News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Support Joe's Work

Subscribe

Help support Joe's work

Choose an amount

BREAKING UPDATE: Colorado Court Affirms Tina Peters’ Convictions But Reverses Sentencing Back to Trial Court, Ignores Trump’s Pardon and Supremacy Clause of Constitution

Another sad day for justice in America.  

A division of the Colorado Court of Appeals affirms Tina Peters’ convictions but reverses her sentencing back to the trial court.

The overall point today is that the courts in Colorado have systematically covered up Tina Peters’ evidence that the election numbers in her county changed after an action was taken on her county’s computers labeled a “trusted build” which was mandated by the state. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Colorado courts ignored that the records had been changed, covered it up, and went after Tina Peters for sharing what she found.  She was sentenced to 9 years in prison and is still in prison today.

In addition, today the court ruled that President Trump (or any President) does not have the power to pardon Tina Peters for her state crimes, and that the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution does not apply to Tina Peters.

The ruling looks like it was written by Norm Eisen – Obama’s Ethics Czar. 

Sentenced for Felony but Convicted of Misdeamor

During a recent hearing in front of a Colorado court, we learned that, amongst all the wrongdoing by Colorado politicians and courts who targeted Tina Peters, the court sentenced Tina to a felony for a misdemeanor she was convicted of, which led to an additional year in prison.

ADVERTISEMENT

In today’s ruling, this wrongdoing has been returned to the trial court for resolution.

Colorado Ignores Presidential Pardon

In regard to President Trump’s pardon, the court claims that President Trump does not have the power to pardon Tina Peters of state crimes because of its interpretation of the US Constitution, while the court’s ruling reads like Bill Clinton arguing the meaning of what the definition of “is” is…

Had the Founders wanted to extend the presidential pardon power to state offenses, they could have used language identical or similar to “the several States” later in the sentence. But they did not. Instead, they used only “the United States,” which must mean something different than “the several States.”

Let’s hope the President and his team are quickly on this and readying an appeal of this ridiculous ruling today.

Here is one analysis of this matter shared previously:

President Trump Had Every Right to Pardon Tina Peters Because Biden’s Federal Agencies Were All Over the Tina Peters Case

ADVERTISEMENT

Supremacy Clause and Federal Actions related to Tina’s case

In regard to the Supremacy Clause, Tina Peters has argued that she was doing her job as Mesa County Clerk overseeing state and federal elections when she made an effort to ensure that her county’s records had not changed after the “trusted build” took place.

There is ample evidence that the federal government under Biden was involved in the Tina Peters case, which supports the argument that, because the federal government led the effort, directed it, or was a large part of the effort to indict and imprison Tina Peters, went against the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution. 

The Biden Regime’s involvement in the Tina Peters Case

The FBI issued a statement almost immediately after Peters came forward, stating that they would investigate her for potential violations of federal laws. The Biden regime never formally prosecuted Tina, but it appears that Biden’s Department of Justice was working closely with local Colorado officials who sought to put Peters in jail. (https://coloradosun.com/2021/08/17/tina-peters-replaced/)

The Mesa County District Attorney, Dan Rubinstein, included Matthew Kirsh, the United States Attorney for Colorado, in a May 17, 2022, email to multiple District Attorneys across Colorado. The email is titled “Rule 3.8 Meeting” which appears to reference the rules of professional conduct for prosecutors. (https://www.justice.gov/usao-co/meet-us-attorney, https://www.cobar.org/Portals/COBAR/Repository/12.1.22/Rule%203.8%20-%20Special%20Responsibilities%20of%20a%20Prosecutor.pdf?ver=h4k_BG_0T1kn7Rdgo8sLiQ%3D%3D )

Email from Dan Rubinstein to DOJ attorney and Colorado District Attorneys, apparently brainstorming how to appear legitimate and ethical while prosecuting Tina Peters

The email suggests that Rubinstein was having some trouble reconciling the prosecution of Tina Peters with prosecutors’ rules of professional conduct and had to call in the cavalry to help him brainstorm ways to avoid being “accused of wrongdoing.”

Mesa County District Attorney Dan Rubinstein

First, Rubinstein appears to recognize that there is no precedent for the prosecution he wants to undertake, as he expresses a desire that this group of legal minds start writing opinions and issuing guidance documents in the vein of the Colorado Bar Association (CBA) and the Colorado District Attorneys’ Council (CDAC). Without a coherent legal pathway for prosecution, it appears Rubinstein encouraged this course of action to give prosecutors cover.

Second, Rubinstein notes that it is problematic that they have no formal appointments from a government body to lay the groundwork to prosecute Peters.

Third, Rubinstein informs the group of their need to anticipate defending themselves as to why they didn’t seek an opinion on Peter’s case from the Colorado Bar Association Ethics Commission. Rubinstein and his cronies appear to have succeeded in giving their efforts the veneer of legitimacy because three months after this email was sent, Peters was indicted by a grand jury. (https://www.coloradopolitics.com/courts/tina-peters-arraigned-on-10-felony-misdemeanor-charges-in-case-alleging-election-equipment-breach/article_7ad92362-14ff-11ed-8571-7fe4f678dc82.html)

Another glaring piece of evidence that the Tina Peters case was led by the federal government is that if this was ‘only a Colorado issue’, why were US Attorney General Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray participating in initial Mesa County discussions via Webex regarding the findings of Clerk Peters and her actions related to those findings?

We also know that the full force of the federal government was directly applied to those associated with Tina’s situation, in that the FBI raided Tina’s home.

In addition, Tina’s associate, Sherronna Bishop, ’s home also raided by the FBI.

Also, ‘My Pillow’ CEO Mike Lindell was also targeted by the FBI, and they confiscated his phone while he was traveling in Minnesota.  These were federal actions.  He was communicating with Tina Peters and offered her his support.

Peters was convicted of first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty, and identity theft.

The official statement behind Tina Peters’ indictment included mention of the federal government,

 The Mesa County District Attorney’s Office and the Colorado Attorney General’s Office assisted the FBI in the operation, which was described by Mesa County spokesperson Stephanie Reecy as “federally-authorized law enforcement actions into potential criminal activity by employees of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder’s Office and others associated with those employees.”  Read all about it HERE.

It’s easy to see that the federal government was involved in this case and that the federal actions noted above like the raids (that they conveniently ignore now), indicate that this was much more than a Colorado issue.  (See Tina Peters story and watch “Selection Code” at https://tinapeters.us/ (links from dropdown menu)).

The Colorado Court of Appeals rejects Tina Peters’s claim of Supremacy Clause immunity and holds that the doctrine does not apply to her (or protect her from state prosecution).

Here is what the court says, in its own words and analysis (from the opinion’s Section II.B, ¶¶ 53–64):

  • The Supremacy Clause (U.S. Const. art. VI, cl. 2) provides absolute immunity from state prosecution, but only to federal officers (and those acting as their agents or under direct federal court orders) for “reasonable and necessary actions in the discharge of their federal responsibilities.” (Citing In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890); Ohio v. Thomas, 173 U.S. 276 (1899); and modern federal cases.)

  • Peters does not claim to be a federal employee or federal agent. Instead, she argues the immunity extends more broadly to “any individual acting pursuant to a statutory duty imposed by federal law” (e.g., her claimed duty under federal election-record statutes like 52 U.S.C. § 20701 to preserve records for 22 months).

Rather than remove a potentially innocent person or a pardoned person from prison, Colorado keeps Tina Peters in prison while the courts grapple with her case.  Unreal…  This is not America!

Here is the court’s decision.

2026-0402_Opinionj CO Tina Peters by Joe Ho

 

529 thoughts on “BREAKING UPDATE: Colorado Court Affirms Tina Peters’ Convictions But Reverses Sentencing Back to Trial Court, Ignores Trump’s Pardon and Supremacy Clause of Constitution”

  1. Sad day? The court ordered resentencing, that will almost certainly mean a reduction in Tina's sentence. She could get off with time served for her crimes.

    Seems like good news for Tina to me.

    • No way, resentencing is a crock of legal vomit that makes no difference when the trash called judges are involved

    • The appeals court sent her case back to the court that sentenced her.
      I don't see that as any victory.
      They wanted her to die in prison. Why would they give her any 'time served'.

        • "A division of the Colorado Court of Appeals affirms Tina Peters’ convictions but reverses her sentencing back to the trial court."

