Conservatives Control Purchasing Power of 3 out of 5 Households in the US

Study shows that conservatives in the US control the purchasing power of nearly 60% of all household purchases in the country.

We performed an analysis to determine whether conservatives or liberals account for more of the purchases of products and services in the US. To determine this we obtained various sources of data.

We first obtained the most recent information we could find regarding purchasing power per US household per state. This data was readily available from 2015. Next we obtained the number of households per state which was available from the US Census Bureau along with population. Finally, we obtained the number of representatives per party in the House of Representative for the same time period (2015). We used the US House of Representatives as it is a good estimate of the level of conservative versus liberal households in a state. By multiplying the purchasing power per household by the number of representatives per party per state we derived the purchasing power equivalent for each party.

Our results show that 57% of the household purchasing power in the US is related to Republican or conservative individuals. This is nearly 3 out of 5 household dollars that are purchased by conservative households. If you take away California and New York the results would be even more lopsided.

The results of our study are not shocking. In May of 2014 we performed an analysis of Congressional Districts at that time. The outcome of that study showed similar results. We collected the 2012 US census data housed at the government census site. We also obtained a list of Congressional Representatives and their party affiliation from the US Congressional website for the 113th Congress voted into office starting in 2012.

What we found from the US Census data was that Democrats were the party of the super rich with 14 of the top 20 richest districts in America being Democratic districts at that time. But what was also found was that 36 of the 39 poorest districts in America were Democratic districts. (Note that the data used at that time did not include the US territories of Guam, Samoa, Mariana Islands, Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico which are also represented by Democrats and are also very poor districts.)

The working class districts were represented by Republicans by almost a two-to-one ratio. If you excluded the 20 richest districts and the bottom 39 poorest districts there were 225 Republican working class districts and only 152 Democrat working class districts. Republicans overwhelmingly represented the middle class districts by almost a two-to-one ratio.

The middle class is the group that has the purchasing power in the US and the middle class predominantly votes Republican.

US corporations take note because conservatives are the people who buy your products and services. When corrupt and dishonest Soros funded liberal machines like Media Matters contact you to stop advertising with conservative media like the Gateway Pundit or Hannity know that the majority of country that buys products and services are conservative.

Soros and the Democrats stand with violent Black Lives Matter while Conservatives are your major purchasers. It’s an easy decision to choose which side to focus on (Hint – not Black Lives Matter).

Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s Brother Steven Wasserman Suspected of Burying Seth Rich Case

Former Head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, lost her position during the DNC Convention due to WikiLeaks emails being released that showed her efforts to enable Hillary Clinton to win the DNC nomination and steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders. Now Wasserman Schultz is back in the news. This time it is because of her close ties with the Assistant US Attorney at the Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia.

Wasserman Schultz’s brother, Steven Wasserman, is the Assistant US Attorney at the Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia. Questions are arising whether Steven has played a part in burying the Seth Rich case in DC. No one has yet been charged in spite of the many unanswered questions related to the murder case. Because Rich reportedly provided emails to WikiLeaks there are many who believe Rich was murdered as a result.

There are too many questions and coincidences for the Seth Rich case not to be investigated at the highest levels of the government.

 

A Complete List of the Many Questions Surrounding Seth Rich’s Unsolved Brutal Murder

Today will mark the first Memorial Day that the Seth Rich family remembers the life of their young son who died last year. On July 10th, 2016, 27 year-old Omaha native and Democratic staffer Seth Rich was murdered in an upscale Washington DC neighborhood. Rich was talking to his girlfriend and then suddenly told her he had to go. According to his parents at 4:18am in the morning there were two shots fired. Police found Rich conscious and breathing but he died later in a hospital. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”

Rewards for Information on Rich’s Death

The Metropolitan police in DC posted a reward for information on Rich’s murder.
Seth Rich Bloomingdale2

Then in August of 2016 Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich and its founder, Julian Assange, in an interview alluded to the fact that Seth Rich may have supplied the emails that WikiLeaks leaked during the election last year.

There are numerous others who have offered rewards for information on the death of Seth Rich. Jack Burkman, the head of the private, Washington, D.C. based Profiling Project investigative team, offered $105,000 reward of his personal money for information leading to the arrest of Rich’s killers. Earlier this month American businessman Martin Shkreli offered $100,000 reward for information on Seth Rich’s murder. One America News Network (OAN) has reportedly offered another $100,000 reward for information on Seth Rich’s murder. The total in reward money now stands at $350,000.

Questionable Information Regarding the Murder

Why was the Seth Rich murder so important? Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family. Then the DNC convention was then held a few weeks later and WikiLeaks dropped a bomb on the DNC by releasing a boatload of DNC related emails. The result was the firing of Debbie Wasserman Schultz as the DNC Chairperson and the revelation that the DNC gave the DNC Presidential nomination to Hillary Clinton.

