Eight Important Facts – NOT Opinions – That Totally Debunk the Human-Caused Global Warming Hypothesis | Joe Hoft

News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Eight Important Facts – NOT Opinions – That Totally Debunk the Human-Caused Global Warming Hypothesis

Eight Important Facts – NOT Opinions – That Totally Debunk the Human-Caused Global Warming Hypothesis

Guest Post by Lynne Balzer

1) The Global Warming “crisis” was once a global cooling “crisis”! In the 1960s the weather started cooling off from the
decades of warming that caused the 1930s dust bowl. But while the earth was cooling, the percentage of CO2 was rising at the same time. Carbon dioxide and overpopulation were blamed.

This Time Magazine cover is the tip of the iceberg. There were hundreds of articles and books predicting an ice age by the turn of the century. But when temperatures began to rise again in the 1980s, the climate fear mongers told us that the carbon dioxide we were emitting was causing the earth to warm up! In the same year Meryl Streep hosted a PBS documentary entitled, “Race to Save the Planet”. It predicted that by the year 2000 the world’s average temperature would be four degrees warmer. None of this happened.

2) It is impossible to disprove the global warming hypothesis. The following have been blamed on climate change: more heat waves but also more cold spells, more droughts but also more floods, less snow but also more snow, more mental illness and suicides, more alcoholism, more crime, more bugs, rats and bats, the civil war in Syria, more earthquakes and tsunamis. Whatever happens with the weather is blamed on climate change.

A recent CNN report claimed that global warming doesn’t always mean warming. “The term ’global warming’ confuses people, because it triggers thoughts about warmth, and it sort of lends itself to misinterpretation when it also impacts the cold,” declared Mike Hulme of the University of Cambridge.

A well known rule of science states, “if a theory can’t be disproved, it isn’t science.”

3) “Climategate”: in 2009 and 2011 thousands of emails between prominent American and British scientists pushing this hypothesis were leaked. One email reads, “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temperatures to each series for the last 20 years [the 1980s onward].” This referred to a graph constructed by Michael Mann of Penn State University which grossly exaggerated the threat they claimed existed.

The statistical methods Mann had used to create the uptick on the right side — which to some resembled a hockey stick — were first exposed as fundamentally flawed by Steve McIntyre, a Canadian statistician. This graph incorrectly showed that global temperatures had suddenly risen to their highest level in recorded history.

This icon of the Global Warming movement eliminated the Medieval Warm Period (1000 years ago) and the Little Ice Age (from the 1500s to the 1700s) from climate history. Their emails also revealed the shocking and ruthless methods these men
used to silence other scientists whose conclusions differed from theirs.

James Delingpole, a journalist at the UK Daily Telegraph, described this collection of emails as “conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possible illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.” To deflect the blame from these
corrupt scientists, several media outlets blamed the Russians for hacking the emails.

This revelation should have ended the climate-alarmist fiasco. But because the media covered up the affair, most people have no idea that this important information ever surfaced!

4) TRILLIONS of dollars have been spent on grants for alarmist scientists, trips for elites in their private jets to climate conferences, huge subsidies (paid by taxpayers) for EVs and solar panel and wind farms that take up huge land areas and are
literally destroying wildlife and the environment. Well-placed individuals reaping the cash rewards of this deception – wind
farms and carbon trading – have made fortunes. The main spokesman, Al Gore, increased his net worth from $1.7 million to $330 million from his investments in “green” energy. His documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, claimed that melting in West
Antarctica or Greenland would cause a twenty-foot sea level increase in the near future. Actually the sea level is increasing by about 1 millimeter per year, the thickness of your fingernail, or seven inches per century. This is verified by NOAA.

Between 2005 and 2017 no major hurricanes hit the coast of the United States, setting a record for the longest period of time with no category-3 or greater hurricanes. For decades scientists have been handsomely paid with government grants to push the human-generated climate crisis narrative. If they say there’s no problem, their grants will be discontinued and they’ll be out of a job.

Figure 3: “An Inconvenient Truth”

5) Most scientists do not believe there is a climate crisis. Recently a Nobel prize winning physicist, John Clouser, declared, “The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.”

