News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Support Joe's Work

Subscribe

Help support Joe's work

Choose an amount

EXCLUSIVE: Highlights from Tina Peters’ Oct 16 Hearing – Is Judge Varholak Considering Sending Her Home?

Based on highlights below from Tina Peters’ hearing in Colorado yesterday, is Judge Varholak hinting at sending Tina home?

Guest post by Martel Maxim

Tina Peters’ case was an effort to portray her as a terrible criminal.  This was not true.  Tina had never been arrested before and was doing her job as the Mesa County Clerk in early 2021 by saving records of a recent election according to the law.

ADVERTISEMENT

But when Tine reported on anomalies and differences identified in results before and after an election system upgrade in her county, all hell broke loose.  Tina was vilified and shamed and indicted, arrested, and imprisoned. 

In her trial, the judge (Judge Barrett) made flawed statements in his efforts to imprison Peters.  He shared:

“You are a charlatan and you cannot help but lie as easy as it is for you to breathe. You betrayed your oath for no one other than you.  And this is what makes Mrs. Peters such a danger to our community.  It’s the position she held that has provided her the pulpit from which she can preach these lies, the undermining of our democratic process, the undermining of the belief and confidence in our election systems.

So the damage that is caused and continues to be caused is just as bad, if not worse, than the physical violence that this court sees on an all too regular basis. And it’s particularly damaging when those words come from someone who holds a position of influence like you. Every effort to undermine the integrity of our elections and the public’s trust in our institutions has been made by you. You’ve done it from that lectern. The voting public provided you with everything you’ve done has been to retain control influence. The damage is immeasurable. And every time it gets refuted, every time it’s shown to be false, just another tale is weaved.”

These comments showed the bias coming from the judge.  He was after the gold star mother and courageous woman who was just doing her job.

In a fair debate, we could easily pick apart ALL the statements above from Judge Barrett as being LIES based upon unfounded assumptions.  This all leads to the court hearing yesterday in Colorado.

ADVERTISEMENT

This was Judge Varholak’s court.  He appeared very focused during her hearing on whether or not Tina’s speech was dangerous enough induce violence.

Judge Barrett claimed that her speech was “just as bad, if not worse than the physical violence his court sees on an all too regular basis”, yet he offered ZERO substantiation for that claim.  Additionally, history has shown that ZERO violence EVER resulted from the information put forth from Tina Peters.  Her entire history is all contained on her website https://tinapeters.us/.

Too bad for the prosecution that Tina’s disclosures occurred after Jan 6, 2021, because they would have likely blamed that violence on her (which the Deep State orchestrated via paid provocateurs–but that’s a whole other story).  There’s NOTHING in any way, shape of form that resembles ANY type of violent response.

While Judge Varholak didn’t allow the Venezuelan Testimony from the actual programmers who claimed to write the software to cheat in our elections as a result of yesterday’s hearing, ironically at the same time MORE VENEZUELAN ELECTION MACHINE MALFEASANCE WAS JUST EXPOSED.

So, it looks like that perhaps within a week we will hear his ruling on whether Tina Peters was wrongly incarcerated for exercising her right to free speech.  Also, keep in mind, one’s exercise of free speech doesn’t depend upon whether the person exercising that right is telling the truth or not.  If it did, practically all MSM would be in serious trouble.

ALL that matters is whether or not free speech is dangerous in the form of fomenting physical violence/yelling fire in a theatre etc.  It will be interesting to see whether anything can be pulled out of a hat to claim that Tina did incite violence/yelled fire in a theatre.

ADVERTISEMENT

We will see if Judge Varholak sees Tina as the same risk that Judge Barrett claimed to see.  This is what is on the table. 

There were indications that Judge Varholak may see things differently than Judge Barrett.  If not, justice will be delayed and a good fearless woman will stay in prison for doing her job as Mesa County Clerk. 

91 thoughts on “EXCLUSIVE: Highlights from Tina Peters’ Oct 16 Hearing – Is Judge Varholak Considering Sending Her Home?”

  1. I don’t give a damn about Gaza or Ukraine or any of the other latrines occupying Trump’s attention. Tina Peters matters more than all of them.