          Affirms means her conviction is kept as is. They did not throw out her 9 year sentence. The case was brought to them to try and get it thrown out, but they did nothing but tell her lawyers to go back to the lower court for resentencing.
          All the appeals court did was state that the trial court had erred in imposing her nine-year prison sentence.
          I don't think the lower court will do anything but keep it.

          • They kept her conviction but threw out her sentence. They will decide on a new sentence which could mean little to no more jail time.

  2. It's appalling what they have done to this woman and others who tried to expose them.

    Having said that, it would be refreshing if Trump's DoJ would use some of the same tactics to bring the truth to light in the same way Biden's DoJ used them to hide the truth.

    Sadly it looks like Bondi will never do that.

  3. I'm surprised Trump hasn't been more active and forceful in this obvious and corrupt case of persecution against a political ally and gold star mother.

    • What do you suggest he do? He has no authority to negate state crimes or punishment.

      He had the DOJ make an effort to convince a Federal Judge to get involved, but the judge said no.

      • Honestly the easiest move would be to trade an executive order guaranteeing Colorado's water rights for clemency. Polis would absolutely make that deal. Especially right now with Colorado facing an unprecedented summer drought.

        • I'm on Tinas side, but that argument has no chance. Nothing unusual about going to jail after being convicted in a court by a jury. Even though it was a sham.

          You are misinterpreting.

          • Which is why it's been thrown out and is going to resentencing. My guess is she is out of prison very soon and on probation.

          • That is why we have appeals courts at state and fed level.

            Trump can do nothing more than he already has, but a better chance would have been for the DOJ to sue on her behalf for the state violating her civil rights …. both as to the charges AND for the sentencing as you just stated.

            In any case, it would take a Federal court to do anything about her civil rights … since the commie run state thinks it's fun.

  4. There is forensic evidence because of what she did, yet yet the DOJ does nothing Fire Bondi. And I don't think Harmeet dhillon is worth that much when you have forensic evidence and you have report number 3 by a computer expert what why are you do nothing with it.

  5. With all the power of the Federal government behind it our justice department can't figure out a way to make live so miserable for this judge and da that Tina gets released?
    I find that very hard to believe.
    They just aren't trying.

  6. Ms. Peter's supposed criminal actions were committed specifically to enforce a federal law requiring the security of voting records in a federal election. The problem is that Colorado's election rules conflict with federal laws: it told her to do one thing (i.e., delete the voting records), while the federal government required her to do the exact opposite (i.e., retain the records). In this and all other cases, federal law supersedes state law according to the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. I say enough of this crap. Our U.S. Constitution is completely clear on the matter. The President and/or DOJ must send federal law enforcement officials to free Ms. Peters immediately!

    Then they should either take over and run future federal elections in Colorado or bar the state altogether from participating in federal elections. How can a state be allowed to hold and affect the result of federal elections after openly showing it will ignore and defy federal requirements?

  7. America is sinking in a sea of corruption and the honest folks have been swallowed first. Politicians hand them anchors then shove them over the side.

  8. This woman is innocent of the fake crimes they convicted her of. She is only in prison because she caught the actual criminals cheating and stealing an election. Those responsible for this travesty belong in Gitmo awaiting escorts to the gallows for treason.

  9. Yes, yes, and yes….but Tina was convicted of a state level crime, not federal, and there is no jurisdiction/supremacy with respect to a Presidential pardon. If B1den had intervened at the state level, we would be "heap big mad".
    I think the mistrial is the way to correct this – and then hopefully T1na can sue the ever-lovin' ch1t out of the state of CO.
    Don't get me wrong, this is a travesty and she was doing her job. This is lawfare of the highest order. I'd almost like to see federal troops go in and rescue her from the prison.

  10. Thou shall not bear false witness. If this isn't a fine example of bearing false witness… That being said, God's word means NOTHING to DemonRats. And that being said, just because His words mean nothing to you, that doesn't mean you escape his wrath.

  11. She's 100% a political prisoner, but perhaps a clever workaround would be to charge Tina Peters with federal crimes, have her plead guilty, find that the federal charges supersede the state charges (as part of the case), then let her free because she was already pardoned.

      • "Convicted" and "sentenced" of two separate crimes, and both violate the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

          • The courts literally said she was convicted and sentenced for two separate crimes. Just play the video.

        • The Supremacy Clause says federal law is “the supreme Law of the Land” and preempts conflicting state laws. It is not a get-out-of-state-jail-free card. It does not automatically invalidate a state criminal conviction or sentence simply because the defendant claims some tangential federal interest (e.g., “preserving election records”).

          Supremacy Clause immunity from state prosecution is narrow, it generally protects federal officers/agents acting within the scope of their federal duties when those acts are “necessary and proper.” Peters was a county clerk performing (or failing to perform) her state duties. The appeals court said she doesn't qualify.

          Her state crimes are entirely separate from any hypothetical federal offense. Under the dual-sovereignty doctrine, the same underlying conduct can be prosecuted by both sovereigns (state and federal) without violating double jeopardy or the Supremacy Clause. A federal conviction or plea would not “supersede” or erase the state one.

          Even if the federal government now brought charges, pleading guilty federally wouldn't vacate the state judgment. The state conviction stands on its own until overturned through state appeals, post-conviction relief, or a state pardon/commutation by the governor and I think he took a pass on that.

          • You really argued hard against your own argument. I guess that’s something. You don’t need to respond to one of my comments while arguing against your own straw man argument.

            State laws conflicted with, not supported the federal laws that preempted them.

  12. My State is now so corrupt it resembles Communist Poland which I visited and played music in back in 1986…

  13. Well, all this tells us is that Colorado is up to their necks in VOTER FRAUD! Send in the US Marshalls, President Trump!

  14. All the judges are blackmailed and compromised to do the bidding of criminals. There is no equal justice in this country and I doubt there ever will be again.

  15. Yet the FBIs involvement showed the Federal Government was involved. Trump needs to come down on all involved like he's doing in Iran. God bless Tina, we're praying for you

  16. These Law Breakers all Need to be Taken out. The POTUS can do this and they have no say so in the matter….

    In WWII the U.S. Military Motto was,
    """" The Only Good NAZI was a Dead NAZI """"…!!!

    Trump needs to go after them…..!!!

  17. “IGNORES TRUMP’S PARDON AND SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF CONSTITUTION” because they aren’t relevant to state criminal convictions. Read the Constitution. And I believe that her conviction and sentence were political persecution.

    • It is Federal Civil Rights under The Eighth Amendment – Unusual punishment. Persons convicted of this or similar crimes have never received this length of sentence therefore it is unusual.

        • The lower court must find the "usual" sentence served and excessive sentence subject to civil court compensation by the State. Federal Justice should declare the Colorado actions absent the will and consent of the citizens of Colorado and therefor absent of any legal authority. All records to be expunged.

      • No. The appeals court found a potential problem because:
        • The judge may have penalized her for her speech (continuing to claim election fraud)

        That’s why resentencing was ordered. 1st Amendment not 8th.

    • The Supremacy Clause is relevant to state criminal convictions. The laws she was convicted on were preempted by the federal government for her specific case, because in her specific case the laws conflicted. That's the part you're missing.

  18. The viciously hypocritical and totalitarian courts in Colorado are doing the filthy, dirty work of the Democrat Communists who seek to convict their residents' thoughts, words and deeds in order to instill fear and compel obedience to Colorado's Secret Judiciary Police State similar to what existed in Stalin's compulsory Communist Hell Hole and to Hitler's Fascist Nazi "paradise."

    • Democrat Communists => Globalists

      The same thing is happening in many other States, and many other nations across the world.

      This is a part of a much bigger picture.

  19. We who live in this state already know how rotten the judicial system is. Only illegals have rights here.

  20. How hard is it for the DOJ to open an investigation to see how many of Tina Peter's Civil Rights were unlawfully violated, let alone all the election fraud in Colorado?

    Apparently, it's too hard.

  21. Here, I will make it easy. Send the DOJ down there, and GET HER, then arrest anyone and everyone that stands in the way.

  22. Is it true that Colorado's bizzare looking secretary of state Jena Griswold is a practicing wiccan witch? Nothing surprises me anymore with colorado

  23. Maybe, as cases like this unfold, people will start to understand how extensive the corruption is in Colorado, and in many other States in the USA, including the FERAL government, CONgress, and the judicial system, right up to and including the Supremely corrupt Court of the US.