There is various information on the Seth Rich murder online. According to reports, Seth Rich was gunned down and there is a video from a local establishment that shows the murder. Where is this video? According these same reports two men shot Rich. A public incident report filed after Rich’s death shows that three officers who responded to the scene of the crime were wearing body cameras:

But the Metropolitan Police claimed the footage was “lost” when met with requests to release the videos, which might have provided important clues. A May 21st, 2017 report by World Net Daily has also established that police failed to speak with staff at Lou’s City Bar (where Rich was last seen alive) to enquire about whether they had any pertinent evidence.

After being found Rich was taken to a DC hospital. Reports note that Rich was alive and well after surgery and that he was expected to live but these reports have not yet been confirmed. It has also been reported that a Dr. Sava who was an ER doctor a the hospital where Rich was taken was a Hillary Clinton donor and was a guest at an event held by Clinton’s campaign chair John Podesta. Seth Rich died in the hospital the morning that he arrived.

The Rich family hired a detective by the name of Rod Wheeler to look into the case. Wheeler reported that according to people he met with in the DC Police Department Rich had information on his laptop that connected Rich with WikiLeaks. But the whereabouts of the laptop are currently unknown and the DC Police have reportedly been asked to stand down on further investigation into the case. There are also reports that the DC Mayor, Muriel Bowser, has ordered a halt to the investigation.

There are mixed messages that the family is asking people to stop looking into the case. However, these appear false as a video from the family thanks people for their assistance in finding Seth’s murderers. The DNC assigned a spokesman to the family by the name of Brad Bauman who released information that the family wanted people to stop looking into the case. But according to WikiLeaks, Bauman is a hack used for PR crisis management by the DNC.

Judicial Watch has now requested murder investigation docs from the DC Police and DC Mayor.

Ties to Podesta, Clinton and the DNC

Mainstream Media (MSM) is pushing invalidated, unsubstantiated and crazy conspiratorial stories about President Trump colluding with Russia to win last year’s election. But liberal media won’t touch the story about former DNC staffer Seth Rich being gunned down in Washington DC last year. Why not?

Democrats and the MSM have argued that Trump somehow supplied DNC emails to WikiLeaks that impacted the election and gave the victory to Trump. This is of course is false on all levels. For example, DNC emails were released by WikiLeaks before the election but for the most part the MSM ignored them. Also, the emails did contain information that showed unethical, if not criminal, actions by John Podesta and Hillary Clinton before the campaign, but there is no information to date that proves that the emails released were in any way false or made up.

Hillary Clinton’s creepy former Campaign Manager John Podesta has a history of seedy and alleged illegal activity. The late Andrew Breitbart, entrepreneur and creator of Breitbart.com knew this back in 2012 (warning on language):

Breitbart was ahead of his time.

The WikiLeaks emails proved that the Clinton campaign was in cahoots with the media. At least 65 MSM reporters were meeting with and/or coordinating offline with top Hillary advisers. The emails also showed that as early as December 2015 Podesta discussed Trump’s “bromance with Putin” and the potential for using it as a means to slander Trump.

Again in April 2016, Podesta was busy conjuring up a Russia smear campaign against then candidate Trump.

The day after Hillary’s loss to President Trump, it is reported that Podesta and the Clinton campaign put the Trump/Russia smear campaign into full swing. Podesta and Clinton led this smear campaign in spite of having multiple connections with Russia themselves.

Hillary, through the Clinton Foundation, received millions from Russia in return for providing a large percentage of US uranium to Russia while Secretary of State under President Obama. As for Podesta, his own emails released by WikiLeaks show that he received 75,000 shares in a Russia President Vladimir Putin connected energy company and then in an apparent move to cover this up, gave the shares to his daughter.

President Trump even tweeted about the Clinton – Podesta connections to Russia, asking why the MSM doesn’t cover these seedy links.

The reason why the Democrats are pushing the Russia – Trump ‘fake news’ story may not primarily be because the Democrats want to smear Trump and his legacy. The more plausible reason is that the Democrats all know that once the President’s team starts investigating the Clinton Foundation, Obama’s illegal wire tapping and all the many other Democrat scandals and illegal acts, many of them are facing jail time. But there seems to be an even more determined push to stop the MSM from reporting on Seth Rich’s murder.

Seth Rich provided DNC emails to WikiLeaks shortly before his death and Kim Dot Com dropped a bombshell and revealed that he has proof that Seth Rich provided the emails to WikiLeaks. This evidence alone dismantles the Trump-Russia narrative. If Seth Rich provided DNC emails to WikiLeaks, is this why he was murdered?