      • I think, simply, because Tina Peters was charged and convicted for state crimes, not federal.

        The president can affect only federal crimes.

      • It's State vs. Federal! If it was a federal crime Trump would of already acted! Case in point!=

        "President Donald Trump has repeatedly called for the release of Tina Peters, the former Mesa County, Colorado clerk who was convicted in 2024 on multiple felony charges related to breaching voting equipment following the 2020 election.
        Trump has described Peters as a "brave and innocent Patriot" who was "tortured by Crooked Colorado politicians" and claimed she was targeted for allegedly uncovering Democratic election fraud, a claim unsupported by evidence."

        • "In May 2025, Trump directed the U.S. Department of Justice via social media to "take all necessary action to help secure the release" of Peters, whom he also referred to as a "hostage".
          The Justice Department subsequently filed motions supporting her federal habeas corpus request."

          • "On August 21, 2025, Trump renewed his demand, posting on Truth Social that Peters should be released "RIGHT NOW" and threatening to take "harsh measures" if she is not freed, though he did not specify what those measures might be.
            Legal experts and state officials note that Trump has no authority to pardon Peters, as she was convicted in state court on state charges,
            and that federal intervention in state elections administration is constitutionally limited."

      • A few months back, Trump said he would have already had her out of prison if it were under Fed Jurisdiction, but as it is under State Jurisdiction, there is nothing he can do but he has the DOJ looking to see if there is anything the Fed can do for Tina.

      • I live in Mesa County and what you say is true for the eastern half of Colorado…..get West of Vail/Avon and it gets better but…,…

        Mesa County government, City of Grand Junction government is becoming infested with West Coast transplants but worse, infested with cultists from that Utah cult. Utah sits about 25 miles west of Grand Junction and that influence here is stunning. Think nothing more than 100's of Mitt Romney wannabes in local government.

        The Grand Junction police department played step and fetch to these cultists and DA Rubenstein. Tina has always been well known here but Rubenstein went as far as to actually have her arrested out of a downtown bagel shop. Cuffs, perp walks and all.

        • Roger that. And what was done about Eric Coomer's apparent drunk driving incident? He received treatment that was 180 degrees opposite Tina's!

        • Grand Junction has become just another in the list of cities now considered to Democrat-run chit-holes. It’s off my RV travel list.

      • Colorado got too many Californians moving to the state stating in 1990, they ruined the state, gave it a gay governor and a far left liberal blue state.

  2. Tina must be freed, and Judge Barrett (any relation to Amy Comey?) should be given the same sentence he gave Tina – 9 years in prison!

  3. Dear Jesus, bind this evil that oppresses good people and restore your truth and justice God, and free Tina Peters and any other good people such as J6 prisoners. In Jesus name amen.

  4. We have to overhaul our court system so that bad judges can be thrown off the bench and rep-laced with honest judges. If you do some checking you will find most of the corrupt judges education was paid for by George Soros and those elected were funded by Soros. Soros and Schwab are 2 of the biggest criminals in the world.

  5. Judge Barrett's judicial statement is an opinion piece, not anything rooted in judicial evidence.

    This could have come straight out of MSNBC.

  6. One wonders if Tina P is released, will there be a gag stipulation included.

    After all, all Mrs Peter’s did was do the job she was hired to do and prevented from doing by the crook who imposed the “trusted build” data dump – illegal in its own right as the election data is to be maintained in original form for 24 (or more) months. The people responsible for giving Tina access to make the back up legally as per her positions responsibilities were ordered to refuse her requested access, thus blocking her ability to uphold the law.

    Prison should be for criminals, and in this case the criminal went free (after stealing her own tainted election)

  7. The shrill bias of this judge Barret tells us he wanted to make it plain he was under deadly threat. Any review, any Appeal, would see this and immediately reverse any decisions made. The sheer cowardice among our current crop of lawyers will be legendary. Allowing only these lawyers access to Election as a Judge must be halted. Return Americans from our many other Trades to those revered Seats. It was the Law 40 years ago. Makes me puke.

