DEEP STATE TRUMP INDICTMENT – Created by Corrupt Weissmann and Eisen, It Ignores the Law with Limited Mention of President Trump’s Right to Presidential Records Act | Joe Hoft


Get The Latest


Get The Latest

DEEP STATE TRUMP INDICTMENT – Created by Corrupt Weissmann and Eisen, It Ignores the Law with Limited Mention of President Trump’s Right to Presidential Records Act

Weissmann and Eisen are at it again.  Biden commits the crime, Trump does the time. 

The corrupt and evil DOJ actors from the Obama, Biden, and Hillary gangs will not stop.  Tonight they announced that President Trump is being indicted for crimes while literally ignoring the law.

This is a communist and fascist takeover of the United States.

President Trump shared on Truth Social:

Page 1: The corrupt Biden Administration has informed my attorneys that I have been Indicted, seemingly over the Boxes Hoax, even though Joe Biden has 1850 Boxes at the University of Delaware, additional Boxes in Chinatown, D.C., with even more Boxes at the University of Pennsylvania, and documents strewn all over his garage floor where he parks his Corvette, and which is “secured” by only a garage door that is paper thin, and open much of the time.

Page 2: I have been summoned to appear at the Federal Courthouse in Miami on Tuesday, at 3 PM. I never thought it possible that such a thing could happen to a former President of the United States, who received far more votes than any sitting President in the History of our Country, and is currently leading, by far, all Candidates, both Democrat and Republican, in Polls of the 2024 Presidential Election. I AM AN INNOCENT MAN!

Page 3: This is indeed a DARK DAY for the United States of America. We are a Country in serious and rapid Decline, but together we will Make America Great Again!

Over the weekend corrupt Deep State actors from the Obama, Biden, and Hillary gangs released a report that outlined an indictment of President Trump.  This BS document full of garbage accusations ignores the TRUTH and Trump’s right to the Presidential Records Act.

The document refers to NYT’s Maggie Haberman 53 times but never once mentions the Clinton socks case that Obama Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that the President Clinton could take whatever he wanted when he left office. [See Mike Davis interview below.]

The Clintons are referred to 76 times with Weissmann and Eisen mostly discussing Hillary’s emails claiming her actions were fine related to documents when compared to President Trump’s omitting the reality that President Trump has the Presidential Records Act and Hillary did not –

Whereas both Clinton and Trump retained documents not in government-approved locations, Clinton’s emails were made and retained in furtherance of official duties, whereas Trump’s retention of the documents was in direct contravention of the PRA – and in defiance of repeated official requests that he return them…

…In contrast to Clinton’s use of the emails for government purposes to perform her duties as Secretary of State, Trump had no justification as former President to retain or use the documents at MAL. Indeed, he has never publicly stated any reason for retaining the documents. In short, Trump’s willfulness and extensive malfeasance turns what might have potentially been a noncriminal misstep into what now should be a criminal indictment.

Weissmann and Eisen go on to briefly discuss President Trump’s rights under the Presidential Records Act and omit Obama Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s name:

In his filings, Trump relies heavily on dicta from a single case, Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives & Resources Administration, 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012), to contend that the categorization of personal and Presidential records is committed to the President’s “sole discretion,” with no place for judicial review.458 That decision considered a somewhat different question than presented here, as it arose from a lawsuit by a third party seeking a declaration that
certain audio recordings created by President Clinton should have been categorized as Presidential records (as opposed to personal) and an order compelling NARA to assume custody of the tapes.459 And the decision was not as clear cut as Trump suggests. For one, the court acknowledged D.C. Circuit precedent providing for limited judicial review of “the initial classification of existing materials” under the PRA.460 And although it made numerous statements in dicta about the discretion afforded to a President to categorize documents under the PRA, the Judicial Watch court ultimately did not need to reach the issue of judicial review, because the relief the plaintiff sought was “not available under the PRA.”461 Moreover, Trump’s position ignores that other courts have specifically held that it may be permissible to conduct “judicial review of a decision to denominate certain materials ‘personal records’ of a former President.”462 That decision explained, in reasoning applicable to Trump’s case, that “[s]uch judicial review may be available to ensure that Presidential records are not disposed of as personal records at the end of an Administration and that, instead, all Presidential records fall subject to the Archivist’s ‘affirmative duty to make such records available to the public.’”

Andrew Weissmann behind the corrupt Mueller Special Counsel and Norm Eisen, Barack Obama’s Ethics Czar are behind this criminal effort to use lawfare to attack President Trump for crimes that he did not commit.  These people are outright political goons.

Their report can be seen here.  Weissmann and Eisen are listed as authors along with others, including a Brit by the name of Sevin Watt.  [What is a Brit doing in this type of report?]

This is evidently what is being used by the corrupt DOJ, led by sadistic actor Jack Smith to indict President Trump.

Here is the document.

Just Security Model Prosecu… by Just Security

A point that was reported a week ago is that the corrupt DOJ says President Trump had classified documents [which again is his perogative] but they won’t tell him what they are.  This is a standard Weissmann move:

…despite the standard process that has been in place for the prior four administrations, the NARA refused to participate in the collection of any documents from the White House during the transition phase following the November 2020 election.

The NARA refused to assist in the collection of the Trump records for national archive holding and review, and then the NARA triggered a sequence of events that led to the DOJ using a reference from the NARA, to weaponize a process they refused to engage in.  The NARA refused to do their specialized bureaucratic job, and then the NARA used what they defined as an incomplete job as a reason to refer the outcome to the DOJ.   The details are quite interesting.

The letter details how the DOJ-NSD then weaponized the process, fought with the FBI investigative and supervisory agents who were saying Trump was doing nothing wrong, and then culminating in a documented lie to the Florida magistrate, in order to get a politically motivated search warrant.

The DOJ will not release the documents they used to convince the judge to obtain the warrant.  Additionally, the DOJ will not release a list of the documents, or even describe the documents, they later claimed are classified.   To this date, the Trump defense team is being told President Trump held classified documents, yet the DOJ will not describe to the lawyers who represent President Trump, what those classified documents are.

Attorney Mike Davis was on the War Room today to discuss what BS this case is.

Another point is that today it was reported that the FBI had a document and a whistle blower who shared that Joe Biden, while VP, took $5 million from Burisma in the Ukraine along with his son Hunter Biden.

Many believe that this is why the indictment against President Trump occurred today – to cover up Biden’s crimes.


Leave a Comment