Current Affairs Editor Attacks Candace Owens and Claims Decay of the American Brain
Republished with permission from AbleChild.
This week’s Current Affairs magazine features an article about Conservative podcaster Candace Owens, who author Nathan J. Robinson suggests is so out of her mind and is “on another level entirely,” and that “many of her proclamations are so bizarre, they seem better described as “symptoms” than ideas.”
Robinson has a PhD in sociology from Harvard and a JD from Yale Law School, so he at least gets credit for being a dedicated student. But the article reads like a purposeful hit piece rather than a considerate discussion of any fact busting on Robinson’s part. Actually, the entire piece is one big whine. That’s right, Robinson, who wrote the book Why You Should Be a Socialist, and is the Editor-in-Chief of Current Affairs, wastes about 3,000 words whining to readers about what he thinks is crazy about Owens but, oddly enough, does not provide any proof – no factual data – that what Owen’s believes is incorrect.
But Robinson gives away his real intent in the article’s subtitle when he writes “What does it say about us that Owens is listened to by anyone other than a psychiatrist?” It’s not funny but it is interesting that Robinson would use psychiatry as something that is connected to Owens and those who listen to the podcast and opinions of the podcaster. Afterall, Robinson surely is aware that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM) is not based in science, and many would argue that singular book has done incalculable harm.
So, let’s consider for a moment the fact that one in four American adults take at least one prescription psychiatric drug just to be able to function. The fact that millions of American adults cannot function without mind-altering drugs isn’t funny, but it is important to discuss the fraud of the psychiatric diagnosis that was necessary to get the drugs.
That’s right. The modern mental health model of diagnose and drug has finally been outed for its utter and complete failure. The fact is, nobody is getting better, they’re just getting more drugged. And while Robinson thinks writing the “psychiatrist” thing is funny, what Robinson fails to understand is psychiatric diagnosing is a fraud. There is no known abnormality for any psychiatric diagnosis. Rather, mental health disorders are made up lists of behaviors that the great and near great in psychiatry long ago voted in as abnormalities with a raised hand that needed to be “treated.”
For example, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) isn’t a disorder. There is no abnormality in the brain that is ADHD. It is, however, made up symptoms like “fails to give close attention to details, makes careless mistakes, doesn’t listen when spoken to directly, doesn’t follow tasks…” What five-year-old boy doesn’t exhibit these tendencies? It’s normal…not abnormal. However, because the APA deemed these behaviors, and others, abnormal, the “treatment” too often is serious mind-altering drugs like Ritalin and Adderall.
Ritalin and Adderall are stimulants (Methylphenidate and Amphetamine) and are considered by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to have a high potential for abuse and addiction and are classified as Schedule II controlled substances.
And while Robinson still thinks the “psychiatrist” schtick is funny, the psychiatry thing gets worse the more you know. For example, not only is there no abnormality for ADHD or any psychiatric disorder, the pharmaceutical companies that produce the drug “treatments” have no idea how the drugs work in the brain for any psychiatric diagnosis, including the alleged ADHD.
According to the package insert for Ritalin, “the mode of action in man is not completely understood, but Ritalin presumably activates…” blah, blah, blah. Clueless. “Not completely understood?” “Presumably?” Doesn’t sound good. Yet, millions of Americans have been prescribed Ritalin and other ADHD “treatment” that the makers, after decades of research, still have no idea how the drugs “work” as “treatment.”
What we do know, is that methylphenidate is the closest thing we have to cocaine and according to IQVia (formerly IMS Health) as of 2020 more than nine and a half million prescriptions were written for ADHD drugs in the US and nearly three million of them were prescribed to kids under the age of 17. Most disturbing was that more than 300 of those prescriptions were written for children less than one year old.
But Robinson continues with the crazy schtick when he writes “how can someone so delusional attract an audience of millions, and what does it say about our country.” “Delusional?” Robinson has written often in support of trans rights issues and, while Able Child does not advocate either way on the issue, the argument has been made that thinking and believing that one is the opposite sex than what is identified at birth could be called “delusional.” Couldn’t Robinson’s question “how can someone so delusional attract an audience of millions, and what does it say about our country” just as easily be applied to his support of the trans community?
AbleChild has, however, spent a great deal of time investigating the Sandy Hook shooting and will respond to Robinson’s remarks that “she’s (Owens) basically occupying the same lane as Alex Jones, who has been sued into financial oblivion by the grieving Sandy Hook families he defamed.” Yes, the radio host was sued by the Sandy Hook families who won in what many argue was a biased court.
Nevertheless, rather than defend Jones, AbleChild would suggest that Robinson take the time to read the very lengthy investigation of Sandy Hook. He may find it of interest, and of which no news organizations speak, that none of the more than 150 projectiles recovered from the shooting could be matched to the alleged weapon. That’s important physical evidence that no one bothers to discuss…even the family members. So, before Robinson and others decide to use Jones as their whipping boy of false information, one might suggest that they take the time to read the investigations. There is a wealth of information that goes beyond just reading the summary.
Of course, at the end of the day, what is important is that Robinson should be careful about suggesting people are crazy because they believe something others may not. After all it was Charlie Kirk who said, “you should be allowed to say outrageous things.” Time will tell who is right. But, in the meantime, Robinson might want to think about how crazy it is to give psychiatry credibility when there is no abnormality for any mental disorder. As Charlie would say…”prove me wrong.”
Be the Voice for the Voiceless
AbleChild is a 501(3) C nonprofit organization that has recently co-written landmark legislation in Tennessee, setting a national precedent for transparency and accountability in the intersection of mental health, pharmaceutical practices, and public safety.
What you can do. Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!
Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive. As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.
He got the jew call from Bibi. Its a concentrated effort to discredit her.
Well, if Current Affairs criticizes Candace,, then Candace is (and has been) over the target.
Psychiatrist is the only professional that never fixes anything.
& the last thing anybody needs is a "diagnosis" from somebody who is themselves nuts
QUERY—————– CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHAT "NEGRO AFRICAN VALUES" HAS EVER CHAMPIONED "WHITE AMERICAN VALUES" HERE IN THE USA?
I BELIEVE I AM WELL READ IN THE HISTORY OF THIS NATION HAVING ACCESSED THE "BOWELS" OF LIBRARIES TO FIND RARE EARLY HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN SOCIETIES.
==
NOTHING IS SAID ABOUT "NEGRO AFRICAN VALUES" THAT ADDS TO BRITISH, GREEK, ROMAN AND EARLY TEUTONIC VALUES WE LIVE UNDER.
NOTHING! JUST SAYING AS TO WHAT COMES OUT OF HER MOUTH.
You sound like President Wilson when you write.
Wilson had some things right, but our entry into WW1 and the Federal Reserve makes him THE worse president ever. Worse than sleepy Joe and Barak O.
"Sleepy Joe and Barky O" is a good line for potry.
I was thinking more of his adoration and support of the KKK.
I sound like Tommy? NEVER………….Tommy may have sounded like me, but he was a RACIST and Woman Hater.
