording she was accused of. All that was moot however, as Clerk Peters was held in contempt for lying to the Judge by saying she wasn’t making a recording. That conviction was later vacated by an appeals court, but it was too late. Judge Barrett used it as a basis for giving Tina Peters an extremely harsh 9 year Prison Sentence, because she was seen by him as someone who has utter disregard for the law.
During this September 2 briefing, Cybersecurity Expert Col (Ret) Shawn Smith exposed the myriad of problems illuminating the vulnerabilities of the election system (which by the way never resulted in any action anywhere by Cybersecurity professionals to assess the software, the systems or the threats). Nobody, including Mesa County Attorney Todd Starr ever lifted a finger to consider this information handed to them on a silver platter.
What action did result? All in attendance realized they had a problem, and now they had to shoot the messenger, former Clerk Tina Peters who exposed it all.
This leads us into the bigger picture that all election records were deleted during the Dominion Systems “Trusted Build”, and those records were deleted only a few months into the required 22 months required by 52 USC 20701. The before and after images proved this, and many other things detailed at https://tinapeters.us/reports/.
So here we have the second smoking gun indicating this was a federal Issue that if challenged in a Federal court would have enabled discovery about the faulty election systems, and they sure didn’t want that disclosed. Instead, the criminals needed to come up with an alternate universe alibi they could control which led to the fabrication of Colorado state charges against Clerk Peters. The DA did nothing to engage law enforcement, even though all the proof in the world showed him that the election system’s “Adjudication Logs” and “Communication Logs” were illegally missing after the Trusted Build, in addition to 29,000 Election Records. Did he care? NO.
All those in authority cared about was framing Clerk Peters with manufactured state crimes so the vulnerabilities in the election system never again saw the light of day. Why was it so important to hide the truth? A good working theory is that they were all compromised and controlled, because the forces behind them were Deep State players pulling their strings as part of the plot to overthrow America. It’s no secret that the overthrow of other countries was enabled by stolen elections (Brazil, Venezuela etc.), and this time, America was in the crosshairs.
The DA and the SOS and a host of trusted liars flipped the script, and vilified the messenger acting on behalf of the citizens who elected her. At the same time, it was later discovered that a few key Mesa County employees in control of the Dominion contract actually worked for Dominion. Can’t make this stuff up!
So let’s take inventory of the evidence – this was a Federal situation that Colorado completely ignored in order to triage the truth they didn’t want to get out.
#1-the SOS authorized the deletion of the 29,000 Federal Election Records long before the Federal 22 Month retention requirement
#2-The home of Tina Peters was raided by the FBI.
#3-This meeting was attended by the two highest Federal authorities, the US Attorney General, Merrick Garland and the FBI Director, Christopher Wray.
When there’s no way out, you blame the people who brought the information to you as being conspiracy theorists, and you find a way to silence them, as detailed in Saul Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals” Tina Peters was silenced by sentencing her to 9 years in prison under the facade of state charges which were BULL$#!T, with no basis in law. In other words, there were zero laws that Clerk Peters broke, so they had to make up charges under the color of law, similar to the techniques used against President Trump and other enemies of fascist regimes.
These people from top to bottom were not acting in good faith supporting their oath, and they were in so deep that they had to abuse their office and accuse the only one who upheld her oath, in order to fraudulently send her to prison. They accomplished their coup chiefly by ignoring the Supremacy Clause which never gave anyone in Colorado any authority to pursue any charges against Clerk Peters.
The new DOJ will get to the bottom of this in short order. Immediately however, Colorado Governor Polis should allow for Tina Peters to at least be out on Bond pending her appeal which will take roughly 2-3 years. There is no justification in the world for Tina to be imprisoned in the meantime, as she has zero criminal history, and she is close to 70 years in age. Additionally, the rationale Judge Barrett relied on that ‘she has little regard for the law’ is because he believed she lied to him. TinaPeters.US reveals it all, as does “Selection Code” on her website. The iPad ruling got vacated. The Bottom Line is that Colorado never had any jurisdiction to begin with to prosecute her.