News

Get The Latest

News

Get The Latest

Support Joe's Work

Subscribe

Help support Joe's work

Choose an amount

A Hard Shot Across the Bow: Is Louisiana’s Voting System Unconstitutional?

A Hard Shot Across the Bow: Is Louisiana’s Voting System Unconstitutional?

Louisiana Constitution Article XI, Section 2 explicitly requires that “Ballots shall be counted publicly and preserved inviolate as provided by law until any election contests have been settled…” (Emphasis added).

A recent State District lawsuit filed by a veteran state election official alleges that Louisiana’s voting system is facially unconstitutional because the State uses a purely machine- based voting apparatus called Direct Recording Equipment (DRE) to count the overwhelming majority of votes cast. (Scanlan-Callais-Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief v Landry and Hadskey[9278].pdf)

It is impossible to “publicly” count these votes, or to “preserve” them “inviolate” pending any challenges to the count because they are counted inside of a machine using proprietary recording software that only the machine manufacturer may access.
Apart from the sheer lunacy of shielding from full public audit the electronic mechanism by which a fundamental public right is secured (WHY is this allowed?), Louisiana’s current system is ripe for a constitutional challenge under the plain language of Article XI Sec 2: votes that are tabulated inside of a black box, beyond the view of the public, and not subject to independent audit, are clearly not “counted publicly” nor “preserved inviolate.” To suggest otherwise is beyond ludicrous.

ADVERTISEMENT

The vote count transparency mandated by Article XI, Sec. 2 assumes even greater practical importance considering the uniform opinion of forensic experts that electronic voting machines can be remotely hacked without election officials even being aware of it. Renowned cybersecurity expert Alex Halderman was crystal clear in his Louisiana testimony– in the presence of the current Louisiana Secretary of State- that machines are “a major security challenge because if they are hacked they can misprint or alter votes.” (And NO, the machines do not have to be connected to the internet to be hacked).

Under Louisiana’s current system, there is simply no way to determine whether such cyber fraud has occurred, or to what extent, because it is all done under cover of darkness that nobody is allowed to penetrate except the potential bad actors.

The Louisiana Constitution secures for the citizens of our State many inalienable rights and protections against tyranny: the right of privacy, the right of free speech, the right of worship, to name a few. Who would have predicted a year ago that Article XI, Section 2 would emerge as an equally vital constitutional safeguard? If this mandate is interpreted according to its plain words, and the court simply applies the law correctly and holds the Louisiana Secretary of State to this most important constitutional mandate, the days of proprietary, black box voting machines accessible only to those who operate under a cloak of impenetrable secrecy may soon be a relic of the past in Louisiana. In its place? Secure, serialized, counterfeit proof hand-marked paper ballots, publicly counted on the precinct level. This is what every reputable cyber security expert in the world supports as well as Elon Musk, Donald
Trump, and many others. And it is the only system that can satisfy the clear mandates of the Louisiana Constitution.

As Pope said, “Hope springs eternal.”

ADVERTISEMENT

J. Christopher Alexander Louisiana Citizen Advocacy Group

www.lacag.org

6 thoughts on “A Hard Shot Across the Bow: Is Louisiana’s Voting System Unconstitutional?”

  1. Totally agree and the Governor needs to sign executive order declaring november election to be by paper ballot hand marked and hand counted at each precinct.

  2. Paper ballots…. YES!! Voting machines, and those who have access to them, have proven to be unreliable, to put it mildly. Citizens have the right to vote and expect that their vote be sacred and honestly tabulated. For that to happen, voting must be by paper ballots after the voter is properly identified. Then, votes must be counted individually and in the presence of four (4) volunteers. Votes may be tabulated several times daily so as to avoid a logjam when polls close.

    The voting machines have proven to be unreliable and untrustworthy. They have positioned themselves to go down in history as a junked relic with no chance to be improved for further usefulness. Junk them all for scrap metal NOW.
    Paper ballots are the ONLY way we may have a fair election.

    This shall be much easier than you think and your vote shall remain sacred and honest

  3. Paper ballots are only favored by honest people. Any state that will NOT allow only paper ballots, hand-counted, is up to fraud. Count on it. Even the RNC, preaching mail-ins, is NOT trying to win for Trump.

  4. What i do not understood is in truth how you are not actually a lot more smartlyliked than you may be now You are very intelligent You realize therefore significantly in the case of this topic produced me individually imagine it from numerous numerous angles Its like men and women dont seem to be fascinated until it is one thing to do with Woman gaga Your own stuffs nice All the time care for it up

  5. I call bullshit. The CoLA demands a public counting. A Machine’s code can be checked by a moron.
    Load 1001 ballots marked for Canditate 1 and 1001 ballots marked for candidate 2.
    If the outcome is not split 50/50 the machines are rigged and the software is NOT such “that only the machine manufacturer may access.” MAY ACCESS? F- THAT !!
    CAN ACCESS is by who? THE PUBLIC! With the help of someone who can code.

Comments are closed.