Colorado Unquestionably Usurped Federal Law to Incarcerate Tina Peters
Guest Post by Martel Maxim
It was a “hit job” on Tina Peters; they never had a case against her
If the SUPREMACY CLAUSE, the FBI’s own Website, and 52 USC 20701 mean anything at all, Tina Peters would have never been “kidnapped” into prison under false Colorado pretenses. Those false pretenses were 7 felonies and 3 misdemeanors fraudulently manufactured against her. To make matters worse, Tina was “lawfared” out of presenting a meaningful defense at her trial, including the denial of 41 motions that would have clearly shown her innocence to a jury.
In short, it was actually reminiscent of a Soviet Show Trial to silence her and all election clerks nationwide from ever meaningfully questioning the computerized election ecosystem again. This was especially obvious due to the 2024 Presidential election occurring just a month from her sentencing on October 3rd, 2024.
In other words, since 2021, the orchestrated persecution, prosecution, and incarceration of Tina Peters was for only one purpose, and that was to silence her First Amendment voice. During sentencing, “Judge” Barrett’s comments made that obvious: “This is what makes Ms. Peters such a danger for our community: her position provided her a pulpit on which to preach,” he said. “Prison is for those folks who are a danger to all of us, whether it be by the pen or the sword or the word of mouth.”
In accordance with the Supremacy Clause, the FBI’s Website and 52 USC 20701, as described above and now detailed below, Tina should have been removed from Colorado’s jurisdiction and placed in the federal witness protection program as a star witness regarding the theft of 2020.
Instead, the DOJ’s inaction continues to place Tina’s life in jeopardy every day, not to mention the harshness of her being forced to live among violent criminals. Those criminals include murderers (for women, Colorado doesn’t separate inmates depending on the severity of their crimes). Even if Tina was guilty of anything, it would be of a white-collar nature and would be separated from violent criminals if in a man’s prison.
FACT #1
As described above, according to the FBI’s Website (the FBI is under the control of the DOJ), https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/public-corruption/election-crimes, the first bullet point states: “Election crimes become federal cases when the ballot includes one or more federal candidates”. (2020 included many House and Senate races, including POTUS). Here is a screenshot of that website:
FACT #2
Colorado SOS Jena Griswold willfully, knowingly, and purposely deleted approximately 29,000 election records from the 2020 Presidential and 2021 Municipal elections in defiance of 52 USC 20701.
(The following is pasted from an AI summary)
Approximately 29,000 election records were deleted during the “Trusted Build” software update on the Mesa County voting system in May 2021. This figure is consistently cited across multiple reports and statements by Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters and forensic analysts.
- The deletion included critical log files, database records, and adjudication files required under federal and state law to be preserved for 22 months.
- A forensic analysis found that the “Trusted Build” update by Dominion Voting Systems erased all data on the EMS server, including records from the 2020 general election and the 2021 Grand Junction municipal election.
FACT #3
In addition to the deleted 29,000 election records reflecting the “Swiss Cheese Security” of our computerized election ecosystem, it was also discovered that a secondary (SECRET) reportable database is generated to ‘slice and dice’ the actual votes received to arrive at the vote count necessary for the selected candidate to win, and those are the votes that get reported.
All this and more is found at https://tinapeters.us/. Specifically noted in the Forensic Reports.
(Here’s an AI summary):
Yes, former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters claimed to discover a secret secondary election database through her forensic analysis of election server hard drives.
- The Claim: Peters released reports alleging that a “second set of books” was created within the Election Management Server (EMS) to report false vote totals to the media, particularly during the 2020 and 2021 elections.
- The Context: These findings were based on before-and-after images of hard drives taken during a 2021 software update known as the “Trusted Build,” which Peters authorized an unauthorized associate to copy.
Additionally, the Forensic Reports provided by former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters identified 36 wireless devices on the county’s former election server system. These reports claimed the devices represented a security vulnerability that could allow unauthorized remote access to the Election Management System. These findings are just the tip of the iceberg.
Yet, despite all this evidence captured from the 2020 election that included MANY FEDERAL CANDIDATES, INCLUDING POTUS, Tina Peters remains in a Colorado State Prison as the ‘Sacrificial Lamb’ for ALL the complicit criminals that put her there.
When Ivan Raiklin recently posted the following regarding Federal vs. State Jurisdiction of Tina, the US Marshal Service responded with the following, identifying the need for direction from Acting AG Todd Blanche:
Here’s the Online Post and Corresponding Video
An AI summary describing the line of authority states the following: The chain of command from the President to the U.S. Marshals runs through the Attorney General of the Department of Justice (DOJ). The U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) is a component of the DOJ, and the 94 U.S. Marshals are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, operating under the authority of the Attorney General.
Presidential authority is exercised over the USMS via the executive branch structure.
Given that President Trump has already pardoned Tina Peters, his concurrence that she was performing federal duties involving Federal candidates is implicit in his pardon. One doesn’t need to look any further than the FBI’s own website, noted in FACT #1, and reinforced in FACTS 2 & 3 stated above, to know that the DOJ has the immediate authority to direct the US Marshals to extricate Tina Peters from the Colorado Prison where she resides.
But Tina's charges were only tangentially related to the election. Her charges were related to violating security protocols and identity theft, which is clearly in the state's purview. So I'm not seeing how any of this applies to her case.
Also I appreciate you letting us know this article was written by AI. I wish you wouldn't do it, but I do appreciate you at least letting us know.
Supported by AI, the reports mentioned are accurate. She made a copy of the database before the "upgrade" then transferred it to LE which had legitimate forensic team analyze the data. Her crime was illustrating how corrupt Griswold and the Liberal administration were.
She stole a coworker's security credentials and then gave them to one of Mike Lindell's guys so that he could access restricted files.
She has admitted to this from the start but she had claimed (until now) that it was the only way to stop election fraud.
And…?
We The People can hope that once TINA is released — and given some time to decompress — in conjunction with the DJT Admin, the DOJ, RNC, etc., that regarding the MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD in CO — and elsewhere — TINA will be singing like a canary.
May GOD bless Tina and her Family.
MAGA & MAHA!