Attacks on Those Reporting About Seth Rich Case

Efforts to investigate the Seth Rich murder case have been opposed. The detective investigating the Seth Rich murder case, Rod Wheeler, was contacted by former DNC Chair and CNN pundit Donna Brazile and confronted and asked why he was working on the Seth Rich case. TV and radio personality Sean Hannity reported on the Seth Rich murder case and this reportedly scared the hell out of top DNC and Hillary lackeys. He was apparently asked to stop reporting on this case. Who was behind this? If you google Sean Hannity and Seth Rich you will see a concerted effort by the MSM to paint the Seth Rich murder story as reported by Sean Hannity as a conspiracy story.

Why does the fact that Seth Rich was murdered in cold blood, shot in the back in a peaceful Washington DC neighborhood early in the morning last year, cause the DNC so much fear? Is it because the young man who provided DNC emails to WikiLeaks was found out and used as an example?

According to Podesta’s own emails this could be the case. Podesta wrote last year in an email released by WikiLeaks that he “would love an example being made” [of a leaker].


A cursory review of Podesta’s emails released by WikiLeaks show how seedy and dishonest Podesta is. But he seems more unhinged than ever before. Is Podesta scared about what will be found out about the Seth Rich murder?

According to a tweet by @Boca Vista on Twitter, the DNC used bots pushing a CNN story to attack Sean Hannity about the Seth Rich Story. The bots in this story are system generated tweets that are created to make it look like a number of individuals are sending tweets but in reality only one person or entity is sending many tweets.

Zerohedge reported that on May 25th a reporter from the media company OAN made a post on an online message board appealing for help in locating the doctor on duty the night of Seth Rich’s murder who treated Rich for gunshot wounds. Within minutes the OAN website was taken down.

Whoever touches the Seth Rich murder case is forcefully attacked by the MSM.

Open Questions Related to the Seth Rich Murder Case

As noted already, there are a number of questions surrounding the Seth Rich murder case. Here is a list of the many questions that remain:

We know two men murdered Seth Rich and were caught on camera doing it. Where is this video from the bar from that night?
Where is the police camera footage from the police onsite at the crime scene?
What did Rich tell the police?
What was the prognosis of Rich after his surgery?
Who was around Rich in the hospital and how did he die?
Where is the laptop with information regarding the link between Rich and WikiLeaks?
Who asked the DC Police and Mayor’s Office to stand down on the Rich investigation?
Who assigned Bauman, the PR crisis manager, to the case?
Why is the media not reporting about this case?
Who is giving the MSM orders to not report about the case?
Who is ordering social media to shut down stories related to this case?
Who is behind Sean Hannity being ordered not to report on this case?
Who is behind the bots used to shut down reporting of this case?
Why did the DNC not offer a reward for information on Seth Rich’s murder?
Why is former DNC head Donna Brazile asking to stop the investigation?
What does Hillary Clinton know about the murder?
Was Seth’s murder a hit ordered by the Clintons or the DNC?
We need to ask and find out where was John Podesta last year when Seth Rich was murdered?
Where was Podesta’s brother at the time of the murder?
Is there any connection between the Podesta brother’s and the Seth Rich murder in addition to the threats John Podesta made in emails?
How could the DNC ever allow someone to be so high up in their party as John Podesta or is this a prerequisite to being a top Democrat?
Why is John Podesta so interested in getting this story out of the hands of the Democrat MSM complex?
Will President Trump order an investigation into the murder case?

Ultimately, Seth Rich was just a number to Podesta and the DNC. Podesta and the DNC showed their true colors when after his untimely death, rather than offer a reward for information related to his murder, they named a bike rack after him.

Seth Rich was a hero and he deserves much more than that. He deserves justice!

 

FOX Cable News Set All-Time Viewership Record in Q1 but Since Firing O’Reilly It’s Down Half a Million Prime Time Viewers

FOX News cable set the all-time record for viewers for any news cable service in the first Quarter of 2017. According to its own press release:

FOX News Channel (FNC) finished the first quarter of 2017 with the highest-rated quarter ever in cable news history in 24-hour viewership, and once again topped cable in both primetime and total day according to Nielsen Media Research. Each hour during the 6AM-11PM/ET program lineup broke a network record with the highest-rated hours ever for a quarter with millennials tuning in to FOX News more than any other cable news outlet. Furthermore, The O’Reilly Factor not only had its highest-rated quarter ever in history, but it broke all previous records in cable news history for the highest-viewership ever for any given program in a quarter.