    What good does it do to arrest and prosecute the Globalist stooges that are engaged in an effort to destroy the USA when there are Globalist stooges sitting on benches, pretending to be "judges", and will likely set the criminals free?

    Some of us feel like we are living in a Sci-Fi movie, like "Invasion of the Body Snatchers".

  24. Time to start the same repercussions in Colorado that had to occur in Iran in order to rout Colorado's Neo Totalitarian Communists and send them scurrying back to California.

      • No. We have to retake a Constitutional Republic from the filthy, dirty Communist judiciary that has no respect for the 1st Amendment and seeks to use locally enacted anti Constitutional laws to convict people exercising their Constitutional Rights.

      • No. I want to retake the Republic back from the Totalitarians who have expropriated swaths of land through laws. You seem to fail to understand how these United States were formed.

  25. The idea that the wording “the United States” must mean something different than “the several States” seems ridiculous, given that the US is indeed comprised of several States.

    Tina was railroaded and these people have no interest whatsoever in justice or letting her out of prison before she dies. They've admitted that if she's allowed to be set free, she'll talk.

  26. Damn Democrats to hell! This is pure evil. Trump should send the US Marshalls, arrest every judge, attorney, the demonic Jenna Griswald, EVERYONE, for conspiracy against rights. Then they should storm the f%$&ing prison, and take Peters from these despicable monsters. Stop effing around with Democrat scum!!!

      • Absolutely, let one Cockroach in Today and Tomorrow you will be Over Run. I saw it start happening here is Arizona approx 25 year's ago with the Leftist Cockroach's from California, Oregon and Wash St.

    • … for conspiracy against rights.
      18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law

    • They are not allowed to do that. She's been preemptively pardoned against any federal charges being brought against her, but Trump cannot pardon her original STATE convictions.

  27. Send in an armed unit of the US Marines to set her free. Colorado cops won't want to play war games. Guaranteed.

    • They are not allowed to. She was preemptively pardoned against any federal charges being brought against her, but Trump cannot pardon her original STATE convictions.

  28. If Tina Peters had all this incontrovertable evidence of fraud… where is it?

    Wouldn't the evidence of fraud been helpful in trying to exonerate her?

    Or at the very least… wouldn't the evidence of fraud show crimes committed by others?

    So, um: where is the evidence she found?

    • Just like in every case, where anyone was challenging the 2020 election, if they tried to provide evidence, they were immediately prosecuted. In the mean time, there is tons of evidence, and Tina had it on a hard drive, but they took it from her and would not allow her to use it in her defense.

  29. Trump should get involved, even if it means forcibly removing her from prison by the FBI, DHS, National Guard, or military. Then, let the fight begin.

  30. The Colorado supreme court is correct, Trump cannot pardon her because he lacks the authority to do so. Only the governor of Colorado can pardon her.

    • From what I understand from the article, the federal government under Biden was involved in the Tina Peters case (in the article it goes into detail of all the ways they were inolved). And because the federal government was involved, that means Trump should be able to pardon her, because it is no longer a "state" issue.

  31. The "supremacy clause" was not the issue. The original meaning of the word "States" was the issue.

    The ruling was designed to save face for the courts and prosecutors.

  32. Colorado should be investigated for a history of unusual sentencing. Reparations may be assigned for those suffering abusive sentences.

  33. If there was no federal crime then any evidence gathered by the feds should be disallowed as “fruit of the poisonous tree” and the case retried without that evidence.

    In fact, a new grand jury should have to hear the facts without that evidence and without any support of any opinions crafted by or on behalf federal officials.

  34. May ALL involved in the false conviction and imprisonment of Tina Peters rot in Hell … including those in the Sheriff's Office. Tina Peters was / is county employee hence Sheriff and deputies should have been involved.

    My father's adoption "father" was a Mesa County Deputy, to the day he died in 1967, under Sheriff Ray Reese.

    • A Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the County and is responsible for ALL law enforcement. Arguably, a Sheriff is the most powerful elected official in America. The Sheriff is usually the Conservator of the Peace and can act without warrant. The Sheriff is typically the Jailor and an Officer of the Court. Elections for Sheriff deserve more attention than what is typically given.
      The Sheriff protects you from bad government so elect one that is non-partisan and Constitutional.

  35. Are people opening their eyes to the corruption in the system we use to elect our representatives led, in this case by the "pristine", snow capped mountain, clear air image of Colorado? The snakes slithering through the judicial system. Moving back and forth to protect their vile, vicious and violent tactics against honesty and truth in our Constitutional Republic. Tina is taking the slings and arrows for every American citizen who wants justice and to see the criminality of 2020 fixed. The Colorado injustice system has kicked the can down the road. Bought themselves more time. This is also a moment for those who don't know who Tina Peters is to open their eyes, read, and learn what she is sacrificing for America and their own personal freedom. .

  36. Some will put up with it so long….Jena Grisbitch should not sleep easy….there are a number of ways to skin cat and there are some not happy with all this….Treason brings a final price for some

  37. hahahahaha "30 days in the hole" just keeps playing in my head peters played fafo AND LOST HAHAHAHAHA ……….hehehehehe

  38. Bureaucrats run Colorado, not the peoples government. Their justass is paid for by these jackasses. Time to repent Colorado.

  39. Colorado is so corrupt it used Tina Peters to send a signal to those who would try to expose that corruption. That's exactly what we have here. Makes me mad as hell.

  40. So I have this straight:

    1) Tina Peters found evidence of fraud… and likely crossed the legal line in order to do so,
    2) It took over a year for her to be sentenced and incarcerated.

    My question: if Tina found evidence of fraud… and she was free for over a year to show it to the press, or use it in her case… umm: where is the evidence of fraud?

  41. Next time, execute her for resisting. Just like ICE and the Minneapolis police get to do.

    "When officers arrived inside the bakery and approached Peters, she was placed in handcuffs for actively obstructing officers, according to the affidavit. As an officer was attempting to double lock the handcuffs, the county clerk allegedly used her right foot to try to kick one of the arresting officers. Peters was told by officers, “Do not Kick! Do you understand?” And “please relax,” the documents state. But the clerk replied by yelling, “No!”

  42. Ignoring bogus SCOTUS rulings is expected, and why they have no enforcement capability.
    Ignoring Presidential pardons is different.
    Trump, as the head LEO of the country, HAS enforcement capabilities.

    USE THEM.

    • Trump's pardon was a preemptive pardon against any federal charges being brought against her, but Trump cannot pardon her original STATE convictions.

  43. The Colorado judiciary is complicit in the incendiary dehumanization of an American Patriot. This is no different than Biden's vitriolic Department of Justice under the vicious totalitarian "Gulag" Garland throwing J6 patriots into their hell hole prison in order to demean and physically torture them.

  44. She's been pardon. Send it the US Marshall's and get her out. Your either the president or not.

    • It's way more beneficial for Trump to get her out closer to the midterms so that's why he's keeping her in prison for now. He'll need something to distract from the economy and the disaster in Iran and springing Tina from prison might just fit the bill.

    • She's been preemptively pardoned against any federal charges being brought against her, but Trump cannot pardon her original STATE convictions.

  45. it’s amazing they keep fighting so hard for this injustice even though they have been caught

    • Totalitarians always double down on their insidious actions when they have been exposed. It is their agenda to keep harming those who disagree with them.

  46. They don't have to do what moron Trump wants. His powers are limited in this case as they should be.

      • Donald Trump cannot legally pardon Tina Peters because she was convicted of Colorado state-level crimes, not federal offenses.

          • There is no precedent for convicting someone for a felony when a misdemeanor was the charge.

          • The court affirmed convictions on four felonies and three misdemeanors, including attempting to influence a public servant, conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, and first-degree official misconduct.

          • I'm glad you admit that she was not originally charged with felonies. The Judge changed the charge to a felony during the Jury Instructions. That's like going to trial for shoplifting and having the Judge change the charge to robbery.

          • You are incorrect.
            Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters was initially charged with multiple felony crimes in 2022. She was indicted on 10 counts, including several felonies, regarding an election security breach in 2021 where she permitted unauthorized access to county voting equipment. She was ultimately convicted in August 2024 of four felonies and three misdemeanors.