Funny how you can’t refute my comment, you might be more believable.
That’s a misquote.
What is a misquote? Where am I wrong? Last chance.
So the only difference between you and Woody are your thoughts on women?
No.
— TROLL — values!
— BLOCKED —
the same with Judeo-Christian. That's nonsense. The former wants the latter destroyed. They take advantage of Christian values to our detriment.
What values are you talking about, like the 10 Commandments?
well…
1) The US does not have a state religion and allows the free practice of any religion
2) The US has freedom of speech which allows you to take the Lord's name in vain.
3) The US doesn't mandate the sabbath. abandoned blue laws
4) The US doesn't require you to honor your mother and father – it's actually the opposite. The state takes power from parents
5) No country permits killing without cause – not sure this one is specific to Judaism lol
6) Adultery – you can cheat all you want and we have no fault divorce – again not specific to Judaism
7) Stealing – same as killing, but many US states have allowed petty theft up to $950.
8) Bearing false witness – people lie about others all the time without being punished, Our news and politicians lie to us constantly
9) Coveting wives – we're the most pornographic nation on Earth.
10) Coveting goods – we're the most coveting of goods in the wor
Not killing and stealing are not specific to Judaism or Christianity. By the way, Judaism is much more than the Old Testament. They have other books that I can't list without the censors. These are abhorrent to Christianity.
unfortunately, many who gravitate to the mental health fields have mental health issues they seek to remedy. What happens is they normalize pathology so they're no longer considered mentally ill.
She is an attention ho, there I just saved her a ton of money on a psychiatrist…..
100%
Ironic that the Current Affairs editor calls Candice insane when the average Current Affairs follower is a low IQ, easily manipulated, gullible, reality denier that no doubt thinks global warming is real, Biden won in 2020 fair and square and transgenderism is just the natural evolution of the human race.
Well considering her target is dolts that believe every single word she says, then yes, she is over the target.
What target? Where? Have you heard her interviews? She won't gives specifics on anything. And when it all blows over, she'll claim she never said anything about anyone, and has no idea what target you are taking about.
I rest my case. Seems some conservative circles are wiling to let her bring down the whole ship. Leftists are evil, but often win because conservatives are stupid.
what ship? = you are not on my ship
Leftists always claim one whack job represents all conservatives. Sorry. Candace doesnt speak for me.
I feel exactly the same way about all the Israeli spies in the US. The list is too long to write down here, but some of them are right here in the peanut gallery.
Congrats. You're a willing but naive jihadist puppet.
All the Muslims you people have imported into this country can go back to the desert with you.
It might be over your head. You don’t get it.
Obviously they're a low information commenter.
And you’re obviously low IQ
I used to like Candace, but as time goes by I think that she is going off on some strange direction. Maybe the Martians got to her.
go back to sleep
Bots never sleep.
You keep spamming with the same remark, you must be a CCP Bot.
because it apply to morons like you. nap time for the inept,
>evaluate this article for logical fallacies
ChatGPT-5.2: The JoeHoft/AbleChild piece relies heavily on rhetorical attacks and sweeping claims that don’t follow from the evidence it provides, plus several “whatabout” pivots away from the actual Current Affairs argument. It occasionally cites real documents (e.g., a Ritalin label) but repeatedly jumps from limited facts to broad conclusions about psychiatry, ADHD, and public discourse.
## Fallacies in the JoeHoft/AbleChild argument
– **Ad hominem / poisoning the well**: It frames Robinson’s article as a “purposeful hit piece,” “one big whine,” and implies bad faith instead of primarily engaging Robinson’s specific claims about Owens’ reasoning patterns.
– **Straw man**: It criticizes Robinson for “not provid[ing] any proof—no factual data—that what Owen’s believes is incorrect,” but Robinson’s piece is largely about Owens’ conspiracy reasoning style and includes concrete examples of her claims (e.g., the Brigitte Macron “transvestigation” and assorted conspiratorial inferences).
– **Non sequitur (topic switch)**: The article treats Robinson’s “psychiatrist” jab as an opening to argue “DSM is not based in science” and “psychiatric diagnosing is a fraud,” which doesn’t logically follow from (or refute) Robinson’s main point about Owens’ conspiracism.
– **Hasty generalization / sweeping conclusion**: It asserts “There is no known abnormality for any psychiatric diagnosis” and “nobody is getting better,” which are broad universal claims presented without supporting evidence in the piece itself.
– **Loaded language**: Phrases like “fraud,” “clueless,” and “mind-altering drugs” function persuasively but don’t substitute for argumentation; they encourage a conclusion without showing it.
– **Appeal to authority (credentialing as a feint)**: It mentions Robinson’s Harvard/Yale credentials, then uses that to tee up insinuations about intent (“whine,” “hit piece”) rather than assessing whether his reasoning and examples are sound.
– **Cherry-picking (selective quoting)**: It centers the “psychiatrist” line and largely sidesteps Robinson’s detailed examples of Owens’ alleged logical errors and conspiratorial inference-making.
– **Red herring (ADHD detour)**: The long section on ADHD, stimulants, and pharma “not knowing how drugs work” is mostly irrelevant to whether Robinson’s critique of Owens is valid; it changes the subject from Owens’ claims to psychiatry in general.
– **False analogy**: “What five-year-old boy doesn’t exhibit these tendencies?” treats a list of possible ADHD symptoms as if any presence of any item means “normal therefore not a disorder,” ignoring that diagnoses typically concern severity/impairment/persistence (the article doesn’t engage those distinctions).
– **Whataboutism / tu quoque**: It responds to Robinson calling Owens “delusional” by pointing to Robinson’s support for trans rights and suggesting that could be called “delusional,” which attacks Robinson’s consistency instead of addressing whether Owens’ specific claims are evidentially grounded.
– **Appeal to (alleged) suppressed evidence**: The Sandy Hook passage asserts dramatic forensic claims (“none of the more than 150 projectiles… could be matched to the alleged weapon”) while implying mainstream silence/bias, but provides no primary documentation inside the piece to justify the inference.
– **Appeal to time / “time will tell”**: It ends with “Time will tell who is right,” which postpones evaluation rather than meeting the burden of proof for the article’s own strong claims.
## Where Robinson’s framing can be criticized (without copying the same fallacies)
Robinson’s use of psychiatric language (“symptoms,” “psychiatrist”) is rhetorically loaded and can be seen as stigmatizing or substituting insult for careful argument in places, even though he does provide many examples of the conspiratorial “method” he’s criticizing.
He also attributes Owens’ popularity partly to Americans’ low critical reasoning and broader conservative beliefs, which risks overgeneralizing about audiences unless backed by strong evidence (he gestures at literacy decline and information ecosystem problems, but doesn’t fully prove the causal chain).
## A sharper way to evaluate it
– Identify each **claim** (Owens wrong; DSM unscientific; “nobody is getting better”; Sandy Hook ballistics claim), then ask what evidence the article *actually provides* for each.