Another prominent scientist, Hal Lewis, called it “the greatest and most successful fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.” In the 2007 Global Warming Petition project 31,487 scientists declared, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing, or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Some scientists, fearful of losing their jobs, waited till they retired to speak out.

6) Carbon dioxide is NOT the main “greenhouse gas”. It comprises only about four hundredths of a percent (0.0415%) of the atmosphere. The main greenhouse gas, water vapor, is 70-100 times more powerful in holding atmospheric heat. Yet, in a Google search for pie graphs showing this, 99.9% show incorrect graphs such as this. Can you see what’s wrong with it?

The correct graph should look like the one below:

Figure 4: EPA.gov

7) Blaming methane and nitrous oxide for contributing to climate change is now being used as an excuse to steal farms from their owners and otherwise (under ESG mandates) destroy agriculture. Yet the truth is that the incidence of methane is just TWO parts per million, totally insignificant. This graph shows the small effect of carbon dioxide and the truly minuscule effect of methane and nitrous oxide compared to water vapor.

Vegan alarmists have demonized these gases to force farmers to get rid of their cows, goats and sheep, to be replaced by lab “meat”. Because methane is produced in the growing of rice, policy makers want to forbid farmers from growing this crop that is a staple of half of the world’s people.

The US and the European Union pressured over 100 nations to pledge to reduce the amount of methane and nitrous oxide in their countries a whopping 30% by the year 2030. If these nations actually go through with their promise, millions of people could starve. This is already happening in Sri Lanka, Ghana and South Africa.

8) The earth is noticeably greener – evidenced in satellite photos – as a result of the slight increase in carbon dioxide. Because CO2 is vital for photosynthesis, which keeps us alive, the small increase in this trace gas has been a boon to agricultural production.

Plants grow faster, absorbing more CO2 in the process. These are well-documented FACTS – not theories or predictions – which prove that the “climate emergency” is a total scam promoted for the sake of money and power by those currently governing our world.
********************
Hundreds of fascinating facts like these can be found in Lynne Balzer’s richly illustrated book, Exposing the Great Climate Change Lie, available on Amazon.

24 thoughts on “Eight Important Facts – NOT Opinions – That Totally Debunk the Human-Caused Global Warming Hypothesis”

  1. If I pointed out that most of the people driving the climate hoaxary just happen to be Jewish, would I then become thy enemy for speaking the truth?

    Reply
    • What percentage of climate crisis skeptics are also Jewish? Like the heroic Tony Heller? In fact, maybe the Jewish part really doesn’t matter so much.

      Reply
  2. Thank you for pointing out the obvious that the radical climatologist do not want us to get our heads around their conspiracy. We knew at the outset of this phony Global Warming idiocy, that something was amiss.

    All I had to do was take a look at Google Earth as you drill in and out. You begin to see that humans are so puny on the face of our globe it is impossible to blame us for anything weather related. Then those studying the Sun realized that it is the SUN that determines our weather, not we humans. PERIOD !!!

    Reply
  3. 112 Years ago Francis Molena of Popular Mechanics said, “The year of 1911 will long be remembered for the violence of its weather.. a torrid wave of unparalleled severity swept over the country. Cities baked and gasped for breath.. The average temperature of 1878 was as high as that of 1911.. causes of the changes.. as interesting as the changes..may be questioned whether we can not control the climate in the future. In fact, a theory has been elaborated, primarily by the great Swedish scientist Arrhenius, that the earth has had a warm climate when the amount of carbon dioxide in the air was abundant, and a cold climate when it was scarce. Since burning coal produces carbon dioxide..the enormous use of that fuel in modern times and consequently indirectly raising the temperature of the Earth.”

    **This article could have been written yesterday word for word….

    Reply
  4. Is there a way to send an email to Ms. Balzer? I wanted to ask about the effects of “astro mechanics.” I’ve searched her name and I wasn’t able to find a way to contact her. I don’t know if she’s affiliated with a university, think tank, etc.