    • Only a political hack would fail to understand the implications of the degree of miscarriage of justice exposed in this case. The ability to leverage the judicial system to attack enemies hurts those who use that leverage as much as it does their enemies.

      Destroying the judicial system foretells grave implications on those who wreak the destruction.

      • Trump has done a lot to destroy the legal system. But not enough to pardon someone for state crimes.

          • Right we both agree that Trump has destroyed the judicial system and leveraged it to attach his perceived enemies but not enough to pardon someone for state crime convictions. Trump needs to destroy a bit more to get that done.

          • The judicial system was destroyed in 2020 for Tinal Peters. President Trump had the judicial system used to attack him starting in 2020 as well (93 charges in 4 states). All of which have been overturned by higher courts.

            Now that President Trump is using the judicial system to rightly expose the abuses and bring justice to those who abused the system, those individuals cry and complain.

            Maybe they shouldn't have thrown the stones while living in glass houses.

          • Trump was convicted of 34 felonies as he broke many laws and was proven to do so. Now Trump is using the DOJ to go after people that went after him. It is obvious.

  47. Between the J6ers and Tina Peters we see that the U.S. is a nation where patriots get thrown in jail for being good citizens and doing the right things.

  48. Apparently, the Colorado Court of Appeals is not out of the reach of political influence. With such a clear and undeniable misrepresentation of the charged offenses in jury instructions and subsequently the wrongfully assigned punishment, it is clear that this will be headed to the Colorado Supreme Court.

    If the sphere of political influence can reach the CSC, which I doubt. It will then be ripe for a SCOTUS decision.

    I've always felt that one of the lower courts would try to salvage their credibility by mitigating the punishment and throw this on the back burner, but they continue to press.

  49. SO WHY HAS A FEDERAL INVETIGAation into the state investogators and process here not being investogated…..where is dei kash?????

  50. Tina Peters is the female version of former Jair Bolsonaro, both being illegally detained and slowly being killed in prison and hospitals, doing time for saving their country from the world wide Kabal that serves satan.

  51. I said it this morning:

    "cruel and unusual"

    These guys will have GIANT TROUBLES IN THE FUTURE.

    If they murder her by keeping her in jail, their troubles could be even more gigantic.

  52. IF the dems take back full power this is going to happen to every conservative. This is disgusting.

  53. Trump is so pathetic he still thinks everyone is playing by the rules…..this is what happens when you elect a spoiled little boy that's lived a gilded life………

  54. Leftist Californians in Colorado is why that state is now ruined beyond all reason. Democrats ruin
    anywhere they land like a fatal disease.

  55. Why does TGP insist on attacking Trump by claiming that there is anything a president can do about state charges?

    There are no exceptions for any 1st amendment consideration or any other consideration.

    When Trump pardoned her it was a preemptive move against any other administration filing fed charges.

    That is all he can do.

    HOWEVER, the DOJ is able to open a fed investigation into many aspects of the trial and many aspects of the sentencing.

    But this nothing that because Tina had uncovered evidence of a federal crime means Trump can pardon her just baffling.

    The only factors that matter are her own fed and state charges.

    The fed decided to not charge her with anything while the state charged her with everything they could.

    Both have full discretion over whether or not to charge and what those charges will be.

    Trump has protected her from ever having to face fed charges.

    The state charges are legit charges even though they are not being used as intended.

    Lacking the clearance to a specific dataset, she borrowed the credentials of someone that had clearance to access the data.

    She then gave the credentials to a third party IT person to access and collect the data.

    Laws like this are needed to prevent insiders from allowing outsiders access to sensitive info.

    The law wasn't meant to aid law breaker efforts to manipulate the sensitive info.

    She absolutely did the right thing.

    The entire dept was compromised, she couldn't turn to them to ensure she carried out her duty by preserving the data.

    She didn't have the skills to do what needed to be done from behind a firewall.

    She was being prevented from performing her normal duty and needed help.

    The law doesn't make an exception for doing the right thing, the state has broken no laws by charging her.

    Where they broke the law was suborning perjury from their experts and not turning over exculpatory evidence…to name just two.

  56. What Colorado cop or State employee wants to die to keep Peters in jail, because if Federal Agents show up and demand she be released, that's a distinct possibility. (And what needs to happen)

  57. Now just imagine all the other people that are doing time by a corrupt system. We don't hear about them.

  58. As @disqus_lLSSzAFNHl:disqus said: "Free Tina, she did her job well. Her honesty and integrity, and doing her job is why she is punished" I agree 100% This case is an UGLY STAIN in our DOJ telling the truth can make you a criminal? I'm sorry DJT this is not the AMERICAN WAY! I stand with POTUS but this one right here is a hard pill to swallow.

  59. The citizens of Colorado need to understand how to use the Grand Jury and the Office of Sheriff. Knowledge, understanding and courage. Common will and consent. Learn to live free.

  60. So many of you are uniformed, and prove it with ignorant posts, because you limit your knowledge to very few news outlets. If you rely on gee pee and it's penchant for leaving out important facts you don't get the full story. Like the lady from Colorado. Or pillow guy and his political organization that the hffties and frog leg are part of and have their own agenda. If Colorado wanted to press on with their investigation of who set up the little lady the hoffites and pillow guy could be in a world of hurt thus these misdirection articles.

    The little lady was NEVER charged with anything election related thus any pardon for such is meaningless. She was convicted of stealing a mans identity, and exposed him to jail time for a crime he didn't commit, to allow an unauthorized pillow representative into a restricted area to tamper with election machines. She lied to coworkers to facilitate the identity theft and turned off the security cameras to allow the hacker to do his work and leave with information from the machines. Not knowing what the hacker did to the machines the state had to replace them costing over a million bucks.

    Mesa County is a small county, population 161,000. Any results from this county whether true or not only proves what happened in Mesa County not the state. Since the information was released by a 3rd party and not the little lady herself how do we know its the actual results. That news of the theft most likely was to legitimize bogus results posted by a 3rd party with an agenda.

  61. This is Mesa County, one of the reddest parts of Colorado and a +20 Republican area. She was convicted by a majority Republican jury, the DA was a Republican, and the judge was a Republican.

    These are old school Republicans who believe in law and order. Not Boulder or Denver where you get slaps on the wrist for felonies.

    She did the crime; she should do the time.

  62. Hey democRATS… what's with the handcuffs??
    Are you so afraid and intimidated by Tina Peters that you have law enforcement escort Ms. Peters wearing handcuffs with her hands behind her back? That behavior is both pathetic and sickening and is being utilized by communist democrats as a show of force to intimidate and demean Ms. Peters while also sending a strong message to any American (conservative, republican, Christian, MAGA, or patriot) who opposes the gestapo tactics used by the democrats to remain in power and to pursue their Marxist ideology and anti-American radical leftist agenda.

    SAVE AMERICA
    SAY NO TO DEMOCRATS
    MAGA

    • Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!
      If Tina had the "democrat sanctioned skin color," she would never have been convicted and probably would have been awarded several million dollars in reparations and would have been a regular on CNN, MSNBC and The View along with being a poster child for the demonRAT party.

  63. Poor Tina – just another hostage of the rigged election. No one will do anything for her – not even Trump.

    • If god cared she NEVER would have gone to prison would she? Where is this benevolent god of which you speak?

  64. Why can no one answer this seemingly easy question:

    If Tina found evidence of fraud… where is the evidence of fraud?

  65. The Colorado Court of Appeals is full of liberal hacks who were not very smart lawyers when they were appointed. All political hacks.

  66. Where is all the evidence of fraud Tina said she found?

    She was free on bail for a YEAR between getting charged and going to prison. Why didn't she produce it?

    She talks to Jim Hoft by phone from prison. Why didn't she just give the evidence to Jim, so he could get it out there? Why didn't she get it to Trump? Why didn't she publicize it everywhere she could… assuming the evidence existed.

    • I'm sure it was all confiscated after they fired her… They know she's telling the truth but making an example out of her.

    • they showed it in court where is the evidence that 2020 was stolen i have not seen any . does anybody have some proof it was stolen???? even fox's lawsuit lost because they did not have any. CAN SOMEBODY HELP ME???

  67. God Bless Tina Peters! Just another deplorable railroad job by the very same people we call our Government Crime Syndicate.