– Separate “Robinson was mean/unfair” from “Robinson is factually wrong”: the first is about tone; the second needs rebuttal of his concrete examples of Owens’ reasoning.
– Watch for **burden-shifting** like “prove me wrong”: strong assertions still require strong support from the person asserting them.
Just FYI, no one's reading this. I got through 3 sentences.
thanks for feedback, here's a more concise version:
Here is the concise breakdown of the logical flaws in the Joe Hoft/AbleChild article:
### Core Problems
* **Attacks the Messenger, Not the Argument:** The article spends most of its time calling the author (Robinson) a "whiner" and mocking his credentials instead of disproving his specific examples of Candace Owens' false claims.
* **Changes the Subject:** Instead of defending Owens' ideas, it pivots to a long rant about psychiatry, ADHD, and "mind-altering drugs," which has nothing to do with whether Owens' conspiracy theories are true.
### Specific Logical Fallacies
* **Ad Hominem:** Dismisses the critique as a "hit piece" and a "whine" to avoid engaging with the actual evidence Robinson presented.
* **Straw Man:** Claims Robinson offered "no factual data," ignoring the specific examples of Owens' conspiracy reasoning (like the Brigitte Macron theory) that were in his original text.
* **Whataboutism:** Deflects the charge that Owens is "delusional" by pointing at Robinson's support for trans rights, essentially saying "you're crazy too" rather than proving Owens is sane.
* **False Analogy:** Argues that because normal kids have energy, ADHD diagnoses are fake. This ignores that medical diagnoses are based on severity and impairment, not just the presence of a behavior.
* **Hasty Generalization:** Makes huge, unsupported claims like "nobody is getting better" from psychiatric treatment without providing data to back it up.
* **Burden Shifting:** Ends with "prove me wrong," trying to force others to disprove their claims rather than providing evidence to support them.
LOL. I think you're a bot.
at least you agree the reasoning is sound!
I disagree with the reasoning, too.
ChatGPT is just algorithms written by leftists that use articles written by leftists.
The practical test is simple: ask it to argue both sides of the same issue, demand sources, and check the claims yourself.
ai is for reeet arrds
it can help improve your critical thinking and reasoning abilities, but if you're determined to be a fool, it won't make you wise.
what is erika's father's role with raytheon?
It's……. straight up your a$$ and to the left.
what is his role at raytheon?
what is raytheon?
Why is the sky blue?
look up raytheon
Good grief who doesn’t know what Raytheon is!?
what is her father's role in that company?
Who cares!
He worked in Facilities Dept. at one of there locations.
IDK, but her mother is Mossad… documented fact.
Backup your claim.
Candace Owens is Black and she is acting well within social norms for respectable Black people (if you know any and socialize privately with them over adult beverages and fried chicken this is fairly obvious).
The problem is she is online doing it in front of White people who forgot she is actually Black because she is more articulate and "clean" as Biden would put it.
She needs to be placed back into the context of what she actually is and the culture she actually comes from and her show taken from that point of view.
The problem is she dresses the part of a sophisticated White professional and she demands to be taken seriously as a "White" commentator with black skin while her show is actually done in deep Black culture.
Black people can have good shows and make good points in a humorous way within their own cultural norms and be protected by the fact that it is comedy and showmanship. But she needs to own that more if that's the show she is going to do.
Should we play, "Camptown Races", while she performs?
She did a dance to Hava Nagila to open her show a few days ago. She's so classy.
I saw that. CLASS.
So what are you trying to say, that it's a black cultural thing to play fast and loose with the truth for entertainment purposes? I'm genuinely curious.
Leftist troll. Ignore.
So you want Candace to speak in the spirit of 'dancing' or being an entertaining 'n…' ?
Fedslop Narrative Update: They are now going to claim that Kirk was struck by a frangible round- a bullet that disitegrates on impact, designed for law enforcement not to go through it's intended target and strike innocents. Apparently the surgeon who worked on CK has denied saying that the bullet was stopped by his neck bone. Just a heads-up…
the old ice bullet
Owens is looking for attention. She was knocking the hell out of Trump until 2016 then got on his bandwagon. She was associated with Turning Point then left and has been bad mouthing them. Owens is all over the place.
Another hit piece. How charming.
Decay of the American Brain—what a bold concept. I was expecting content about Fluoride in the water, metals in vaccines, metallic nanoparticles in the air, microwave radiation mental impacts, incessant propagandization, and indoctrination in schools…. And all I got was Candice Owens content.
Candace is guilty of doing one thing: asking questions that those in power don't want to be asked. Traditionally that was the job of the press, but since the press are now simps of power, it's now up to us and the Candace's of society.
She is asking certain questions, to a certain end. Most people will stop when most questions are answered but she will continue until she gets the end she wants. Which means she will never quit.
Precisely. Asking questions + avoiding answers = $$
Notice how she isn’t asking any questions about Robinson, who his friends are, where his furry boyfriend went, was anyone at the university involved. That would be interesting.
"Robinson" was the dupe, as are you.
Answers are wider and deeper, but they will come out.
I find that very very difficult to believe. Of course you can pick any good option apart if it doesn’t get who you want got.
You can't "believe" what you don't know. Facts help.
What are the facts? And please don’t tell me to go watch her ridiculous podcasts. Someone somewhere must have a credible list.
Fred: She is'nt asking X question
User: actually she is asking those questions in her shows
Fred: No she isn't, I've never watched hers show and dont ask me to watch her shows
loser.
Easily TENS are engaged, if not SCORES.
Only an idiot would close their eyes and say OK to all the incongruities.
List please
Go do your own homework — AH.
— BLOCKED —
Vagaries, innuendo and anomalies strung together as to appear as evidence to these simpletons, they'll never admit to being this stupid, these are the climate changers, the vax'd, boosted and masked on their latest crusade of ignorance.
Ridiculous? I think from watching a few of her podcasts, I have learned alot about how the media and their cohorts team up to destroy a person who doesn't follow the narrative. Quite fascinating!!
Why do you find that very very difficult to believe that Robinson was the dupe/patsy? And with, "Of course you can pick any good option apart if it doesn't get who you want" do you honestly believe that this is what Owens is doing? Putting her career on the line, her safety, the threats made against her, the lies being told, the countless accusations being hurled against her, her sanity being questioned, the endless barage of people who want her silenced, coming out of the woodwork like roaches? The bots, trolls sent out with their talking points, not to prove her wrong but to belittle and berate her. They did this to those who didn't tow the covid narrative. And look who turned out to be right?
Look, I just believe Robinson did it. He was there, he was on the roof, he was a part of a group of people that hated Charlie. There may have been others involved but I don’t think it was any foreign country. They have their own problems. We will see what happens at the trial in May which will be public from what I understand.
Okay. You believe Robinson did it. That's fine. But there are people out there that do not believe the story being told. They are no different than you believing Tyler Robinson did it. And if questions are not raised, and if all leads are not investigated/followed through, how on Earth are you to get through to the truth of what happened that day and the people who were involved? Governments have been known to lie throughout history, they are after all, made up and occupied by man.