    Thanks,

    Josh Nacey
    Kentucky

    Reply
  5. For my money, you are completely overlooking the #1 most obvious and critically important to understand basis of the climate scam. Scam-math.

    The claim right on the NOAA website is that ‘Scientists’ have calculated the Global Mean Daily Mean temperature FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET….and that it is precise to 1/100th of degree Fahrenheit. Then they take these Global Mean Daily Means and derive a Global Mean Annual Mean. Again this number, they are claiming, is precise to 1/100th of a degree Fahrenheit. But if you look at NOAA weather station data, you will find that they measure the temps to a 1/10th of a degree precision.

    If you measure to 1/10th of a degree precision, you can not say whether 90.0 degrees was actually 89.96 or 90.05 So, real science would say the “Global Mean Daily Mean (which requires tens of thousands of data points to create) was 90.0 degrees +or- a few degrees in precision, just for rounding error.

    But then there are other issues. Every day, some portion of the NOAA weather stations are not functioning. So to complete this data the ‘Scientists’ EXTRAPOLATE the temps for that weather station by looking at surrounding weather stations and assuming what the temp PROBABLY WAS at that position. Again…they are doing this to a 1/10th of a degree precision based upon assumptions. If it was 92.1 in Charleston at 10am and it was 93.4 in St. Augustine and it was 91.5 in Gainesville we have selected 93.2 for Jacksonville. In their science they call these Spatial and Temporal gaps in the Climate Record. places and times with no real data. But the bottom line again is that the effect of these missing data points on the assumed precision of the final product, a massive calculation to derive a Global Average of Local Averages to a day, month or year down to 1/100th of a degree precision, is simply a fraud.

    Reply
  6. Points are not clearly named, listed in short labels, or described in 6th grade English, hence impossible for executives to remember. If one outlines the argument, it is not eight points (try it yourself).

    Reply
  7. We’ve known these things for a very long time, but the media is for the most part our enemy as much as the climate cultists and progressive socialist politicians. The real reason for this push to deny the world’s population of food, fuel, housing is as simple as it is infuriating and horrifying: they want the majority of the population DEAD.

    That’s not an exaggeration. It’s the truth. These progressive socialists believe that if the numbers of people are small enough around the world, the remaining numbers will be compliant because they will depend, as in NEED, the ‘elites’ to feed, clothe, and house them. These progressive socialists envision themselves as the kings, rulers, dictators, whatever, of the planet and nothing will be done without their say-so.

    Of course, SANE people know that entire genocidal plan is ridiculous on it’s face. It can never and will never happen. Destruction very well may happen, but their ability to control the remaining population will not materialize. Has anyone told these giant brains that they need people to control the remaining people in the same proportion or larger than what they have today controlling the most intensively socialist countries on Earth? If the numbers are small, and the numbers of ‘elites’ are even smaller, who is to say that the ‘elites’ foot soldiers wont just rub them out and take over for themselves? It’s happened before hundreds of times throughout history around the world.

    The bottom line is that these progressive socialist control freaks and dictator wannabees are sick in the head, evil, insane, stupid, ignorant, and should be nowhere near any seat of power, but because people in general are both greedy and lazy, these progressive socialists ARE in the seats of power in too many places around the world. If you don’t want the world to end soon, you better hop on board and remove these people from power ASAP.

    I think it’s a little too late for that now however. Mankind’s future is marked and measured already, and it’s not a good one. The next decade will see that population decimation the leftists want, but in the end they’ll have no power at all.

    By 2032 at the VERY latest, this Earth and it’s population will look very, very different, I guarantee it.

    Reply
  8. The truth is, democrats are fear mongers. They want money, power and control. They are fascists and demand obedience. Obey or die, is their desire.

    Reply
  9. Nobody knows any CLIMATE HISTORY. The Forbidden Science.
    Removal of CO2 is never mentioned. Landfills (>90% cellulose), plowing farm fields burying cellulose, ocean plankton to Limestone (CaCO3).