    • I DON'T CALL THEM THAT, MOSTLY OUT OF FEAR. THEY ARE MY BETTERS AND THEREFORE MY LORD AND MASTER. I KNOW THIS B/C SOME ACTORS AND TALKING HEADS TOLD ME SO.
      HAVE YOU NOTICED THE TALKING HEADS HAVE MORPHED OUR " REPRESENTATIVES" IN NOW WE ARE TO REFER TO THEM AS OUR LEADERS? WORDS MATTER LIKE EMIGRANTS*MIGRANTS, IMMIGRANTS ARE KEY WORDS THEY LIKE TO USE TO SOFTEN THE REAL TERM FOR THEM BUT REALLY THEY ARE ILLEGAL INVADERS.
      REMEMBER JUG EARS USED THE TERM ISIL INSTEAD OF ISIS. WHILE HANDING BILLIONS TO IRAN TO FIGHT….I ASSUME THEMSELVES B/C THEY ARE TERRORISTS THAT SUPPORT THESE GROUPS OPENLY
      ALL OF THESE SCUMBAGS ARE NO WHERE NEAR LEADERS,BETTERS OR BEACONS OF HOPE. THEY ARE JUST THIEVES IN SUITS DESTROYING AMERICA LIKE A SWARM OF LOCUSTS.
      Government Crime Syndicate. SEEMS ABOUT THE RIGHT TERM FOR THEM.

  68. I have to admit this whole Tina Peters tragic saga has me perplexed. Like another commenter said here we can go in and get Maduro and we can eliminate the entire Iranian regime but we can't free Tina Peters? Time to send the FBI to investigate the County and State arrest those under investigation and interogate them! Put the heat on you can hold them up to 72 hours in most cases people crack in 13 hours. There is no right or privilege that gets you out of jail any sooner than 72 hours and no you don't get to talk to an attorney you can have one present. Of course the attorney will need to be investigated and approved before he can gain entrance to the secure facility you are being held in. Start locking these people up and investigate them while they are locked up it's cops and robbers 101. I am so disappointed in Kash Patel caved to the deep state right away. They are going to destroy you, Kash, no matter what you do. You, Kash, need to find courage or quit.

    • THE PRISON REFORM ACT OF 2024 GIVES THE DOJ THE RIGHT TO ENTER AND REMOVES VICTIMS AND WITNESSES OF CRIMES WITH IN THE PRISON.

      PAM LEFT HER THERE TO ROT AND IT TOOK TRUMP 15 MONTHS TO FIRE HER. WE SAVED TRUMP FROM THIS VERY PERSECUTION AND HE OWES TINA FOR WHAT SHE HAS SHOWN THE WORLD. TRUMP BETTER GET IT TOGETHER OR HE WILL BE A VICTIM OF THE DEEP STATE PERSECUTION THE MOMENT THE LEFT GETS A CHANCE. THEY ARE OPENLY SAYING ANYONE CONNECTED TO TRUMP WILL BE PROSECUTED. APPARENTLY THEY ARE JUST GOING TO INVENT MORE CRIMES TO ATTACK PATRIOTS. WE ARE AT WAR AND PEOPLE HAD BETTER REALIZE IT SOON.

      TINA PETERS IS A POW ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT.

  69. These Colorado judges display the characteristics of infamous charlatans, fools, ignoramuses and mountebanks of every description. They are acclaimed geniuses, surfeited with the sickening adulations of a moronic population bathing in the affluence of their totalitarian hell. If there were an atom of truth, of honor, of intelligence in their damnable, accursed existence, Judas Iscariot would never survive among them. But he does, glowingly raining down his diabolical munificence on their sacrilegious, salacious and sanctimonious laws , life style and their sick and distorted love of despotism and tyrannical idolatry.

  70. The States don't get to decide where the Supremacy Law applies, that contradicts the spirit of the law entirely.
    The old burn at the stake needs revival.

  71. Secretary of State Jena Griswold has some illegal activity to answer for according to articles I've read. Course correction. Free Ms. Peters and use resources to investigate Ms. Griswold for actual crimes, none of which had better be against Ms. Peters. Excellent article.

    • NO I THINK ALL THAT THEY ARE ALLOWING TO BE REVIEWED BY THE LOWER COURT IS THE SENTENCING. SHE WAS SENTENCED AS A FELON BUT WAS CONVICTED OF MISDEMEANORS.
      THE DOJ HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INTERVENE UNDER "" THE PRISON REFORM ACT OF 2024 "
      PAM SHOULD BE ARRESTED FOR DERELICTION OF DUTY IN TINA PETERS CASE.

  72. IF THE BALLOTS INVOLVED ANY FEDERAL OFFICE, THE PRESIDENT DOES HAVE PARDON POWER. THIS IS UNDER "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW". ALL VOTING FOR FEDERAL OFFICES MUST BE THE SAME IN ALL THE STATES, NO "SMORGASBORD…CHECKERBOARD" HIT OR MISS VOTING FROM STATE TO STATE. THEY SHALL ALL BE EQUAL.
    SORRY FOR YELLING……….I'M REALLY ANGRY ABOUT THIS.

  73. IF THE BALLOTS INVOLVED ANY FEDERAL OFFICE, THE PRESIDENT DOES HAVE PARDON POWER. THIS IS UNDER "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW". ALL VOTING FOR FEDERAL OFFICES MUST BE THE SAME IN ALL THE STATES, NO "SMORGASBORD…CHECKERBOARD" HIT OR MISS VOTING FROM STATE TO STATE. THEY SHALL ALL BE EQUAL.
    SORRY FOR YELLING……….I'M REALLY ANGRY ABOUT THIS.

  74. This has gone on too long! Something is beyond amiss behind Tina's captivity! And the good 'ol U.S. of .A doesn't have political prisoners? Give me an effin break! Send in the dang Marines and set her free!

    • ROSS PEROT {HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT BIG SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS MAN} DID A MISSION TO FREE SOME OF THE IRANIAN HOSTAGES {HIS EMPLOYEES} B/C THE GOV. WAS NOT DOING IT. SO HE SENT HIS SON IN TO SAVE THEM. THEY GOT TWO OF THEM OUT.
      THAT IS THE AMERICA I WAS FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO GROW UP IN.
      HE WAS NOT ELECTED B/C THE DEEP STATE WAS TERRIFIED OF HIM. HE WAS SIMPLY TOO PRAGMATIC. A PROBLEM SOLVER IN DC WOULD HAVE BEEN BAD FOR BUSINESS.

      • I am 74 now, soon to be 75 (just a vapor). I remember Ross Perot quite well. I was always impressed with his charts. Good man, but you are right the deep state was afraid of him.

        • MY AMERICA SUPPORTS FREE MARKETS AND ABHORS CAPITALISM CORPORATE OPPRESSION. I IMAGINE ROSS PEROT FELT THE SAME WAY. AMERICA LAUDS THE WRONG PEOPLE AS HEROES. I WAS NOT AWARE OF JUST HOW GRATEFUL I NEEDED TO BE TO THOSE THAT CAME BEFORE ME. AMERICA IS FALLING B/C WE ARE NOT SUPPORTING THE NATION SO THAT THOSE THAT FOLLOW CAN BE PROUD AND GRATEFUL TO US. GREED AND APATHY HAVE ALL BUT ENDED US. I WAS YOUNG AND KNEW ROSS PEROT WAS ONTO SOMETHING. I SAW WHO HE WAS. HIS SON IS A HERO, MY LEGACY IS NOT WHAT HIS IS. SUCH A SHAME. ;) THANK YOU FOR ACKNOWLEDGING MR. PEROT. ;))

    • THAT PLACE WAS A TOILET IN THE 90'S FROM THE 1ST WAVE OF LEFT WING ALPHABET PARTY CALIFORNICATERS. NOTHING MORE SCARY THAN A GUN TOTING LIBERAL THAT THINKS YOU ARE A DANGER WITH NO RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. THEY ARE A TRULY EVIL STRANGE BATSIHT CRAZY GROUP.
      FENCE IT OFF AND TAKE THE LAND BACK AFTER THEY ARE DONE EATING EACH OTHER. AFTER THAT PURGE EVEN THE WILD LIFE MIGHT BE INFECTED WITH WHAT EVER AILS THE LEFT.

