Last night 60 Minutes attacked President Trump and the Gateway Pundit and claimed Crowdstrike was right in assessing that the DNC was hacked by Russians in 2016. However, 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike are dead wrong AND WE HAVE PROOF AND THEY DON’T.
We’ve known for a long time that the FBI and Mueller investigation’s claims that Russia hacked the DNC were dead wrong. We also know that this is central to the Russia – Collusion fraud committed against President Trump and the American people starting in 2016 till this day. More and more evidence shows the Russia collusion scam is the biggest lie pushed on the American people as part of the biggest political crime in US history.
60 Minutes Yesterday
Last night 60 Minutes had a report authored by Scott Pelley, regarding Crowdstrike’s claims that Russia hacked the DNC. In their piece they insinuated that the Gateway pundit (TGP) pushes conspiracy theories. This was twisted considering the topic of the 60 minutes ‘fake news’ piece. 60 Minutes insinuated that TGP had a post in 2017 that was conspiratorial, but our post shared a chart presented by WikiLeaks:
Of course 60 Minutes cannot point to any conspiracy with our post linked to above.
60 Minutes went on to push the discredited Trump – Russia fraud conspiracy. By pushing this fairy tale, 60 Minutes along with the rest of the Mainstream Media (MSM), have no credibility left.
The report, however, is the first report that we are aware of where the MSM actually addresses the fact that the favor President Trump asked of the Ukraine in a recent call was related to Crowdstrike. President Trump only discussed the Bidens after on his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky after they were brought up by the Ukrainian President, although 60 Minutes says “Mr. Trump asked for [Crowdstrike] even before his request that Ukraine also investigate the son of Vice President Biden.”
Clearly if you read the call transcript you can see that the President’s request was regarding Crowdstrike and the Bidens only came up after their corrupt actions were noted by the Ukrainian leader.
Pelley, from 60 Minutes, uses former Ambassador Bill Taylor, from the unconstitutional impeachment fraud, as his expert witness on the Ukraine who claims he knows of no connection between Crowdstrike and the Ukraine.
Pelley then shared the following in his report [emphasis added]:
Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didn’t physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers.
“If there is a server or a computer system of any kind that’s involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of what’s on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,” Johnston said.
“As far as you know, the FBI got what it needed and what it wanted?” Pelley asked Johnston.
“Exactly and evidence of that is you don’t hear the FBI complaining,” Johnston said.
He’s right. A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrike’s investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was “acceptable,” in fact even typical in FBI investigations.
How pathetic is 60 Minutes in supporting this Crowdstrike hoax?
Pinchuk serves on the International Advisory Board of a Washington-based think tank called the Atlantic Council. This group is “connected to Ukrainian interests through its “Ukraine in Europe Initiative,” which is designed to galvanize international support for an independent Ukraine within secure borders whose people will determine their own future.” Also serving on the International Advisory Board of the Atlantic Council is James Clapper, who served as Obama’s Director of National Intelligence. Funnily enough, Bongino discovered that the Chief Technology Officer of “the only company that investigated the hacking of the DNC’s servers and quickly determined it was the Russians, is a nonresident senior fellow in cybersecurity” at the Atlantic Council. His name is Dmitri Alperovitch (owner of CrowdStrike).”
Google Capital, the two-year-old growth equity arm of search giant Google (GOOG), announced its first security investment on Monday morning.
The fund has pumped $100 million into cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike. It was joined by cloud computing company Rackspace (RAX), which is a customer, and the firm’s existing investors Accel and Warburg Pincus. The new infusion represents a Series C round for the Irvine, Calif.-based company, bringing its total funding raised to date to $156 million.
Holes in Crowdstike’s Claims – Support that Emails Weren’t Hacked
There are many holes with the ‘Russia hacked the DNC emails’ claim, much of what has already been posted here at TGP.
Some individuals have shared that they have sources who claim that the DNC servers were never examined by Crowdstrike:
After speaking w/ my @FBI sources & a @nytimes reporter with direct knowledge of the handling of the @DNC server it's true – there was no direct examination or physically custody of the DNC server – an "image" (i.e. copy) of the server was examined only: https://t.co/yDJKCYmUQC
It was also uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it that the Russians hacked the DNC servers and never received unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports:
The DNC's lawyer provided the Crowdstrike reports to the Govt. He said the redacted parts weren't relevant to the investigation.
(Binney is brilliant. See the documentary on Binney entitled: “A Good American” – it will astound you.)
Binney has proof for his assertion but Crowdstrike and the DNC to date have provided no support that it was Russia who hacked the DNC. Binney also claims that the Mueller gang wouldn’t even look at his data because they knew it would show something different than what they presented in their final bogus report (i.e. Mueller’s dossier as referred to by Devin Nunes).
TGP friend and cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:
If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we don’t even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This type of data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack.
Crowd Strike was completely wrong (most likely intentionally) about the Russian hack of the Ukrainian Artillery allegation. And we know for a fact that they used the same forensic techniques to reach that conclusion as they did on the DNC hack.