FNC completed 1Q’17 as the top basic cable network in both primetime and total day and marked 61 quarters as the top news network in primetime and total day, according to Nielsen. In both dayparts during 1Q’17, FNC was up double-digits compared to the same quarter last year, which included two of the network’s highly-viewed Republican presidential primary debates. Additionally, more millennials chose FNC as their leading cable news source over CNN and MSNBC in both primetime and total day than ever before (see below for Nielsen data).

Delivering its most-watched quarter ever in total day viewers, FNC averaged 1.7 million viewers (up 27%) and 359,000 (up 32%) in the 25-54 demo. In primetime, FNC marked its second highest-rated quarter with 2.8 million total viewers (up 20%) and 576,000 (up 19%) in the 25-54 demo. For the quarter, FNC dominated cable news competition in both primetime and total day combined in total viewers.

The daily per hour average viewers is reasonably less than the average viewers in the prime time hours which is why the daily totals are less than prime time totals.

In April FOX News again was number one on cable TV:

FNC once again topped all of basic cable in total day audience for the 10th consecutive month. The network also finished No. 1 in total prime time viewers for the 3rd straight month, and has now been cable news’s No. 1 network in total audience for 184 consecutive months.

In April FOX News had 2,441,000 total viewers / 488,000 A25-54 per day in the prime time hours and 1,498,000 total viewers / 325,000 A25-54 per day.

The decrease in viewers from the first quarter to April for FOX News was 1.7 million less 1.5 million for a difference of (200,000) viewers less in April than in the first quarter. in prime time viewers the difference was (400,000) (2.8 million less 2.4 million).

The website Adweek provides a list of daily ratings for Cable News. Using this data, the average total viewers for the month of May as of the 24th is an average rate of 1.624 for daily totals and 2.322 for average prime time viewers. Although the average daily viewers appears to have stabilized for FOX News cable, the prime time viewers continues to decline another 100,000 (2.4 million in April less 2.3 million in May). In total FOX News is down a half a million viewers in prime time since the end of March.

The cause for the decline in viewership in large part is because FOX News fired Bill O’Reilly who had the largest show on cable tv. In the first Quarter of 2017:

The O’Reilly Factor not only had its highest-rated quarter ever in history, but it broke all previous records in cable news history for the highest-viewership ever for any given program in a quarter.

As FOX Cable News continues to put on the air NeverTrumpers and others who berate President Trump expect its corner of the cable news market to erode. God only knows that there is a huge untouched market in America of President Trump supporters who would love to be able to turn on a cable news network without hearing liberals berate the President. If some news source ever discovers this, they will make millions.

 

 

‘Leaks’ Still from Far Left MSM Outlets Only, Still No Sources and Still All Out Effort to Attack President Trump

Per an updated analysis of the most recent so called ‘leaks’ being reported and repeated by the liberal mainstream media (MSM) involving President Trump, the probability that a portion of these ‘leaks’ are just plain lies remains very high.

The leaks are all being reported by very biased liberal MSM outlets that were adamantly opposed to the election of President Trump. These ‘leaks’ in all cases still are not supported with any names of so-called sources and in all cases the ‘leaks’ are meant to dis the President.

Former FBI Director James Comey reportedly made some statements in the ‘leaks’ but to this date he has not corroborated any of the statements he reportedly made after his firing as reported in the leaks. Comey was scheduled to go in front of Congress this past week but instead asked to reschedule so he could first talk to Comey’s predecessor at the FBI, Robert Mueller, who is now the appointed Russia Investigation Special Council. Hopefully Comey’s discussion with Mueller was recorded.