Well it’s the reason we have governments. They aren’t perfect but we vote and set things up that way. Otherwise it would be chaos. Nothing wrong with asking questions of course. I just think the evidence points to Robinson.
Why not? A confession. The evidence. The motive. The weapon. All so conveniently packaged. Fastest who done it in history! And here's why questions need to be asked. They aren't perfect! And man can become a host of good for mankind and a host of evil that destroys mankind. I think we are at the point of evil that destroys mankind.
I just watched a video by Matt Walsh it’s pretty good you should look for it on YouTube. He lays out all the evidence for the killer being Robinson. There is a lot of it
I will look for that video. Thanks.
Just so you know, I cancelled Matt Walsh. And again, of course all the evidence points to Tyler Robinson. So neatly packaged.
Well I thought it was pretty well done. So why can’t Candace make a video like that? Neatly packaged, with all her evidence instead of it flying all over the place. She would have more credibility.
Actually she is asking those question, you prove you watch none of her podcasts.
Going after the wife of man who just got murdered is in poor taste imo, prefect for the low-class American. I would have told her to go to hell!
Going after the wife of man who just got murdered is in poor taste imo, prefect for the low-class American. I would have told her to go to hell!
— The "wife" is in on it.
HUNGARY
When did Candace Owens go after Erika Kirk? She has been steadfast in her corner since the assassination. Asking questions isn't a crime. The idea that one cannot ask questions is ludicrous. I would think that Erika Kirk is grateful that Charlie Kirk had such a goodfriend in Candace Owens. Asking the questions that she may not be able to/or ready to ask at this time.
asking questions in a way as to imply someone did something or was involved in something isn't just asking questions
Who? What? When? Where? Why? and How? That is what Owens is asking.
Maybe bc she knows it's a waste of time? Remember, the whole reason they are after her is bc she does not believe the narrative they want everyone to believe. She is asking questions the media refuses to ask. They are mum. Like, do you believe everything you hear or are told? You don't think on your own? You criticize the work and time she has put into this and yet not one person can debunk anything she has disclosed with factual evidence. Not one thing. Just smear her name. Evil people out there. Getting paid to keep quiet. Look the other way. Lie. Steal. Cheat. Murder. But God forbid, don't question anything. Just believe what you are told. We know better.
She talked to the family of the furry freak.
Zackly
30.06 my arse.
Robinson didn't ever fire a gun on the rooftop. The whole thing is a bungled cover up, and everybody in power is in on the cover up, and worse.
WORSE when we know what happened in HUNGARY, — "Millstone" worse.
HUNGRY…Ahh yes
… children, — for those who don't think …
The media says it was a 30-06, You're not one of those weirdos that believes in MSM fairy tales, are you? And you can forget investigative journalism it doesn't exist.
She's not asking legitimate questions. She's casting aspersion.
How many of her 40+ one-hour shows have you watched?
Lots of them.
I to watched many of her shows but it just got stupid the longer she talked.
Could say the same about you.
You are clearly unaware of the obvious holes in the official story. Why are you so afraid informing yourself?
Anyone who believes Candace Owens is uninformed. Nothing she says makes sense. Go listen to JWhit podcast, Bronson, etc. They will inform you.
All of the questions, accusations theories, etc are a direct result of our FBI not doing a legitimate investigation and telling the public what happened, in a way that is believable. Bullet fired from a 30-06 cartridge that supposedly created a entry wound but no exit wound is about as believable as the magic bullet that killed JFK.
I also see no evidence that the bullet traveled through anything (even branches which will deflect shots at range) prior to impact. Possibly the ammo was degraded as it was stored too long? Did someone actually validate that it was a .30-06 round that was recovered?
There is another mystery: no ballistic report.
Why the secrecy on a ballistic report? This evidence will not change over time, so holding on until a trial doesn't make a difference.
If the bullet doesn't match the rifle, the kid gets off!
Not with a court appointed defense attorney.
So dumbed down
She may have made her way up the ladder between pillow chats
Cheapo
Real woman works harder honestly
You da 'h. Go collect your "J" payoff
— BLOCKED —
Your hateful post just berates yourself my friend, not her.
She doesn't 'ask questions' – she makes bizarre, baseless accusations, and creates wild conspiracy theories to satiate her liberal audience.
Who else is still talking about the inconsistencies of the official Charlie Kirk assassination?…
Exactly, she needs to start bringing some evidence, but at least she is asking the questions of the lie they want us to believe.
Shes not preposing theories, shes asking about discrepancies… pay attention.
This is how it works. The mob of whatever is sent out with their talking points. Candace is crazy, this and that. To sway opinion. Go after her finances, to break her. They sent Erika Kirk out to Stop! Piers Morgan. Now the psycho's to hit on her. She's been called this and that, that and this. Her marriage to George Farmer questioned by Fuentes. Her kids, pregnancy. The lies and lies. But searching for the truth to Charlie Kirk's assassination, oh no. We can't go there. And neither should anyone else.
Okay mossad stooge
Gee! My comment was removed?
It always seems that way to the uninformed. Inform yourself and then you’ll understand her questions.
And the Haaavaad & Yaaaale PHD is guilty of making accusations "but, oddly enough, does not provide any proof – no factual data – that what Owen’s believes is incorrect."
exactly.
They are not "simps of power," they are bought by Operation Mockingbird. This is why they all sound and act the same. They get the memo in the morning.
Amen!!
I don't buy in to her current theory. However, it is ridiculous for people to act upset about it. They really don't like her because of her political stances, and they are too afraid and dishonest to say so.
Several of her theories sound kinda crazy, but like Alex Jones, she has been proven mostly correct. Regardless, in a free society you should be able to ask any question you want or you’re not in a free society. They are so Afraid of Jones that they had to financially break him, just like they have tried with Trump. Is Candace next on their hit list, or will they just Charlie Kirk her?
“Regardless, in a free society you should be able to ask any question you want”
Bingo
“They are so Afraid of Jones that they had to financially break him, just like they have tried with Trump.”
I think this is a different (((group))) behind this one.
Questions like what? Whether the Earth is flat? At best Csndace is a clueless mouth breathing idiot.
Low IQ for sure, really I just think shes dumb.
Your just described yourself. But hey, I'm a mouth breather too. Time for a nasoplasty.
Your limited vision is your issue, not hers my friend.
Guilty of calling out the government's lies
Nor does candy provide any evidence on why or how SHE is correct. ‘oddly enough, does not provide any proof – no factual data’. Who are we talking about? The Dr. or candy??
The hysterical and rabid attacks on Candace confirm we live in a time when curiosity is a crime.
Nonsense; she is not merely being curious.
She is pushing conspiracies for which she admits she has no proof, such as that leaders of TPUSA are complicit — she initially claimed they were complicit in the murder, but walked it back to merely complicit in a coverup.
So basucally, Ablechild is glad Owens is off her meds.