    • THE APPEALS COURT RULES HER PROSECUTION OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF LAW INCLUDING HER SENTENCE. INSTEAD OF RIGHTING A WRONG THEY JUST RETURNED THE SENTENCING THE THE LOWER COURT. TINA PETERS IS A POW ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT. A REAL DOJ WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO FIND A CRIME ON THESE LAWLESS VIPERS.
      IN ANY EVENT THE PRISON REFORM ACT 2024 ALLOWS THE DOJ TO STEP IN AND REMOVE HER BASED ON HER SAFETY,BEING ATTACKED AND BEATEN AS WELL AS BEING HELD IN SOLITARY FOR BEING ATTACKED AND BEATEN.

  75. Using the supremacy clause to try and enforce a presidential pardon on a state crime is a very bad idea. Had that been allowed when Joe Biden was president, he would have pardoned every murderer on death row and every illegal alien currently being held in prison. Just because it sounds great in this case, doesn't make it so.

    • ****The Federal Prison Oversight Act 2024***** THIS GIVE THE DOJ THE RIGHT TO "INSPECT AND CORRECT PRISONER ABUSE" WITNESSES AND VICTIMS CAN BE DETAINED IN FEDERAL CUSTODY.

      FREE TINA PETERS NOW MR PRESIDENT.

  76. It wasn't just this, but Colorado was added to my list of blue shithole states I will never visit and never give them a dime of my money when vacationing. Too bad. I can't visit the NE and most of the west anymore. Hawaii? Nope.

    • ****The Federal Prison Oversight Act 2024***** THIS GIVE THE DOJ THE RIGHT TO "INSPECT AND CORRECT PRISONER ABUSE" WITNESSES AND VICTIMS CAN BE DETAINED IN FEDERAL CUSTODY.

      ANYONE CARE TO EXPLAIN WHY TINA PETERS IS STILL IN JAIL PRISON?

      FREE TINA PETERS NOW MR PRESIDENT..

  77. Trumps clown Doh Dept, same worthless imbeciles as in 2016 different names, he is compromised and being made a fool of

  78. WHO ARE THE REAL VILLIANS WHO WILL NOT LET PRESIDENT TRUMPS PARDON TAKE PLACE? THE REAL CRIMINALS KEEPING HER LOCKED UP MUST BE JAILED!

  79. “Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.”

    ― Benjamin Franklin

    • TRUTH BE TOLD I NO LONGER WANT JUSTICE……..I WANT REVENGE. I CAN NOT IMAGINE A "FAIR" RESPONSE TO THE CARNAGE,LOSS OF LIBERTY,LOSS OF FREEDOM AND GENERAL SENSE FEAR THESE PEOPLE HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH INFLICTING UPON AMERICAN PATRIOTS AND THE SANCTITY OF OUR HOME AND HOMELAND.
      THE LEFT LOVES TO IMPRISON LITTLE OLD LADIES AND MEN WHILE ALLOWING PREDATORS TO ROAM FREE. CIVILITY SHOULD NOT BE CONFUSED WITH WEAKNESS. THOSE WHO HAVE SEEN WAR ARE RETICENT TO START LIVE ACTION HERE ON OUR SOIL BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THOSE PROUD AMERICAN PATRIOTS WILL NOT COME TO THE CONCLUSION…..MANY MANY MANY AMERICANS ARE COMING TO ACCEPT , ALBEIT RELUCTANTLY…… WE ARE NOT VOTING OUR WAY OUT OF THIS …..WHEN THESE VIPERS IN POWER DON'T EVEN ALLOW US TO VOTE BUT RATHER PROVIDE THE ILLUSION OF HONEST ELECTIONS.

      MAGA OWES TINA PETERS HER FREEDOM AND THIS ADMINISTRATION HAD BETTER FREE HER NOW.

      OF COURSE THIS IS ALL JUST MY HUMBLE OPINION

  80. Did you really expect the Nazis of CO to have a heart? I dealt with these fascists back in the 90s….all about their power and money!

  81. You never trust government to do what is right. They are immoral and corrupt. Why people want someone to rule over them mystifies me. Tina is being persecuted for the crimes others committed and she tried to expose. But this world is ruled by Satan and good people will always be hated. Even Jesus said this.

  82. Every single member of the corrupt Colorado government that has illegally imprisoned Tina Peters needs to be arrested, and upon their much deserved convictions, be sent to prison for 10 times the length they illegitimately sentenced Mrs. Peters.

  83. If it were simply a "state's issue", then why was Christopher Wray and his minions, and the old bigot's AG, Meretricious Garland, involved?
    Just because they only charged Tina with 'state crimes', to try and make sure she couldn't be pardoned, does not forgive the state of involving the fed.
    If it were simply a 'state crime', then they would not need to bring in any federal officials, or agents.

    Harmeet Dhillon needs to push a little more resources into Colorado and prove they stole the election. Then Tina's case disappears.

    • It is a very common occurrence for state prosecutors to coordinate with federal agencies in their cases. That doesn't all of a sudden make the charges federal charges instead of state charges.

          • legal…schmegal. It was a Federal election, and the Feds were involved in the prosecution.
            Tina caught Colorado and Dominion cheating red-handed.
            You're on the wrong side of the truth, and your footing is getting more and more slippery.

        • State prosecutors will often coordinate with the FBI and other federal agencies. It only makes sense to share information.

          • Only if there is a question of federal jurisdiction.
            No state AG will allow their prosecutors to involve the fed if there were no worries about their case. They lose control when the fed steps in.
            Colorado did 'coordinate with the fed', for sure, but not in the legal sense . . . only to try and secure a conviction that appeared to be reasonable.
            And, they worked with the most corrupt federal bureaucrats ever to occupy their offices.

          • Not correct, state attorneys absolutely work with federal agencies on cases if the agencies can provide information or support to help the prosecution.

            Feel free to do a little searching and you'll see that this is not uncommon, and not just for jurisdiction questions.

          • I did not say they do not.
            I said they only do if there is a concern over jurisdiction.
            Checking federal databases and records, and past criminal histories is not the same as bringing some federal agent and the actual USAG and director of the FBI into the district to work the case with them.
            The fed does not offer help unless the case has some territorial boundaries that might be or is in dispute.
            The only reason Colorado did is because they are corrupt and needed the help of their fellow corrupt federal counterparts to make sure their case flew.
            Christopher Wray wrote the grand jury indictment for Tina Peters.
            What business is it of his office to do that?

          • They work with federal agents, not just checking databases. Again, feel free to check it out, there’s plenty of readily available cases that prove this. Or not, that’s cool too.

          • And there isn’t any reason they shouldn’t.

            But the point is it muddies the waters and circumvents the Constitution if the Supremacy Clause can’t be applied to the result.

          • I don’t believe it muddies the waters at all, but I do get your point. As long as the case is a state charge, I don’t think it matters who helps gather evidence for the prosecution.

            But maybe I’m wrong, I guess we’ll find out if it actually gets litigated.

          • Mark Cook is sharing information and evidence with the whole world right now.
            It shows the exact same fraud that Tina's work uncovered.

  84. Colorado’s Democratic judicial and legislative branches reflexively ignore, obstruct or oppose all things Trump.

  85. Colorado can't have her free because she would entirely undo their fraud. She has the receipts on them.

  86. It’s standard law that Presidents can’t pardon state crimes. The lawyers in the DoJ know this. They won’t be rushing to do anything.

    • Yet he was not too old and decrepit to supposedly be President. I never knew why no one used that to have him removed from office.

      • OUR GOP IS ALL RINO. THEY TAKE TURNS OPPOSING EACH OTHER TO CREATE THE ILLUSION THEY ARE NOT ALL UNIPARTY. BIDET NEVER EVEN KNEW HE WAS IN OFFICE. IT TOOL SOMETIMES WEEKS TO PREP HIM FOR A PUBLIC OUTING. DOPED UP OUT OF HIS MIND WITH BLACK EYES AND SHAKING HANDS WITH GHOSTS WAS THEY BEST THEY COULD DO AND YET NO ONE SPOKE OUT OTHER THAN A CNN OF FAUX NEWS "APPEARANCE" THESE "REPRESENTATIVES" DESERVE A SPECIAL KIND OF JUSTICE.
        THE SAVE ACT IS PROOF THESE PEOPLE DONT REPRESENT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

  87. Start looking into these corrupt judges, if you're this corrupt you will definitely find other offenses like mortgage fraud and so on.