Date Media Outlet Reporting Stated Source Leak Rebuttal
5/26/17 NBC (Ken Dilanian, Peter Alexander and Courtney Kube) Multiple US Officials [not identified] Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and one of his senior advisers, has come under FBI scrutiny in the Russia investigation. “Does not mean they suspect him of a crime” noted in the same article.
5/24/17 New York Times (C. J. Chivers) Source [not identified] Published images of Manchester terrorist attack UK Prime Minister was outraged with release – disgusting with no regards for investigation or families
5/23/17 The Intercept (Jeremy Scahill, Alex Emmons, Ryan Grim) Sources at the Palace and the Department of Foreign Affairs [not identified] confirmed legitimacy Philippine government transcript of recent Trump – Duterte phone call Nothing criminal on call – Trump praised Duterte for handling drug problem in his country
5/22/17 Washington Post (Adam Entous and Ellen Nakashima) Current and former officials [not identified] President Trump asked two of the nation’s top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government President Trump stated that he did not ask Comey to end Russia investigation and Ex CIA Chief Brennan stated under oath that no evidence Trump or team pressured intelligence community to stop Flynn investigation
5/20/17 CNN (Pamela Brown and Gloria Borger) Source [not identified] Comey now believes Trump was trying to influence him on his judgement about Russia probe Not corroborated by Comey
5/19/2017 New York Times (Matt Apuzzo, Maggie Haberman and Mathew Rosenberg) Document summarizing the meeting [not provided] Trump called Comey a ‘Nutjob’ Russian FM Lavrov Refutes Claims That He Discussed Comey’s Dismissal With Trump
5/19/2017 Washington Post (Devlin Barrett and Matt Zapotosky) Sources [not identified] law-enforcement investigation into possible co-ordination between Russia and the Trump campaign had identified a current White House official as a significant person of interest No legal implications at all
5/17/17 Washington Post (Adam Entous) Audio recording (not in their possession) House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy says Putin pays Trump Those present said he was joking
5/16/17 New York Times (Michael S. Schmidt) Comey memo (not provided or admittedly seen by NYT reporter) Trump had asked Comey to stop Flynn investigation Comey testified under oath on May 3rd that he had never been pressured by Trump to stop any investigations
5/15/17 Washington Post (Greg Miller and Greg Jaffe) Current and former US officials [not identified] Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador National Security Advisor McMaster stated nothing shared that was not already public and article itself stated President has authority to declassify secrets.
5/12/17 The Hill (Jonathan Easley) One former transition team official with close ties to the administration [not identified] “It’s total chaos” [the White House] Constant message coming out of MSM not substantiated
5/12/17 ABC (Pierre Thomas, Zach Date and Tom Kutsch) Sources [not identified] Comey furious at lack of respect White House showed Not corroborated by Comey
5/12/17 CNN (Pamela Brown) Source familiar with the matter [not identified] Former FBI Director James Comey is “not worried about any tapes” of conversations between him and President Donald Trump Not corroborated by Comey
5/12/17 Daily Beast (Lachlan Markay and

Asawin Suebsaeng)

 

One official [not identified] White House staff react to Trump tweet with “Jesus” Not corroborated by anyone, another liberal hit piece
5/11/17 New York Times (Michael S. Schmidt) Two people who heard Comey’s account of the dinner [not identified] In a Private Dinner, Trump Demanded Loyalty. Comey Demurred. Trump denied this in NBC Interview
5/10/17 CNN (Sara Murray) Two sources [not identified] James Comey sought more resources for Russia investigation Current Director Rosenstein stated in a House probe that there was no evidence Comey asked for more resources for Russia probe

Evidence in Hillary Clinton’s creepy campaign manager John Podesta’s emails released before the election by WikiLeaks show that the Clinton campaign was in cahoots with the mainstream media. At least 65 MSM reporters were meeting with and/or coordinating offline with top Hillary advisors.

The WikiLeaks emails also show that as early as December 2015 Podesta discussed Trump’s “bromance with Putin” and the potential for using it as a means to slander Trump. Based on his emails, there is a very high probability that Podesta is behind the ‘leaks’ reported since the election. If Podesta is involved then the probability that many of the ‘leaks’ are made up is a likely scenario.

President Trump is handicapped at this point in his Presidency with the ‘leaks’ coming out and many blame this on the ‘deep state’ government that is currently in place. A large portion of the government is still basically run by the prior Obama Administration because Congress and the Democrats have done all they can to stall the appointment process with Congressional Republican leadership in no apparent hurry to place the President’s appointees as well. As of earlier this week, there were 455 key executive branch positions with Obama administration holdovers in many sections of the bureaucracy that are still in control.

Also, regardless of whether the ‘leaks’ are coming out of the government or are just being made up by someone like Podesta, the MSM outlets reporting these stories insulting the Trump Administration are showing the lowest form of journalistic professionalism.

Joel Pollak at Breitbart News provided this summary:

In their effort to impugn Trump, the [New York] Times and the [Washington] Post violate the most basic journalistic standards. Publishing parts of a document that you do not possess and cannot verify, and timing the release to cause maximum political damage (right after the president leaves the country), is not investigative journalism. It is political propaganda.

It is the mirror image of what the Los Angeles Times did in April 2008, when it published a story referring to a speech then-State Senator Barack Obama gave at a farewell celebration for radical Palestinian-American academic Rashid Khalidi in 2003. The Times was given a video of the speech, but refused to publish the video. Instead, it offered a mere summary, raising suspicions that the Times had sanitized the event to protect Obama’s presidential campaign.

The pattern is the same, from the Khalidi tape to the “nut job” story. For the elite mainstream media, when it comes to protecting Democrats or attacking Republicans, there are no journalistic standards, no ethics, and no shame.

Pollak is right. Liberal reporters in the MSM have no ethics and along with their mentor Podesta are out to get President Trump.

Fortunately for President Trump, the majority of the US that voted him into office stopped reading ‘failing’ newspapers like the New York Times and stopped watching MSM media outlets like ‘real fake news’ CNN.