Candice is the only one seeking answers to a complete BS narrative. i.e. furry friend shot a broken down 30-06 hit the target no sighting in and Charlie's steel vertebrae deflected that round… anyone that shoots knows what utter BS this is. The narrative is totally bogus and part of a massive over up. Those that buy the BS need to put their masks back on and get another booster.
Let me guess. Antisemite much?
You say that like it's a crime.
It is in the Bible. Pretty severe punishment.
They'll just hit you with satanic unblical replacement theory and everything else they can twist out of context and proper understanding to ATTEMPT to justify their hatred and blaming of all Israel and all Js.
No unlike the left, oddly enough…
We don’t live in a theocracy.
Oh, we do, whether you like it or not.
Well then come at me, Shlomo.
A) I’ll be lucky to be cleaning stalls in the coming kingdom.
B) I’m not Jewish.
Then you have Stocholm Syndrome.
Your the one with the same narrative as Jihadists.
One desert rat is like another.
Not really.
“Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated”.
Have a blessed day, Candace.
yes…. you win the idiot of the year award. don’t criticize the 51st state or you’re an ‘antisemite.’ You are a complete brainwashed moron. go put on your mask and get another covid booster!
We can just as easily turn that around on a lot of you guys. This notion that nothing that can happen in the entire universe without being caused by the Js is a spiritual and mental sickness.
Thanks for admitting it. Enjoy burning in Hell.
While I would never wish that on anyone, as I've said for years – not Hitler, Bin Laden, Obama, or my worst enemy, many here on firmly on the broad road that leads to destruction. It's really sad to watch.
For three months their position was a standard 30-06 round pierced CK's neck, hit his cervical vertebrae fractured a few bones and lodged in his neck…now they're saying it's a frangible round. What an absolute CLOWN SHOW.
A nobody writing for an audience of basically zero.
Owens will be exposed positively or negatively in the near future regarding her statements. Let her stand on her own.
So another dirty libtard attorney wrote this.
Here is the AI definition of a conspiracy theory, it becomes truth when verifiable evidence—such as government documents, investigative journalism, or whistleblower testimony—proves it beyond a reasonable doubt. These theories shift from conjecture to fact when specific actors, motives, and actions are confirmed, often transforming into documented history or scandal. It must start with questioning and it will commence with fact but questioning a conspiracy before it becomes fact is what is at issue here in our country right now!!! I just wrote a book about this called The "Activist" See No Truth Hear No Truth Speak No Truth. You are the epitome of the content in my book if you are degrading, standing in judgment of another who thinks differently than you and demeaning the questioner who formed a perception, questioned everything and is seeking truth. This is why our society has been so chaotic because we continue to run from the truth, resist it at every turn and then name call and demean anyone who steps out of the herd to question everything. We will continue to fall in our humanity if we do not seek truth in everything and we must stop standing in judgment of those who question it.
……………government documents, investigative journalism, or whistleblower testimony—proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Give me three cows and a 30.06 and I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Charly Kirk was not shot in the neck with a 30.06
My bullet will go through all three cows.
Great response!
I don't understand the logic of an argument that says it is good to be a questioner but bad to question those who are questioners ("we must stop standing in judgment of those who question it").
Questioning it is not the issue demeaning and name calling when we don’t agree with someone is the issue here.
But you said "we must top standing in judgment of those who question it," which is broader than name-calling or demeaning.
If I reach the conclusion that she is a kook, for example, I am certainly standing in judgment but I don't think that I am contributing to the "fall of humanity."
In fact, even if I reach the conclusion that beyond being a kook, she is contributing to the fall of humanity because of the public nature of her "questions," my personal judgment is still not destructive to humanity.
It is, rather, the healthy skepticism that you seem to admire when people such as Candace do it.
Moreover, your judgment that I am contributing to the fall of humanity because I have judged her to be a kook means that you are guilty of standing in judgment of me simply because I "think differently," which is the flaw that you are bemoaning in others.
Hi Joseph I really appreciate you response because I think compassionate dialogue is the best result of any debate. Anytime anyone stands in judgment of another and responds with demeaning or degrading name calling, it is contributing to the lowering of the frequencies of the planet. That is part of the fall I am describing. I do not agree with Candace Owens but I do agree that she has a right to question and seek answers as long as she is not degrading or demeaning another. I believe there is a lot more to this and it is not all based on healthy skepticism or other critical thinking skills. I am looking at this from a more spiritual perspective of one of us has to be wrong so the other can be right.
I think we probably agree about a lot in theory.
But to the extent that the argument morphs into some version of "we can't be critical of Candace being critical of others because she is just seeking the truth," I disagree.
I agree with you that we would probably wind up at the same intersection after much debate. I believe you and I have every right to be critical of Candace or anyone seeking answers to questions. The difference I believe that we are taking different roads to is that being critical is not justification for name calling, degrading, threatening or judging another. I am as imperfect a human being as any other but I do wake up each morning with the mindset that today I would like to be a better version of myself than I was yesterday. Have a beautiful day and thank you for the amazing conversation which is my whole point about my response. Let’s be compassionate and still be critical thinkers without having to condemn others for not sharing our perspective. Imagine the world we would have if everyone had a conversation as we just did. I want to live in that world! Blessings to you, Audrey
Current affairs editor needs some serious help if he thinks Charlie was shot wit a 30.06.
why discuss an article from a sociology graduate from Harvard? The degree alone tells you what their slant is. While I think Candace has jumped the shark, she does make many salient points. Brigitte Macron is indeed a man and we do have a problem with juice control of our politicians and institutions.
She should have stuck with the macron thing.
I guess owens can produce her evidence in a french court.
Maybe she shouldn’t talk about conspiracy theories until she has actual proof.
I think she should keep talking because it is always hilarious to watch psychiatrists, who know nothing about guns, come out of the woodwork and tell you that they believe Charlie was shot with a 30.06
She wouldn’t need to talk about ‘conspiracy theories’ if the authorities provided the proof. Maybe, eventually, they will. Until then, they are fueling these theories …… these QUESTIONS.
The PROOF will be shown in a court of law, you nit wit. The OBJECTIVE is a FAIR TRIAL and CONVICTION of the assasin. NOT airing the evidence for conspiracists.
Now the problem is not just Candace it’s everyone who listens to her. Psyop.
Shes dividing the right. For clicks. TPUSA was a huge force in 24 and shes telling people not to support tpusa.
Asking questions is not a conspiracy. The UK has fallen to this type of criticism to the point where any criticism of the established narrative is treated as a hate crime. Let’s not fall into that trap. ‘There’s no such thing as a bad question.’
Are you sh*tting me?
/s/
Would I sh **t you?
She isnt just asking questions. If only.
When asking questions is the problem… and not the lack of answers … something is wrong!
Candace admits that she does not have answers.
She's not looking.
That's why she's asking questions… Why is TPUSA afraid to answer those questions …? If someone close to you (also in close proximity to you) were shot would you turn? … run? … duck? … or casually walk away on you phone ……
She is a grifter.