    Take all the CO2 in LIMESTONE (CaCO3) in the crust of the earth and release it into the atmosphere. You would have an atmosphere more than 10 times the mass of the current atmosphere. Splane dat. Abiotic Methane releases from faults and mud volcanoes during the times of the most limestone formation . Methane + O2 + Ca > > Limestone + water.
    Thomas Gold. guest lecturer at NMIMT to VLA staff, 1979.

    Do the math (excel) for mass of atmosphere: 14.2 pounds per square inch, Diameter of earth 4000 miles, area = 4 pi R squared, 144 sq inches/sq ft, 5280 ft/mile, = 5,731,000 Giga tons, x 0.4% CO2,
    tons of coal mined = ?
    tons of oil burned = ?
    tons of Abiotic methane released = ?

    Climate History = Last Glacial Maximum 20,000 years, Sea Level -400 feet, Sahara desert > 2x as large, humans walked from Asia to South America,
    Asteroids hit the moon and six times as many hit the earth and caused huge floods and extinctions.

    Where does the co2 go at night and on cool days if only co2 controls temperature?

    And remember: You can keep your doctor.

    Reply
  10. You may as well just forget and just do what makes sense for your life right away because I know that you’re going through something that is going on right away but you have a good day at school tomorrow so you don’t get upset

    Reply
  11. it’s a perfect storm of avarice and power seeking. The “scientists” started it to gin up grant money. After a while the pols saw it as a way to curtail our freedoms and increase their power over us.

    Then the millionaire/billionaire class saw it as a vehicle to their future world vision where they kill off about 80% or so of us and put us in serf like Middle Ages culture while they live a life of luxury like some dystopic scifi novel.

    The only thing that will stop this is total commitment to destroy them. Start with the Fifth Column media.

    Reply
  12. Focusing on one factor, CO2, alarmists discount themselves. Their hyperbole is too simplistic for the many other factors going into the weather. Solar output along with Earth’s orbital position, axis tilt and wobble are a few never mentioned. Then there are the oceanic mixings and volcanoes to name a couple more. 1-s2.0-S1674987116300305-main.pdf from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987116300305?via%3Dihub provides some insight worth considering too.

    The National Weather Service is fine for a few days at a time, but can’t foresee changes to their projections, such as it being 5 degrees warmer yesterday after being much closer the previous few days.

    Reply
  13. Pretty good summary that I will recommend tomorrow on my blog with a different more accurate title, The article does NOT debunk human caused global warming, although it does list many examples of climate misinformation.

    two comments:

    “5) Most scientists do not believe there is a climate crisis.”

    Most scientists believe manmade CO2 emissions will cause a climate crisis (59% in 2022 poll). I have no idea how many think there is a climate crisis now.

    (6) ” in a Google search for pie graphs showing this, 99.9% show incorrect graphs such as this” (a chart showing US greenhouse gas emissions is compared with a chart showing all gases involved in the entire greenhouse effect).

    The US graph is about CHANGES in the greenhouse effect, which would be caused by one nation’s emissions, while the other chart is the TOTAL greenhouse effect. They are both correct charts, so (6) does NOT debunk anything.

    Reply
  14. I have yet to see anybody give a full accounting of the history of the climate change global warming agenda. I understand there is an iron Mountain report and other source documents detailing the development of this communist plot to rule the world. I wish somebody would trace that history. Also there is so much more to be said on a factual basis that totally be debunks the whole global warming cooling climate change hysteria BS. This is a fundamental point that must be attacked to undermine the leverage of the far left which they are using to destroy this country and in an attempt to rule the world. Please keep up the good work!

    Reply
  15. Your part that claims that between 2005 and 2017 that no major hurricanes hit the United States is completely wrong. I lived through hurricane Katrina and Rita in 2005. Katrina hit Louisiana as a Cat 5 storm and Rita hit as a Cat 3 storm. In 2008, Ike hit Texas as a Cat 3 storm but it was so large that it flooded most of Louisiana’s coast with the storm surge. Please be truthful in your writings.

    Reply
  16. You, (i), can’t trust those who are educated to display honesty with the truth which allows them to be self servant for whatever gratification they can obtain.

    Reply

Leave a Comment