The President has the law on his side. Attorney General Sessions needs to add these entities and individuals to a growing list of corrupt swamp dwellers that he needs to bring to justice.

Drain the Swamp!

Ignoring President Trump Standing with 50 Muslim Leaders in Saudi Arabia, Liberal Judges Claim Trump’s Bigotry is Reason to Rule Against Travel Ban

 

Liberal Appellate Court Judges today ruled that President Trump’s proposed travel ban is illegal because of their perceived belief that the President is bigoted against Muslims disregarding the fact that he just stood with 50 of the world’s top Muslim leaders in Saudi Arabia in unison against terrorism!

The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today against the President’s temporary travel ban stating it:

“speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus and discrimination,” a federal appeals court said Thursday in ruling against the executive order targeting six Muslim-majority countries.

The Trump administration vowed to take the case to the Supreme Court with Attorney General Sessions stating that the court’s ruling blocks Trump’s “efforts to strengthen this country’s national security”.

The courts to date have based their decisions in part on fake news while a liberal attorney at the ACLU said that if Hillary Clinton had put it in place it would be legal. Obama holdover Sally Yates who was acting Attorney General before her firing for not implementing the travel ban was told that the ban was legit but decided to play politics anyways. Leftist judges and their Mainstream Media (MSM) friends are doing all they can to call President Trump a bigot and shut down his travel ban in spite of the majority of Americans agreeing with the President.

The Chief of the liberal judges was clear in his determination that the President was a bigot which apparently is greater than the law:

Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory wrote that the government’s “asserted national security interest … appears to be a post hoc, secondary justification for an executive action rooted in religious animus and intended to bar Muslims from this country.”

In early February we shared a post at the GWP arguing that the President would wait to take the travel ban to the Supreme Court until Justice Gorsuch was in place on the Court. The Supreme Court at the time that the first liberal court stepped in to block the President’s travel ban was made up of four far left liberal judges appointed by Democrat Presidents and four judges appointed by Republican Presidents. If a ruling at the Supreme Court ends in a tie, the lower court’s ruling stands. The President eliminated the probability of this happening by not taking the travel ban to the the Supreme Court until the opening was filled.

If the liberal judges’ position has any merit and the law and legal responsibility of the President to set immigration policies is trumped by their interpretation of things reportedly said or actions taken by the President before or after being President, then why would the liberal judges not take into consideration the President’s meeting with 50 Muslim leaders last week who together with the President stood up against terrorism? Can the court take some prior actions into consideration and not all in basing their ruling on what the law states? If they could take into consideration their interpretation of a President’s prior positions or statements to interpret the immigration law then wouldn’t they have to take all actions into account and wouldn’t the actions last week trump all prior actions?

The liberal judges in the US Courts should be impeached for such one sided, far left rulings, that don’t take the law into consideration but rather are based on their feelings and radical beliefs.

Was Vanity Fair Article in January 2016 a Warning to Seth Rich that His Life was in Danger?

There is already enough evidence in the Seth Rich murder case to warrant a special government investigation. Now this –

T. A. Frank is a relatively unknown liberal nutjob contributor to Vanity Fair magazine until now. He wrote a piece in January of 2016 published in Vanity Fair that appears more than sinister to many following the Seth Rich murder investigation. Frank begins his article as follows:

For the second time in eight years, Hillary Clinton sees the Democratic nomination being pawed by a charming interloper, like a priceless vase grabbed by a panda. She’d prefer to shoot the panda, but that could mean breaking the vase, and onlookers would object. To make matters worse, Bernie Sanders, who leads Clinton in both New Hampshire and Iowa, has produced a new video ad, “America,” a wordless feel-hope montage that is awfully good, good enough that I can’t help feeling both moved by it and resentful that it works on me. Maybe shoot the panda.

The piece is creepy in and of itself because of the weird and sadistic references to shooting a panda. But what really makes the piece creepy is that Seth Rich’s alias on the Internet was panda!

Internet hacker Kim Dot Com confirmed that Seth Rich’s alias on the Internet was panda.

Frank denies a relationship to the Seth Rich murder in a tweet he released labeling his homicidal writing about Hillary shooting a panda humorous.

Folks, not sure how this became a thing, but I was using the panda as a humorous analogy. It’s coincidence. https://twitter.com/EvilHillaryPics/status/867494319053094912 …

Frank’s piece was disturbing in the first place in writing about shooting a panda. Knowing that Seth Rich used ‘panda’ as his alias makes this piece even more than hair-raising, it’s sinister.

We already know that the WikiLeaks emails proved that the Clinton campaign was in cahoots with the media. At least 65 MSM reporters were meeting with and/or coordinating offline with top Hillary advisers.