And the organization selling $70 million in t-shirts at a funeral …. are what …?
You’re ridiculous
Okay.
Question: How could you be so stupid as to believes this? (just a question. totally fair game.)
Too stupid to answer the original question…? Idiot …
Good little lemming …
it's the jews owens…she is trash and has used a man's death to further herself…
This "editor" is obviously a spokesman for our closest ally.
I didnt read it all. Owens is a disgusting grifter. I hope her 15 mins are up.
Candace is 1000% Normal and Correct. What this shows is how corrupt everything is… many of these podcasters who we thought were grass roots real activist for the Patriots of this country (Crowder, Tim Poole, Nick Fuentes, etc…) are all FEDS and their reaction to someone like Candace ASKING QUESTIONS about an assassination narrative that makes no sense at all to anyone with a brain and a little bit of common sense. PAY ATTENTION to who opposes Candace (that is your enemy)
Normal and correct? lmfao!
"PAY ATTENTION to who opposes Candace (that is your enemy)"
Bingo
Candace Owens' decayed liberal brain does not represent the 'American brain'. Owens hates America – she's a liberal lunatic
What happened to her and Carlson? Both have turned into self serving wack a moles.
Or maybe you are brainwashed and don't even realize it?
Thinking for ourselves is critical. Blindly continuing to believe the same government and media that have repeatedly lied to us is insane.
Lol whose brainwashed sally? Who blindly follows all the fake conspiracy theories again? They have nice pharma help for the delusional koolaid drinkers. Get ya some asap sally. Or is it karen?
My name is Jeff. :)
Make sure to get your booster. lol.
Hi karen, make sure to revel in those delusions but it might help to grab some of the pharma that the luny left takes for delusion.
He sounds like a "dedicated student"?
No, he sounds like a DEI motard.
Thank you Joe for the balanced article.
When Current Affairs cranks out the hit pieces you know the apple cart has been dumped.
The DeepState/Zionist propaganda is getting really thick. It looks like this time they were caught red-handed.
You can tell that Candice is on to something by how hard they are trying to shut her up.
They can't lie to us like they used to, and they are panicking.
I am loving every minute of this.
The text below are from Charlie Kirk to a group chat 48 hours before his murder. THEY HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED AS AUTHENTIC BY TPUSA.
–
Charlie Kirk: Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker
I'm thinking of inviting Candace
Charlie Kirk: Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this.
Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.
So?
Lol, you Israelis are a funny lot.
It's easier to believe Candace than most of the sad, old puke that is talk radio or podcasting out there because they are fearful to say shocking, brave things.
Sadly society at large is increasingly dishonest, captured, mentally ill, addicted and contained.
The bad guys are winning everywhere. Period.
Also don't overlook Netayahu's massive influencer campaign that is funded with serious money… The bright effective investigators will have nothing to do with the $7K/mo and instead the backbenchers are the typical captured podcasters… Listen to Tim Pool, Laura Loomer, Steven Crowder, Nick Fuentes, to name a few obvious ones.
They used to laugh about all the lies they told us. That seems to be changing.
It's always the pioneers that take the arrows.
And the cavalry that has to come in and save them.
Asking questions and not accepting the government's narrative is a bad thing and government educated retards know this.
It's fine to ask questions of the government.
And it is also fine to be skeptical of internet sleuths who admit they have no answers.
THEY WON'T debate Candice on the facts because she raises many valid points.
You can't debate a crime.
That's absurd.
ADHD is vaccine injury – only appearing normal because the unvaxxed control group has been so small for decades. Thankfully though, with the help of RFK,Jr. this is rapidly changing!
Candace is looking into multiple rabbit holes that don't bode well for international nation state actors, include US. Her investigation is global, across all people, including govt and military whistleblowers. Like any investigator, she doesn't lay it all out at once but strategically to draw out opposition – often points to both bots and bad actors. The hit on her has proven very credible the Macron's used intel as possible assassins. Crowdsourcing investigations brings professionals together and when collaborating discloses clues, sus areas to explore and even hard evidence. She brings receipts. Another prolific investigator is Baron Coleman (a defense attorney) has brought credible theory Charlies may have been electrocuted… I find it odd, only citizen investigators are looking for answers to the many colflicting "facts" and filling the voids of no info. Why is FBI not interested in even look into these credible leads? Air traffic controllers have come forward sheding valuable light on the French airplanes, inactive military familiar w/spec operation missions confirm and validate info. Of course they don't want her looking…
Facts? She never has a provable fact, All she has is speculation which she hopes will fire up the gullable. She has lost her cute little mind.
She's another cabal flunky pretending to be conservative. Where is her proof of what she's stated?? Her father-in-law is a British lord who worked for the Rothschilds.
Candace could do a lot more good if she didn't get distracted with crazy wild goose chases, like whether the French 1st lady is really a man.
Even if Candace could prove Macron's wife began as a male, how will that move our society ahead? What impact could it possibly have on issues that matter to most people, like the economy, illegal immigration, vote integrity, etc.?
Candice Owens seems intent on distracting the public with dark imaginings, while she could do a lot more good if she tried.
Okay, but you're okay with her doing that right? I mean we all get to make our own choices in life right?
"Current Affairs" is a CFR production.
If you like the ravings of author Nathan Robinson then thank a teacher for spreading their vile propaganda to their students.
Robinson speaks as though he has personal experience with "Decay of the Brain"!
She doesn't know know, but she knows! Ya know!?
Nobody cared about Candace until she started noticing that Israel has so much influence over the US government.
100% – Jimmy Dore also sheds light on the mess.
Jimmy Dore is nuts too!
Anyone that thinks different to me is a n@zzzzi… you sound like a pedotrans lefty
What is this angst with Israel? I guess you could ally with say, now whats a good peaceful nation overthere…… let me think. Nope cant think of one.
Not allying (read, supporting) anyone at all is a very American idea indeed, unless you don't like George Washington.
For the most part, this is what China does. They are not entangled with anyone really. The alliance with Russia is purely economic. They will do business with anyone and it's all about that – the business. They do business with India and they've had many border skirmishes over the year. China puts China first whether we like their style of government or not.
Israel? Hahaha. Has anybody checked out the islamization of the world lately? Using Israel to deflect what is really happening all over the world.
Agreed.
It's sadly as God's word told us it would be in these the last of the last days. Much of the world will turn against Israel and that's what we are seeing including here in our own country.
The nation state of Israel is NOT the Israel of the Bible. But nice try.
Even in the OT, it wasn't a panacea. Humanity never is, never will be …
“The nation state of Israel is NOT the Israel of the Bible. But nice try.”
Nice try huh? I can only bring you the truth of God’s word. What you do with it is up to you and you will answer to God for that. Sounds like you need to get into a real Bible believing, Bible teaching church.
Replacement theology is unbiblical. Read Romans 11. When God made an everlasting covenant with Israel, he meant it. You are on the wrong side. You can twist and manipulate scripture all you want. You can side with Satan and Muslims, both of whom despise Israel and all the Js. In the end, I would not want to be in your shoes.