  8. So, why did you rehash the past and dismiss writing about the main reason that this federal judge is considering releasing Tina? Why dismiss 3000+ supporters who supported an amicus brief filed on Tina’s behalf? What a disservice this article is to those who worked so hard to make an argument on her behalf after her constitutional right were violated. Leaving out the “novel” amicus brief in this article for clicks is clearly disinformation and practices like this are a disservice to everyone.

    SAY HER NAME! TERPSEHORE MARAS

  9. Did Tina's words cause violence – trying to make our election free and fair – did her words cause Charlie Kirks murder did her words cause the left to try and kill President Trump twice – the only violent party is the dems, they hate America and the American people and will say and do (murder is not out of the question) to gain and keep power – power they no longer have and will not have for a very long time – conservatives watch out the dems/lefties are like a wounded animal

  10. TINA PETERS PERFORMED HER JOB, SHE DID NOTHING WRONG.

    THE ATTACK ON OUR ELECTION SYSTEM WAS BURIED WITH THIS CASE AND THIS JUDGE. BARRETT SHOULD BE JAILED AS PART OF THE COVER UP CONSPIRACY. WHEN THE ELECTION IS OVER TURNED… AND IT WILL BE… JUDGE BARRETT SHOULD BE IMPRISONED AS PART OF THE CORRUPT APPARATUS COVERING UP THIS ELECTION CRIME !!!

    JAIL JUDGE BARRETT FOR CORRUPTION AND CONSPIRACY !!! HE IS A TREASONOUS TRAITOR !!! HE DESERVES A HANGING !!!

  11. This is corrupt and oppressive political third world tactics and a very scary development! Even though this is a State matter, the implications and precedence illegally forced on Peters cannot be allowed to continue!!

  12. Every rational person in America who has followed this case at all, AVOIDS the entire state of Colorado and every public official from that sate.

    The criminal gang running that state sound to be dangerous fanatics, like Hitler, most likely. to do jump outs and damage innocent passersby, or even government employees just doing their jobs.

  13. Another liberal judge trying to stop anyone from exposing corruption of his system. The law is meaningless only his politics are important to intimidate obedience

  14. Just think, the demented murderer of that girl on the train was not even in jail for committing over 20 felonies, yet Peters is in jail for exposing a vote discrepancy! The judge who sent her to prison should be impeached.

  15. The whole democrat party is such scum nomatter where they are. How can you not believe Tina given all the corruption that has been exposed so far. She did NOT commit any crimes, she talked about them that is all. That was HER RIGHT to expose corruption. GET HER OUT OF JAIL.

  16. I am so sick of this persecution by liberal judges and authorities riding on the coattails of the Obama-Biden administrations. It is an abomination unto the Constitiution and unto the Lord God Almighty.

    Free Tina Peters!!!

    -Vietnam Vet, 68-69; Honest Metro Cop, retired—

  17. The Citizens of Colorado have a Constitutional Duty to remove a tyrannical Government, by force if necessary. I'd say the current Colorado government and judicial system qualify as a "Tyrannical Government".

  18. Judge Barrett sounds like he was bought. His statements are unbelievably irrational. He never even asked if she was doing her job according to state law, which she was.

  19. If there were collectively any number of Colorado men with full sacs, unseared consciences and righteous values, there would be a huge hole in the jail and no one would dare re-arrest her.

  20. So, were is our President now. Is there some reason he can't pardon Tina? Must be a way he can get around a state law? At least he could draw a lot of attention to this horrible judge.

  21. Trump should have pardoned her one day one! Very disappointed in him not doing so. Sadly all the true criminals who committed voter fraud willl not be held accountable.

    • Jena Griswold refuses to take responsibility for any of the numerous mishaps in her office including the posting of critical voter system passwords just before the election… now she's running for a second term…. I guess soros is very pleased with her.

  22. If he truly is HONORABLE…. he will send that woman HOME…. Stop this insanity… everyone knows there was Fraud in the 2020 Race….and I continue to PRAY that the TRUTH WILL COME OUT…but for now… This woman did what her Job description said to do…. Keep and Protect the Voting Machine Data….. It is also known that once the Voting Machines are UPDATED FOR THE NEXT ELECTION… THE PRESENT DATA IS LOST…. It had to be backup'd and SAVED…. It's suppose to be save for years… Why were they so anxious to Update the machine for the next Election…that was 2 years away??