Did Frank have a closer relationship with shady John Podesta and the Hillary campaign than the rest of the media? Is this just another piece in the murder case of former DNC staffer Seth Rich that the DNC, Podesta and the Mainstream Media is trying to cover up?

Hopefully we’ll know all the answers to the Seth Rich murder case sooner rather than later.

Kim Dotcom to Send Request to Special Investigator Mueller to Examine the Origin of DNC Leaks in the Russia Probe!

Entrepreneur and self described Internet ‘Freedom Fighter’ Kim Dotcom announced overnight that he is planning to write a letter to Russia Investigation Special Investigator Mueller on Monday to encourage him to include the origin of the DNC leaks in order to properly conclude on the Russia probe.

Kim Dotcom tweeted overnight:

On Monday I’ll release our letter to Special Counsel Robert Mueller. He needs to look into the origin of DNC leaks to conclude Russia probe

 

Kim Dot.Com dropped a bomb earlier this week when he claimed to have evidence that former DNC worker Seth Rich was involved in the leaked emails released by WikiLeaks.

Kim Dot.Com: “I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK.”

He admitted on Saturday that he was part of an operation along with Seth Rich to get stolen DNC emails to Wikileaks.

It wasn’t the Russians.

On Tuesday Kim Dotcom made a major announcement and shared that he was willing to come to the US and give testimony if it is required.
Via Kim.com:

I KNOW THAT SETCH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK.

I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

“He wanted to change that from the inside.”
I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.

I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.

STATEMENT FROM
KIM DOTCOM

UPDATE: Kim DotCom posted this tweet after releasing his earlier statement.
“Seth Rich Was a Hero”

Why Are the DNC and John Podesta Doing All They Can to Silence Seth Rich’s Unsolved Murder?

Mainstream Media (MSM) is pushing invalidated, unsubstantiated and crazy conspiratorial stories about President Trump colluding with Russia to win last year’s election but won’t touch the story about former DNC staffer Seth Rich being gunned down in Washington last year.

Democrats and the MSM continue to push the false tale that Trump worked with Russia to steal the 2016 Presidential election. This lie is being promoted on all MSM outlets as a matter of fact even though there is no evidence to support the accusation. Democrats and the MSM have argued that Trump somehow supplied DNC emails to WikiLeaks that impacted the election and gave the victory to Trump. This is of course is false on many levels. For example, DNC emails were released by WikiLeaks before the election but for the most part the MSM ignored them. Also, the emails did contain information that showed unethical, if not criminal, actions by John Podesta and Hillary Clinton before the campaign, but there is no information to date that proves that the emails released were in any way false or made up.

Hillary Clinton’s creepy former Campaign Manager John Podesta has a history of seedy and alleged illegal activity. The late Andrew Breitbart, entrepreneur and creator of Breitbart.com knew this back in 2012 (warning on language):

Breitbart was ahead of his time.

The WikiLeaks emails showed that the Clinton campaign was in cahoots with the MSM. At least 65 MSM reporters were meeting with and/or coordinating offline with top Hillary advisors. The emails also showed that as early as December 2015 Podesta discussed Trump’s “bromance with Putin” and the potential for using it as a means to slander Trump.

Again in April 2016, Podesta was busy conjuring up a Russia smear campaign against then candidate Trump.

The day after Hillary’s loss to President Trump, it is reported that Podesta and the Clinton campaign put the Trump/Russia smear campaign into full swing. Podesta and Clinton led this smear campaign in spite of having multiple connections with Russia themselves.

Hillary, through the Clinton Foundation, received millions from Russia in return for providing a large percentage of US uranium to Russia while Secretary of State under President Obama. As for Podesta, his own emails released by WikiLeaks show that he received 75,000 shares in a Russia President Vladimir Putin connected energy company and then in an apparent move to cover this up, gave the shares to his daughter.

President Trump even tweeted about the Clinton – Podesta connections to Russia, asking why the MSM doesn’t cover these seedy links.

Many others have tweeted the same:

Knowing that Podesta is involved with the Russia/Trump fallacy, it is clear that it must be full of lies. What also is clear is that Podesta, Clinton, the Democrats and their MSM are doing all they can to push these lies. Also, there’s probably a good chance that a number of the ‘leaks’ in the press are just out right lies created by someone like John Podesta too.

The reason why the Democrats are doing this is not only because the Democrats want to smear Trump and his legacy. The more plausible reason is that the Democrats all know that once the President’s team starts investigating the Clinton Foundation, Obama’s illegal wire tapping and all the many other Democrat scandals and illegal acts, many of them are facing jail time. But there seems to be an even more determined push to stop the MSM from reporting on Seth Rich’s murder.