'Replacement theology' is a recent man made term used to denigrate the use of scripture to prove that there are indeed 'those who claim to be Jews, but are not'. Abraham was not a Jew. Quit replacing one with the other. Muslims are not even a bloodline so you are off there also. The Church of Israel is real just as separately the Church of the Body of Christ is real. Don't mix the two, no matter how much these 'prophecy' clowns try to.
Absolute demonic lies. Get thee behind me Satan! Blocked
We are not against Israel or the people of Israel. We are against their politicians and their control over our politicians.
“We are not against Israel or the people of Israel. We are against their politicians and their control over our politicians.”
-See the problem is most people don’t make that distinction and separation in their comments. In fact if you talk to most people long enough they will eventually tell you they basically don’t like any of the Israeli government at all, and that they’re not fond of Js in general. There are exceptions, but this is the overwhelming majority that I come across.
not true
Absolutely true deceived man
Another example of what I’m talking about. Sybil Luddington, one of countless Israel/J haters/deniers posts:
“The nation state of Israel is NOT the Israel of the Bible.”
Yes you saw it, yes you agree with it, because you put a like on it.
This and other forms of denying the nation of Israel’s right to exist are posted over and over.
Quit calling people Jew haters just because they oppose much of what the godless secular government of 'Israel;' does. I love Israel of the Bible but oppose a single tax dollar going to that racist government.
You are J haters because of the nonstop bashing and encouraging others to bash all of Israel, Js, and deny them as a country. STOP LYING. YOU AREN’T FOOLING ANYWHERE NEAR AS MANY AS YOU THINK, and you CERTAINLY aren’t fooling GID, who will judge you! REPENT!
All the J government is racist? You sound like a leftist even more with such outrageous stupidity and hatred.
United Nations 'Israel' of 1948 is a ruse, a counterfeit, and NOT the Israel of the Bible. THAT is the scam of scams, designed to fool the sincerest of Christians, and the very elect of God.
Nope. Have fun explaining away Romans 11, unbiblical replacement theory, and all the J and Israel hatred when you kneel before the Lord one day. Good luck!
You should spend some quality time at the Got Questions website, because CLEARLY you do not know God’s word, and likely don’t attend a Bible believing, Bible-teaching church.
Amen
ALL nations have DS influences …
The French noticed
Including Charlie started agreeing with her. And Tucker Carlson is now also getting flack left right and center for saying now the same thing. If you are over the target, expect some return fire.
I hate that argument……….. getting "flack" is certainly applicable in some respects, but it is not universal…………………… Expecting flack when you are "over the target" should be expected, but just because someone is recieving flack does NOT mean they are on the right bombing run…….. The media lies about Trump ALL THE TIME, but because they are not over a real target, does that mean that Trump shouldn't shoot back?
Nobody cared about Candace until she used the murder of Charlie Kirk to make millions accusing everyone from Erika to Egypt to France and Isreal for the murder of Charlie. Everyone except the guy who confessed to doing it.
Thanks for letting us know you're ignorant.
she is poorer for doing so.
How much did Turning Point USA rake in over Charlie Kirk? Owens never accused Erika or Egypt or France or Isreal of anything. She relayed and shared information she received with her audience. Making a timeline of things that occurred and placing people where they were in that timeline is not accusing anyone of murder. Gathering information is not a crime. Sharing information is not a crime. Depending on what it is. Police, journalist, investigators, doctors, lawyers, heck, even people like you and me use timelines for a host of things. Do you honestly think that Owens doesn't have info on Tyler Robinson or his partner? They are in her timeline. Candace was number 3 on the top podcast list before Charlie Kirk was assassinated with her document series on Brigitte Macron. She was very much watched and listened to. And her audience loves and cares about her very much. Heck, even I tune in every now and then to her podcast show.
Oh look a cult member is defending Candace, how unusual. Run along. She is a threat to democracy now. She and Tucker are splitting the GOP. We lose in the midterms, it is their fault alone.
DEMOCRACY is the CULT. Mob rule. Look at all the little mobs given their marching orders to attack Candace Owens. One by one sitting on the bench waiting to be called on to the field. From so called friends, fellow podcasters, a psychiatrist to judge her sanity, Fuentes questioning her marriage, to the Stop person Erika Kirk, bots, trolls, Shapiro, Walsh, Morgan, Pool, etc. They attack Owens but for some odd reason they won't prove her wrong in anything she has disclosed thus far. Chew on that!!
She was number 3 on the podcast list before the charlie kirk assassination. docu series on brigitte macron.
Candace is the only one that I know of really investigating Charlie's murder. Others are only either quoting her or do minor vlogs on bullet trajectories, etc.
She just wants to nail it to the Jews, for her husband and their priests. Watch she will never stop until she can prove it was Jews which means she will never stop
BS – she's following the trail that no one else has the guts to investigate… go back to sleep
Stop with this bullshit that critics of Owens have to remain silent while she's free to drop defamation after defamation on all of her many, many enemies on the right.
again, go get a covid booster, put your mask on like a good sheep. moron.
So you prefer critics to die? sounds sort of Adolfish to me.
whoever said critics need to remain silent? you’re a moron.
"go back to sleep", your words not mine.
I prefer to not remain silent, dipshit.
As long as she can lead it back to Isrhhhhhael.
you sound like a zionist…
I am an American born again Bible believing Christian and a Zionist to boot!
Amen Brother.
They would be as well, If not for drinking the Kool-Aid of unbiblical false replacement theology.
Your hatred of God is noted.
And What a coincidence, it is the same hatred shared by none other than Satan himself first and foremost, but also all of his favorite death cult members in Islam.
She claimed a Soccer goalie wearing a green shirt was a potential suspect, when he responded, she changed it to the people in maroon shirts, then into the Egyptian jets, then onto the backers of TPUSA, then onto Erika Kirk herself.
That's not investigating, that's witch hunting and true crime fantasies. She has corrupted the minds of her majority Progressive audience (Yes, a large amount of her new audience are leftist women, look it up). She is a manipulative narcissist.
I beg to differ on witch hunt. Most leads will end up in a dead end. And she is relying on her viewers to supply her with leads and evidence so she is often throwing a stone in a bush to see what comes out of it if any.
FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) — The FBI is actively involved in the investigation into the killing of Charlie Kirk, providing forensic analysis and broader investigative support. FBI Director Kash Patel has publicly discussed the bureau’s role, including examining digital evidence like Discord chats associated with the suspect.
Utah County Sheriff’s Office & Local Police — Local law enforcement in Utah County (where Utah Valley University and Provo are located) initially conducted the manhunt and arrest of the suspect, and continue to work with state and federal agencies on the investigation.
Utah County Attorney’s Office (Prosecution) — Prosecutors led by Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray have formally charged the suspect, Tyler Robinson, with aggravated murder and additional counts and are preparing the criminal case.
