The more we learn the more we know the FBI and Secret Service are lying to us.
The FBI and Secret Service are not telling us the truth about the events surrounding the attempted assassination attempt of President Trump on July 13.
The official line is the following from the corrupt FBI and other three-letter agencies.
➡️Crooks was the only shooter and fired all 8 shots.
➡️A municipal officer confronted Crooks but retreated when a rifle was pointed at them by Crooks. Seconds later shots rang out.
➡️Crooks was killed by a lone sniper bullet shot by Secret Service immediately after the shooting started and Crooks was finally spotted.
This official narrative is entirely incorrect based on information to date. There is no way the FBI can back it up. They can only lie. This is what they do best – lie.
For weeks we have had audio analysis that more than indicated that there was more than one gun used on July 13.
We first reported on there potentially being a second gunman only a few days after the shooting. CNN reported this based on forensics:
Forensic analysis suggests that at least two weapons were fired at the rally — including at least one apparently fired as part of the response by law enforcement officials. The first eight shots were consistent with the alleged weapon and the final two shots were emitted by one or two “same or similar” weapon, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, a senior professional research associate at the same institution.
Then we shared a video of an expert detailing the sounds from the guns and without any changes to the audio, you can hear that there are at least two different guns.
PhD Chris Mortensen has posted multiple videos on Twitter about audios from the event indicating there were two shooters.
Here’s the next installment of The Citizens’ Investigation into Trump’s near assassination. The audio has been mostly figured out and resolved. The evidence is consistent with 2 baddies and 2 LEO weapons being fired. As you walk through the evidence with me, this is clear. pic.twitter.com/4OYgssv8vf
— Chris Martenson, PhD (@chrismartenson) July 25, 2024
Then Monday we were provided a tip of a video coming out that shows a second shooter. When slowed down you can see the flashes coming out of a downstairs window.
BREAKING – New rifle fire signature (sound + visual rifle flash) recorded and posted by @RealDJstew724 (on X), appearing to show suppressed (sniper) rifle fire from a first floor window underneath the Crooks roof, fired TOWARD the Trump podium. Approximate time is 9.15 seconds… pic.twitter.com/fnlEI8Po7D
— HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) July 28, 2024
Then Tuesday Mortenson obtained the video and dissected the video. There is now audio and video confirmation of a second gunman.
A video shot by David J Stewart (@realDJStew724on Twitter) completely blows the official narrative out of the water. It is the Zapruder film of our time.
The official narrative is that:
➡️Crooks was the only shooter and fired all 8 shots.
➡️A municipal officer confronted Crooks but retreated when a rifle was pointed at them by Crooks. Seconds later shots rang out.
➡️Crooks was killed by a lone sniper bullet shot by Secret Service immediately after the shooting started and Crooks was finally spotted.This film and its audio, connected to an analysis of the angles involved, conclusively show that Crooks would have been exposed to the Secret Service long before the shots rang out (OR Crooks wouldn’t have had time to get in position and settle down to take the most accurate shot which was the first one) and reconfirms our earlier audio analysis.
The audio from the Stewart video is strikingly clear.Qualitatively, shots 1 through 3 sound completely different from shots 4 through 8 (and shot 9 remains entirely different from either of those two sets of shots).
Quantitatively, shots 1-3 are higher pitched and lacking in the pitched frequencies that are consistently found in shots 4-8. While not 100% conclusive, this now tilts the hypothesis set away from Crooks being the lone shooter and puts the onus on those who would seek to prove that. Instead, the weight now tilts to two shooters for shots 1-3 vs. 4-8. But there are other options to consider first (two different types of ammo? Gun firing position?) before we say this is a done deal. ANY OTHER VIDEOS OUT THERE NEED TO BE BROUGHT TO THE MIX!
This audio analysis aligns with and supports the findings we have already presented from sources (labeled 2 and 4 in our analysis) located on the west side of AGR Building 6. So now we have multiple recordings from different locations indicating a substantial audio difference and that needs to be explained, as do many other things.
The Secret Service now has even more explaining to do, especially how and why Sniper Team #2 did not take a shot at Crooks before the shooting started.
Even more damning are questions about how and why Trump’s closest protection left him on the stage exposed even as police were swarming around AGR Building 6 with guns drawn and ordinary citizens were alarmed, yelling about a guy having a gun on the roof, and taking cover. I’ll have more about all of that in the next episode.