  88. Haven't Spent a dime on Colorado since this began we have family there and enjoyed spending vacation there but never again

  89. Then why were the Feds there? We know why but they were there so that makes it Federal. Don't care how they word it.

  90. Praying for Tina Peters. May she know the peace that passes all understanding while she endures this travesty of justice.

  91. I hate what Colorado has done to Tina, but Hoft needs to stop getting some posters excited over a claim that is false. No, a President cannot pardon someone for state crimes.

  92. Court overturns prison sentence of Colorado 2020 election denier Tina Peters
    abc fake news. Worthless!!!

  93. The President can close the airspace over Colorado until the State Demons fold and release Tina. He just lacks the balls.

  94. RI uses the same bogus system for elections since 08 or 10. It's never been right since. How many states don't even realize they have no vote?

  95. God bless President Trump. No one has been more proactive and steadfast in pursuing the release of Tina Peters. I am sure that he's got multiple projects in the works to free Tina that we don't even know about. Stay tuned….

  96. What a miscarriage of Justice. Let her GO. PERIOD. There may be little justice in this world, but it will be made right in the next, thankfully.

  97. President Trump, it's no longer enough for you just to say Tina should be released. You need to start taking some actions against Colorado officials including the governor who said he was going to grant clemency. Now she has to wait who knows how long to shuffle back through the courts.

    • Governor Polis said he was open to clemency. It was basically an invitation for Trump to come to the table and offer him something in return but Trump hasn't acted on that.

  98. You have forensic evidence of the machines, you open a case and Peters is a witness. No can do? so something stinks in the Trump's DOJ

  99. When are Americans gonna realize our laws and our Rights are fake. That government can and will do whatever they want to America and there is no one coming to save us. From local to state to federal government it has all abandoned the American people and needs to be destroyed by the people. The insanity has to end and voting doesn't change anything.

  100. Peters was an agent for the federal government if she was securing votes for the federal election, which she was.

  101. Murderers walk the streets, but someone who casts a shroud over a politician's rigging of an election gets buried under the jail. Anything for power.

  102. So if they can ignore the law and the constitution, which makes them criminal and their actions illegal and illegitimate, does that mean we can also pick and choose what laws and when we follow?

      • Your bank is going to perform (without your permission) a "Trusted Build" on your savings account. If you object because there is an obvious discrepancy after their "Trusted Build", the bank will refer you for criminal investigation and bring you into court.
        The court won't hear any of your clear evidence that you were robbed… they will only listen to the bank's version. They do this because the 'judge' deems you to be a charlatan and a snake-oil peddler.
        The bank's management is happy..they've seen it all before.

      • If you told me you not only jay walked but you jay walked onto grass aka land that had a house with people living in it for decades and because you jay walked, that makes you an owner as you were a victim of the jay walk..

        That would be impressive..

  103. Colorado, like AZ, NM, CA
    are Messican Cartel Associations of Mexi-States
    which are taking back Stolen Lands
    If you want to keep them, you will have to Defend Them.
    Otherwise, they are here for the taking.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter, President of MCA.

  104. She didn't violate the Constitution. She did carried out the mandates of her position. Our laws have been so twisted by dark forces that no one understands them anymore. I guess that is "their" goal. Free Tina Peters.

  105. Tina gets out and Polis the pole smoker along with secretary of state will be looking at long term jail sentence when the feds get a hold of Tina and get the info she has…

  106. Political persecution by the left is ongoing. Expect it to ramp up if People don't fight back.

      • State convictions don't apply to superseded laws, and she wasn't sentenced based on a state conviction, she was sentenced based on something she wasn't convicted of.

  107. If it wasn't already 100% obvious that Tina Peters is a political prisoner, then the fact that they sentenced her for a crime that she wasn't convicted of in any court should make that clear.

  108. Just the statement of Rubinstein that informed the group of their need to anticipate defending themselves as prosecutors says everything we need to know and that is they knew prosecutors were doing something wrong. As they say the buck stops at the top, Rubinstein if he authorized or approved any civil rights violations against Tina he should be criminally and civilly liable personally for damages. Also the case points out that the Courts are totally out of control and our civil rights are in jeopardy.

  109. Hoping Tina still has all the election information in safe keeping somewhere. Also, praying she gets out of prison soon and sues Colorido for a Gazillion dollars.

  110. Colorado has gone full commie even more than California. The CCP has to be involved in this injustice.

  111. Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution guarantees a Constitutional Republic form of government to each state. Installing the "Trusted Build" and forcing Colorado Citizens to use voting machines that have been proven to allow remote access to foreign agents is an act of treason. The 3 counts of attempting to influence a government official were against officials that were installing the trusted build. In other words if someone is committing a murder you better not take a picture of the crime or the full force of the law will be used against you and the person committing the murder will be given an award.

  112. This woman is innocent of the fake crimes they convicted her of. She is only in prison because she caught the actual criminals cheating and stealing an election. Those responsible for this travesty belong in Gitmo awaiting escorts to the gallows for treason.

  113. It's like the US trying to free an American citizen being held hostage in a foreign communist nation.

    For all intents and purposes, Colorado is iike a foreign communist nation, they're no different; the evil of communism on full display.

  114. The Biden administration has abused so much power attacking Republicans and conservatives with vigor and hate! Colorado should be ashamed of itself, but that place has turned into a Democrat shit hole!

  115. Problems is Congress does nothing to stop all this election fraud. They won’t even pass the save act. We have no voice in Congress anymore because they’re all a bunch of uni party Scumbag! Conservatives have to do a better job of organizing and protesting, and make our voices heard!

  116. Jenna Griswold should be in prison for leaving numerous voting machine passwords all over the Web…Shes the actual criminal…thats why she's keeping Peters in prison.

  117. This has to be the most flagrant example of judicial corruption, misconduct, and abuse I’ve ever witnessed. Everyone involved MUST be rounded up and prosecuted, and if found guilty, the egregiousness of Ms. Peters’ treatment DEMANDS capital punishment. No exceptions! ENOUGH ALREADY!

      • ****The Federal Prison Oversight Act 2024***** THIS GIVES THE DOJ THE RIGHT TO "INSPECT AND CORRECT PRISONER ABUSE" WITNESSES AND VICTIMS CAN BE DETAINED IN FEDERAL CUSTODY.

        ANYONE CARE TO EXPLAIN WHY TINA PETERS IS STILL IN JAIL PRISON?

        FREE TINA PETERS NOW MR PRESIDENT.

      • ****The Federal Prison Oversight Act 2024***** THIS GIVES THE DOJ THE RIGHT TO "INSPECT AND CORRECT PRISONER ABUSE" WITNESSES AND VICTIMS CAN BE DETAINED IN FEDERAL CUSTODY.

        ANYONE CARE TO EXPLAIN WHY TINA PETERS IS STILL IN JAIL PRISON?

        FREE TINA PETERS NOW MR PRESIDENT.

  118. Herein lies the problem. Tina Peters has information that would send several politicians to the gallows.

  119. I am terrible, I would send in a task force and take her out of there by force and then I would put her in a position of importance with in the Government to deal with the rest of the idiots. since no one else feels compelled.

  120. While republicans refuse to arrest democrats for actual crimes, democrats are still persecuting Tina for exposing their voter fraud.

    • IN THE EVENT THEY RETURN TO POWER THEY WILL PROSECUTE TRUMP FOR EVERYTHING THEY CAN IMAGINE. HE STILL DOES NOT GET IT. EITHER HE DESTROYS THE DEEP STATE OR THEY WILL KILL HIM IN PRISON.
      MAGA VOTERS SAVED TRUMP AND HE OWES US HIS CAMPAIGN PROMISE AND HIS FREEDOM. WITH OUT OUR SUPPORT HE WOULD BE IN PRISON RIGHT THIS VERY MOMENT. THEY WILL PERSECUTE HIM MUCH MORE VICIOUSLY THE NEXT CHANCE THEY GET. HE NEEDS TO ERASE THEM WITH EXTREME PREDJUDICE NOW.

      MR PRESIDENT YOU OWE TINA PETERS A DEBT THAT WE MAGE ARE RESPECTFULLY ASKING YOU TO REPAY.