  23. Judge Barrett's diatribe rings hollow. How could that pile of crap be used in a courtroom for sentencing?????

  24. Raid the f-ing jail and free her and DAMN the commie "judge" ! This hideous miscarriage of justice has gone on FAR too long!

  25. COLORADO SEEMS LIKE THEY ARE IN FULL REBELLION…….TREN DE RUNS CITIES………AND THEY WANT TO JAIL A COUNTY CLERK FOR DOING HER JOB ????……GOOD GRIEF.

  26. Corrupt judges need to face the ultimate penalty for their corruption.
    They deserve no mercy in any way, shape, or form.

  27. There must be a reason why President Trump refuses to help this poor woman. But I don’t know what that could possibly be. Trump is always two steps ahead, so I assume he has a plan for her.

    • it's a State charge, Federal has no control. Though the DOJ can investigate and bring charges. They better get on it…

  28. It appears that both of these Colorado Judges do not want to allow exculpatory evidence into their court room. The truth is out about the election fraud in Colorado but the powers to be want to ignore the First Amendment rights of its citizens and coverup the corruption of their elected officials. IMO

  29. Tina Peters is a Gold Star Mother!!! The lawfare being waged against her is absolutely unconstitutional, illegal, disgusting, and despicable. The election officials are deathly afraid of Ms. Peters exposing their massive election fraud crimes and ginormous election corruption. Something has to be done about the enormous judicial corruption and lawfare. American citizens cannot tolerate this.

  30. Tore Maras' Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Tina Peters' provided a unique perspective that may have influenced the judge, even if the judge didn’t allow the Venezuelan Testimony from the actual programmers who claimed to write the software to cheat in our elections.

  31. From all that she's suffered simply for trying to bring attention to a BLATANTLY STOLEN election – Crowns in Heaven await Tina Peters when she finally does move on from this world.

  32. Why do I feel that Judge Barrett's bank account might have several significant deposits courtesy of the CCP?

  33. These leftist judges have NEVER given any legitimate legal consideration for this false imprisonment. If a civil war does break out, avoid the noise. The courts need to be abolished. I've known people tossed in prison for frivolous ridiculous things which should have been thrown out. It's infuriating. If you don't have the money to fight a bad judge, you are permanently scarred and barred from employment, benefits, voting, guns, housing, banking, flying, traveling out of the country, etc. You are no longer allowed to be a human. All of your rights are taken, yet they claim those rights aren't necessarily constitutional? what?

  34. What I do know as a local government official is that you basically have to consult legal counsel before you do anything in the area of reform, and that’s usually not timely enough as in this case. Careerist/activists know this! There are so many laws you have never heard of that individual defenders of the system can and will wield as weapons to prevent transparency or upset their career thiefdoms and pet ideologies. Ms. Peters probably won’t get any mercy in the peoples’ republic of CO even if her actions were defendable which is surely arguable. She was just basically alone there. There’s just not enough integrity and genuine, good intent in so much of our governments so more people need to diligently and aggressively get involved and take their jurisdictions back, en masse.

  35. Thanks, Amy, for clarifying the situation.

    I agree in general that there's a problem the Trump administration is allowing to fester – it's allowing law officers (mainly Obama and Biden appointees) to operate illegally. Instead of repudiating these rogue judges, prosecutors etc., the administration merely appeals to higher courts for redress. While there are probably arguments for operating that way, time is quite short, and if the left is allowed to continue with illegal obstructions, everything could be lost by 2028, when Trump will be gone and his voters demoralized by the lack of progress in some areas.

    So I would be happy seeing US marshalls rescue Tina Peter. Presumably it won't be as heavy as the IDF rescuing Noa Argamani, when there were exchanges of fire.

  36. Just a heads up. I screenshotted all of your threatening posts to the FBI and the Florida Law Enforcement Division. You should expect a personal visit.

Comments are closed.