Goodness, this is a good Factcheck ChatGPT type answer.
precisely a chatGPT answer….im afraid that they dont keep ole Pablo in the loop these days….so, ChatGP for me!
you're glowing
Ummm – congrats on buying into the fake narrative. You're officially brain dead. go back to sleep.
The FBI was probably behind the whole episode.
They need to "investigate" themselves.
If not this alphabet agency, then another.
why be so willfully ignorant?
the FBI didnt carry out a hit on Charlie Kirk.
what leads you to believe this? pls dont tell me
you heard it from Alex Jones! lol…
Naw! Everyone knows it was Mossad. SARC!
Or not…
So part of that "investigation" includes victim shaming Charlie's wife? No.
Erika is the dry-eye dabbing grifter that forgave the shooter and now is worried about 'tainting' the jury pool. She's fake AF!
and Candace is a click HO to the tune of 10 million a year.
sounds like you’re jealous… again, go get a covid booster, put your mask on like a good sheep. moron.
That's not an argument.
They got nothing
Charlie Kirk's refusal to try the Brown Sugar…apparently.
Erika apparently stepped in and dealt a death blow to Candace's Kirk dreams.
Please get back to us when your spouse is horrifically executed and tell us exactly how you process and deal with every bit of it on a minute by minute and day-by-day basis.
A PhD in sociology from Harvard isn't worth spit but regarding Candice, something definitely changed in the last year or so. Maybe she is doing this to attract ever more attention or maybe something broke inside. Whatever happened, I hope she gets some help.
People used to scoff at Alex Jones. Until time passed and many crazy things he said turned out to be accurate.
you mean like the "fake" Sandy Hook school shooting? lol
I never did. But Candice is off the rails.
no – she's going after the trail that everyone else dismisses. The narrative is pure BS. be a good sheep & go back to sleep
Yes
I thought he went broke after the defamation suit?
100% correct, and look at the antisemites rant!
It's her husband you donuts!! She changed when she got married and converted to the strange sect of Jew hating Catholicism. It's as plain as day.
True as that may be, it's on her. She's strong and can make her own choices.
Not in that sect she is in.
Show me the Jews and I will show you the crime she cries!!
She definitely has the mind virus, and definitely needs the Lord.
your last reply to me proves that you do not walk with God
^see above^
Huh?
She And sadly quite a number of our fellow commenters
It’s a disease and they can’t see it.
Because the scales are still over their eyes. These things are spiritually discerned. Anyone that is rooted in God’s word can see this as plain as day. Their pride gets in the way as well. It is human nature to not want to come to the realization and acknowledgment that you have been deceived and misled on something.
Okay, but at the very least, this should concern conservatives about lending credence to her. Genuine nutty leftist can now come out against ther, and look sane in comparison.
She has a record of sanity which is confusing, but at this point, everyone should be able to see the changes and call her out. But we're stumbling, and paying the price.
"Robinson wastes about 3,000 words whining to readers about what he thinks is crazy about Owens but, oddly enough, does not provide any proof – no factual data – that what Owen’s believes is incorrect."
WOW…I have been saying the EXACT SAME THING to GWP commenters who do NOT know what the he ll they are talking about. They give NO EVIDENCE Candace is wrong…NONE.
she's not wrong
Dr Robinson, PhD from Harvard and a JD from Yale is a Sociologist Attorney.
Sociology is the NUMBER 1 WORST "science" followed closely by Psychology.
Psychiatry at least can use Chemistry.
Jasmine Crockett
So is narcissism a legit psychological condition or not?
She is a good example of that decay.
For those that claime Candace is a conservative,when was the last time she talked about Islam,illegals,ANTIFA or even criticized a democrat? Candace like Tucker Carlson is anti Trump and wants to take him down. Both Tucker and Candace now have Islamic sympathies to put it mildly. If you choose to follow her remember you were warned.
Tucker just bought a house in Qatar. That's his idea of America first I guess.
Don't like Owens, the least of her problems is her narcissism but saying that, if someone in the Psychology field publicly gives analysis of anyone in public and without consent is wrong and those persons should be struck off.
America is caught in a crisis of discernment…
It's REAL bad.
Candice is guilty of more than one thing. She is a hateful ant-semite who continually fabricates ideas with zero proof of anything she posts. I used to like her but she has turned into something I can't understand. Her evdence that Israel is killing children comes from the terrorists who slaughtered over 1,000 kids at a rock concert. That's the most level headed thing I can think of. NOT!
So much she has said and spread is sick and demonic, yet her cult followers think it's all okay, because after all, "at least she's asking questions!'
Yes, she is asking questions, but by what reason? It is hard to ignore her hatred for Jews as every thing she "questions" is based upon that? There are many topics that need questioning without trying to destroy conservatives.
The decay is obvious. Go to any restaurant look at a family sitting togeter. They are all on their PHONES!
But, but Hannity's Great One- Levine the hack, says every conservative who disagrees with anything Israel does is a traitor to the US? We need to ignore George Washington's farewell address and bow to our new master.
'Robinson has a PhD in sociology from Harvard and a JD from Yale Law School'
This meant something long ago, now it's just bachelors with a huge life following debt.
Candis must be hovering over the target. Her critics are squirming.
From my perspective, Candace is all about….. Candace.
You can feel different, but trashing a widowed young mother publicly …. isn't acceptable.
I wonder what she will do when the trial is over and Tyler is sent away for life? Will she stop then?
Im still hoping the assasin gets the squad.
Who wrote the article? It says By Joe Hoft then it says it's from "Ablechild" reprinted w permission. ??? Why?? I just want to share it and not be an imbecile who doesn't know what I'm sharing.
Not sure what the deal is between Erica Kirk and Candace Owens but Erica Kirk is not the bad guy and there are plenty of other Democrats that Candace needs to start going after……..
Only thing Erika has to do to gain back a lot of lost love, is let the rest of us know that she gives a good got dang, about finding out who really killed her husband more then she does about a company.
"They" just want to silence us and any questions we might have, whether or not they're legitimate.
The 1st Amendment doesn't care about legitimacy, it cares about restraining those in power, PERIOD!
I stand with Candace.
Candice is only as credible as her claim that the First Lady of France is a man, period.
Emanuel is a Man, though it's a bit rude to call him the First Lady of France. Also, his Husband Bridgette is a dude too of course.
This stupid low IQ black woman just needs to just go away
Why all the blitz if cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?
Mental illness defination is depraved adults indoctrinating minds and altering and mutilating the genitalia of minors.
Candice went over the deep end some time ago. Now she is completely wacko.
More proof that Candace was over the target. There are way too many discrepancies around the Kirk assassination to ignore, and those of us who still retain some critical thinking skills know this.
Current who ? Candice rocks. Stick you your guns, Candice. You're over the target !
Candice Owens is a flake,period.
Dude has a PhD, but accepts that a 30-06 hit Kirk, and that bomb sniffing dogs missed a recently fired rifle (because the FBI planted the rifle). Worthless PhD if they will award it to someone so stupid.