Then on Wednesday a video was released showing someone walking across the roof towards the spot where the accused shooter Crooks was supposedly located before shooting President Trump.
After analyzing this video further, it may show Crooks getting shot. The problem is, President Trump is still talking.
Apparently, James Copenhaver filmed the rooftop shooter getting killed. Nice..!
Weird part?
Trump is still speaking..So, who shot Trump’s ear?
The shooter inside American Glass.
The one in uniform.#UhOh #ThisChangesEverything #BangYoureDead pic.twitter.com/xUEibWBBLJ— John Cullen (@I_Am_JohnCullen) August 1, 2024
If Crooks was shot while President Trump was still talking, how could Crooks have shot Trump? If this is the case, then who shot President Trump?
I have contended from the start that Crooks, with his glasses and no scope could not have shot President Trump in the ear from 140 yards away.
Wouldn’t we have heard the shot if he was killed before the shots at Trump?
Wouldn’t we have heard the shot if he was killed before the shots at Trump? What are you asking here?
Not if a silencer was used. He could have been running away from someone pointing a gun at him or maybe he had already been shot.
I want to, but I cannot see, Crooks being shot.
I hear 3 shots then 5 shots, from different guns, followed by a sniper shot, and one more sniper shot 10 seconds later. If Crooks was shot early, it was a suppressed shot because it does not show up over the noise in the recordings. Maybe Martenson should look for that earlier in the recording.
It could be that Crooks was shot early, followed by shots to kill Trump from the first and second floor windows. Clearly after the first 3 shots Trump was down, so the next 5 were desperation shots with the target vanishing. Given the flash from a first floor window is late in the shooting, the first 3 shots would have come from the second floor.
The reporting here is great.
Seems funny people advertising on this comment section. Hope you’re making money off of them Joe.
I have a thought, I think whoever plan the assassination attempt took advantage of that young man’s mental disability and he thought he was there trying to help the Secret Service or whoever protect president Trump. Someone else shot at president Trump.
Asshole.
I think the video show the counter sniper on the roof fired once then lost control of his weapon and fired two more shots. If you watch closely his rifle moves to his right and then the end of the barrel pops up slightly for each extra shot.
It was Professor Plum in the Gazebo. Who cares anymore – live your life.
Plenty of people,thats who.
If it was someone close to you who was shot or killed you would be screaming bloody murder if those in charge of an investigation shrugged their shoulders and said ” fuk it..who cares, whats done is done . Go get a life RD..they’r dead, now move on.”
People like you are part of the problem in this coutry . Been better all around if you caught that stray bullet instead of that poor bastard with a family and a community he helps protect.
I have been surfing online more than 3 hours today yet I never found any interesting article like yours It is pretty worth enough for me In my opinion if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did the web will be much more useful than ever before
There needs to be audio re-enactment with several guns, several locations.
Suppressed/subsonic bolt action rifle included.
Analyze the results against the assassination recordings.
What a waste of words. It’s so simple that hardly anyone sees it, which is that what the kid had in mind to do was to commit suicide by police (which he succeeded in doing). Then the Democrat commies wasted no time in exploiting it with a flood of distractions, disinformation, speculation, and stupidity, in a big game of fun for ‘experts’ who love to hear themselves talk. But for all their talk, none of them have mentioned a word about whether or not the kid was on some sort of SSRI drug like Prozac. If he was you can be sure it will never be talked about in the media.
Shots 1, 2 & 3 cannot be from the same weapon as the later shots 4 thru 8. Pretty sure of that. Any “authority” that claims all 8 shots came from the same weapon is therefore lying. What about the van with Arizona plates? The cell phone data from someone visiting both Crook’s residence & an FBI office in D.C.? What about the 2 different ladder sizes, with the shorter ladder purchased earlier that day at a local Home Depot? How was it transported to the Butler Fairgrounds while riding a bicycle? How were the range finder, explosives, & remote detonator supplied to Crooks, or more likely: via one or more accomplices?
Let’s be honest, if there was a second shooter trump would be dead. Sorry but all this shows nothing and some of the videos being showing are altered
It’s obvious you need your head examined if you believe anything the Secret Service and FBI is dishing out.
Its like you read my mind You appear to know so much about this like you wrote the book in it or something I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home a little bit but other than that this is fantastic blog A great read Ill certainly be back
Somebody essentially help to make significantly articles Id state This is the first time I frequented your web page and up to now I surprised with the research you made to make this actual post incredible Fantastic job