      RELEASE TINA PETERS NOW!…SIR.

    • PLACE A FROG IN BOILING WATER AND IT WILL JUMP OUT. PLACE A FROG IN COLD WATER AND HEAT IT TO BOILING AND THE FROM WILL SIT THERE AND DIE. THESE ATROCITIES ARE TOLERATED B/C THEY HAVE CONDITIONED US TO TRUST THE PLAN AND JUST TWO MORE WEEKS AND IT WILL ALL BE OVER….AD NAUSEAM. BOTH SIDE HAVE USED TO POWERS TO ARREST INNOCENTS TRYING TO RIGHT A WRONG TO THE POINT SELF DEFENSE IS ALL BUT LEGAL. EVERYTHING IS BACKWARDS AND TYRANNY REIGNS.

      FUNNY THING IS, POLICE ARE THE ONLY THING STANDING BETWEEN THE TYRANTS AND THE SERFS. PEOPLE CLAMOR FOR MORE POLICE WHILE THOSE SAME POLICE
      *HAVE NO DUTY TO PROTECT CITIZENS.
      * HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO LIE TO ANY CITIZEN WHILE THAT SAME CITIZEN CAN BE ARRESTED FOR LYING TO THE POLICE.
      * QUALIFIED IMMUNITY ALL BUT EXEMPTS THE POLICE FROM COMMITTING CRIMES UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW.
      * THE ARE SPECIAL LAWS PROTECTING THE POLICE, WHEREAS COMMITTING A CRIME ON A POLICE OFFICER IS A MAJOR FELONY BUT HIT A COP AND A CIVILIAN AT THE SAME INCIDENT AND YOU WILL LIKELY FACE NO CHARGES FOR THE CIVILIAN.
      * COMMIT A CRIME AGAINST A POLITICIAN AND YOU ARE GOING TO PRISON. COMMIT THE SAME CRIME ON A NEIGHBOR AND THE COPS WILL NOT EVEN COME OUT TO TAKE A REPORT.

      POINT IS WE THE PEOPLE ARE NO LONGER IN CONTROL OF OUR OWN GOVERNMENT OR LIVES….. WE ARE SIMPLY NUMBERS AND PAYCHECKS. STEP OUT OF LINE AND THE MAN WILL COME TAKE YOU AWAY. I AM NOT FEELING SO FREE ANYMORE….HOW ABOUT YOU.

      FREE TINA PETERS NOW!

  121. "Colorado Court Affirms Tina Peters’ Convictions But Reverses Sentencing Back to Trial Court, Ignores Trump’s Pardon and Supremacy Clause of Constitution."

    Democrats want to release all illegal aliens from prisons, especially the violent criminals and terrorists, but want to sentence a woman who was doing her job to nine years in prison.
    That's the democrats' way.

    • She's been preemptively pardoned against any federal charges being brought against her, but Trump cannot pardon her original STATE convictions. He does not have the power to pardon state convictions, only federal ones.

  122. So…..the courts can ignore Trump's orders, but Trump can't find the backbone to ignore their heavily biased, and mostly illegal decissions?

  123. This what communists do. As in the famous words of Lavrentiy Berias " Show me the man and I'll show you the crime" They will keep her locked untill she dies.

  124. Colorado is run by corrupt criminal totalitarian tyrants; they make North Korea look like a thriving democracy.

      • Did I trigger you, Skippy? Go put on your frog outfit and play with your 7et@rded No Kings friends on the highway. You know why Trump is president, because your Democrat “Kings” decided you 7et@rds were too stupid to be trusted with a primary vote, so they anointed Queen Cumalalot. Feel stupid yet? You should.

        • if you wanna suck the mini orange mushroom and SWALLOW the cum that comes out be my guess . see i voted for the orange cult leader in ’16 then i saw chaos after around 8 months if you do not see the chaos even then and NOW well keep on praying to your orange MASTER and do not forget to give him your money too and if protest throw you off (10 million people WOW that is like a new world record ) lets talk about all your orange GODS little pep rallies (lets see attacked 2 countries (no new wars), chaos in stock market ,gas prices (at least the egg prices are down and oooohhhh yeah epstien files) ok big smiles BIG SMILES

          • You sound like a 7et@rded 12 year old trying to sound cool. Go back to pouring beer on your hands and try to get your date in your pants drunk; maybe you might get lucky, but I don’t think that your right hand can be considered a “real” girlfriend, Cletus. So spanky, that monkey butt boy.

  125. BRUBAKER!

    ****The Federal Prison Oversight Act 2024***** THIS GIVE THE DOJ THE RIGHT TO "INSPECT AND CORRECT PRISONER ABUSE" WITNESSES AND VICTIMS CAN BE DETAINED IN FEDERAL CUSTODY.

    ANYONE CARE TO EXPLAIN WHY TINA PETERS IS STILL IN JAIL PRISON?

    FREE TINA PETERS NOW MR PRESIDENT.

  126. BUNCH OF CORRUPT CLOWNS ALL NEED TO SWING. The supremacy clause does apply when your actions are in adherence to mandates in federal law. Also the rest of the sentence was so ridiculously over the line in terms of cruel and unusual punishment. NO mention of that. No reference to jury being tainted by the weight of felony being misrepresented. No overturn because the judge should have known the crime was not a felony no matter what the jury recommended. The judge was wacked in the head. In no way is Tina a danger to society for preserving records mandated by federal law. She did not do immeasurable damage to election systems. There was no repair undertaken.

  127. Looks like another Democrat Vendetta. Punish hard to warn others not to challenge them. Looks like the military will be the only way to clean this corruption.

    • OR THE MILITIA…….CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEED.
      I PREFER THE US MILITARY BUUUUT THEY ONLY GO WHERE THEY ARE TOLD AND NO ONE SEEMS TO BE TELLING THEM TO CLEAN THE CORRUPTION TO DATE.

  128. They'll NEVER admit it, but this "trial court" sentencing might just honor her Presidential pardon by releasing her with time served and that's the main thing!

  129. While I will at least give a nod to the appellate court they took this step… it didn't go far enough.

    I can absolutely guarantee you the people who even put her on trial are criminals themselves. I have a great deal of experience in CSIRT and Cyber Response teams. Everything Tina Peters did was by the letter of a Cyber Security forensics collection right up to and including the collection of windows logs, firewall logs, server logs and router logs.

    She is guilty of nothing other than preserving evidence. Those who accused her and prosecuted her however are indeed guilty of destruction of evidence or failing to preserve evidence.

    And btw… if you doubt this, it takes less than 5 seconds to consult ANY Cyber Security specialist about the collection of computer evidence and what to collect… you don't even have to take my word for it… EVERY cyber security specialist understands this… its one of the most basic things you learn.

  130. So the appeals court realizes what a kangaroo court the first trial was. Then the appeals court tucks their tail to appease the criminal left. Hey now they are just like them.

  131. So, Colorado admits it is unusual punishment. We also know it's cruel. Isn't there a right not to experience cruel and unusual punishment in these United States?

  132. At this point, let’s just pray y her resentencing, she is released on time served.
    Even the garbage governor says the sentence was “ harsh.”

  133. This is an article with a BAD omission.

    I’m not sure why you wrote the article like this. You TOTALLY ignored what the court said about how the judge in this case trampled on Tina‘s free speech rights. How this wasn’t just a matter of missing, instructing the jury on a felony charge, but how the judge was prejudicial against her because he was afraid of what she would say and what she had been saying about how she felt the election was rigged. This is a very important statement the court made. They showed real disdain for how the judge acted. I am not sure why you admitted that from this article. Another case of Gateway writing that misses the mark.

  134. Our son lived in Colorado for quite a few years until he found a way better job in Florida. He couldn't wait to get out. Tina uncovered election fraud and that is a no no with lawless lefties. It should have been a mistrial at the least. Trump should send in the marines and free her. LOL. Our legal system is totally corrupt as it is.

  135. This case alone shows "just cause" for the removal of Pam Bondi as AG. The case against Tina Peters is one of the most glaring examples of grievous injustice, along with the incarceration of the patriots of Jan. 6, and both should have been taken care of on the first day of Bondi's affirmation as AG.

    Is justice still alive in America or not?

  136. Polis has been cautioned that God sits in judgement over him and all his minions.
    Justice happens — whether here or in the final Court.

Comments are closed.