Seth Rich provided DNC emails to WikiLeaks shortly before his death and today Kim Dot Com dropped a bombshell and revealed that he has proof that Seth Rich provided the emails to WikiLeaks. This evidence alone dismantles the Trump-Russia narrative. If Seth Rich provided DNC emails to WikiLeaks, is this why he was murdered?

Efforts to investigate the Seth Rich murder case have been opposed. A detective investigating the Seth Rich murder case, Rod Wheeler, was contacted by former DNC Chair and CNN pundit Donna Brazile and confronted and asked why he was working on the Seth Rich case. TV and radio personality Sean Hannity has reported on the Seth Rich murder case and this reportedly scares the hell out of top DNC and Hillary lackeys. If you google Sean Hannity and Seth Rich you will see a concerted effort by the MSM to paint the Seth Rich murder story as reported by Sean Hannity as a conspiracy story.

Why does the fact that Seth Rich was murdered by two men in cold blood, shot in the back in a peaceful Washington DC neighborhood early in the morning last year, the young man who provided WikiLeaks the DNC emails that so clearly showed the corruption within the DNC and the Hillary camp, so deeply scare Podesta and the leadership within the DNC?

Perhaps one clue is the email that Podesta wrote last year as released by WikiLeaks where he says he “would love an example being made” [of a leaker].


Over the weekend it was reported that John Podesta went on a bloody rampage in a recent interview about the election. In the interview he clearly projects himself onto President Trump:

Donald Trump is “unfit for office,” a president whose actions are often “absolutely crazy” and whose White House has “a complete disregard for the truth.”

A cursory review of Podesta’s emails released by WikiLeaks would show how seedy and dishonest Podesta is. But he seems more unhinged than ever before. Is this because the Seth Rich story has recently made the headlines and is a tale whose truth is yet to be told?

According to a tweet by @Boca Vista on Twitter, the DNC are now even using bots pushing a CNN story to attack Sean Hannity about the Seth Rich Story. The bots in this story are system generated tweets that are created to make it look like a number of individuals are sending tweets but in reality only one person or entity is sending many tweets.

Ultimately, Seth Rich was just a number to Podesta and the DNC. Podesta and the DNC showed their true colors when after his untimely death, rather than offer a reward for information related to his murder, they named a bike rack after him.

We need to ask and find out where was John Podesta last year when Seth Rich was murdered? Where was Podesta’s brother? Also, is there any connection between the Podesta brother’s and the Seth Rich murder? We know two men murdered Seth Rich and were caught on camera doing it. Where is this video? Why is John Podesta so interested in getting this story out of the hands of the Democrat MSM complex? Is this one of the reasons why the fake Trump – Russia story was created in the first place, to damage the President’s relationship with the American people so that when the facts started coming out about Seth Rich’s murder and Obama’s illegal spying on Americans, these stories would be discarded by the public? Finally, how could the DNC ever allow someone to be so high up in their party or is this a prerequisite to being a top Democrat?

We can only hope answers to questions like these are forthcoming in the upcoming weeks and months.

Comey Cancels Wednesday Hearing with House So He Can Talk to FBI Predecessor Mueller Who’s Now Head of Russia Investigation

Former FBI Director James Comey who was fired by President Donald Trump earlier this month apparently has asked to postpone his scheduled meeting Wednesday with Congress so he can first speak with Special Counsel.

NeverTrumper Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz, Chairman of the Oversight & Government Reform Committee, tweeted out yesterday:

Spoke with Comey. He wants to speak with Special Counsel prior to public testimony. Hearing Wed postponed. @GOPoversight”

 

Politico reported this story yesterday but apparently changed their headline because DrudgeReport.com’s link to the story no longer works:

Drudge Report noted “Comey testimony postponed so he can meet with Mueller”.

Former FBI Head and Comey’s predecessor at the FBI, Robert Mueller, is now the appointed Russia Investigation Special Council. The question arises why Comey would want to speak with Mueller before Congress?

Comey is now famous for having investigated and refused to press charges against Bill and Hillary Clinton at least four different times in his career in Washington, DC while his family appears to have benefitted nicely. Meuller is now famous for having delivered highly enriched uranium to Russia during his career as Head of the FBI and also is known for caving to the demands of Muslim groups during this same time span.

Now we are supposed to expect that these two fair minded individuals are going to meet within the next week before Comey speaks to Congress and this is all ok? Do you think that Comey will have the conversation recorded or will it be like the discussion Comey had with Hillary Clinton last year in regards to her criminal acts while as Secretary of State and not record the discussion?

Apparently far left Politico thinks its a big deal because they changed their reporting so not to highlight this meeting.