Apelbaum posted a report in January 2019, with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians. Apelbaum’s first argument is this –
According to the WaPo (using CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs. This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees’ computer.
This is pretty detailed information, but if this was the case, then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘details’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers? And since when does the DOJ, an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay and 3rd parties like the British national Matt Tait (a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution?
The fact that the three had multiple concurrent high impact and high visibility project assignments is odd because this is not how typical offensive cyber intelligence teams operate. These units tend to be compartmentalized, they are assigned to a specific mission, and the taskforce stays together for the entire duration of the project.
Next Apelbaum questions the Mueller gang’s assertion that the ‘hacker’ named Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian –
Any evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian should be evaluated while keeping these points in mind:
He used a Russian VPN service to cloak his IP address, but did not use TOR. Using a proxy to conduct cyber operations is a SOP [Standard Operating Procedure] in all intelligence and LEA [Law Enforcement Agency] agencies. [i.e. Russia would have masked their VPN service]
He used the AOL email service that captured and forwarded his IP address and the same AOL email to contact various media outlets on the same day of the attack. This is so overt and amateurish that its unlikely to be a mistake and seems like a deliberate attempt to leave traceable breadcrumbs.
He named his Office User account Феликс Эдмундович (Felix Dzerzhinsky), after the founder of the Soviet Secret Police. Devices and accounts used in offensive cyberspace operations use random names to prevent tractability and identification. Why would anyone in the GRU use this pseudonym (beside the obvious reason) is beyond comprehension.
He copied the original Trump opposition research document and pasted it into a new .dotm template (with an editing time of about 2 minutes). This resulted in a change of the “Last Modified by” field from “Warren Flood” to “Феликс Эдмундович” and the creation of additional Russian metadata in the document. Why waste the time and effort doing this?
About 4 hours after creating the ‘Russian’ version of the document, he exported it to a PDF using LibreOffice 4.2 (in the process he lost/removed about 20 of the original pages). This was most likely done to show additional ‘Russian fingerprints’ in the form of broken hyperlink error messages in Russian (Images 4 and 5). Why bother with re-formatting and converting the source documents? Why not just get the raw data out in the original format ASAP?
Apelbaum next discusses Guccifer 2.0 –
In June 21, 2016, Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai from Vice Motherboard interviewed a person who identified himself as “Guccifer 2.0”. During their on-line chat session, the individual claimed that he was Romanian (see transcript of the interview below). His poor Romanian language skills were later used to unmask his Russian identify.
…I’m not a scientific linguist nor do I even know where to find one if my life depended on it, but I’m certain that you can’t reliably determine nationality based on someone impersonating another language or from the use of fake metadata in files. This elaborate theory also has the obvious flaw of assuming that the Russian intelligence services are dumb enough to show up to an interview posing as Romanians without actually being able to read and write flaunt Romanian.
After providing a couple more examples of why the Russian story doesn’t stick, Apelbaum closes with this –
The bottom line is that if we want to go beyond the speculative trivia, the pseudo science, and the bombastic unverified claims, we have to ask the real tough questions, mainly: is Guccifer 2.0 even the real attacker and how did he circumvent all of the logs during several weeks of repeated visits while downloading close to 2 GB of data?
Finally, we know that WikiLeaks has stated numerous times that Russia did not provide them with the emails they leaked in 2016 and Julian Assange has stated that WikiLeaks had nothing to do with Russia.
But of course the Mueller gang never interviewed WikiLeaks in an effort to determine how they received the Clinton emails. Of course the Mueller team could not risk WikiLeaks saying the emails were not received from Russia which would destroy their Russia hacked the DNC fairy tale.
60 Minutes destroyed any credibility it may have had left by aligning itself with Crowdstrike and the Democrats. The FBI, the Mueller gang and the Democrat’s decisions to accept and promote Crowdstrike’s bogus ‘Russia hacked the DNC’ fairy tale were a huge mistake.
One week after the corrupt Mueller investigation was put in place, the Deep State leadership in the DOJ mysteriously disappeared for more than half a week. Where did these crooks go, who was there, and what were the doing?
The Mueller investigation was based on a fraud and the FBI and Deep State knew Trump – Russia collusion was a fraud in January 2017, before President Trump’s Inauguration.
The IG report conclusively found that U.S. intelligence officials had determined by January of 2017–when Buzzfeed published its article–that the Steele dossier was false and that Steele's own primary sub-source for it said it was nonsense: "corroboration was 'zero.'" pic.twitter.com/315qXklDaP
We therefore also know without a doubt based on evidence in the recent report on the Carter Page FISA warrant application and renewals, that the Mueller investigation was based on a lie the day it was set up and the Deep State individuals who set up the sham had to all know it as well.
The Mueller investigation was set up on May 17, 2017 by the Deep State holdovers from Obama’s (corrupt and criminal) DOJ and FBI. After disgraced former FBI Director James Comey was fired, the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, created the fraudulent investigation. This horrible and corrupt investigation went on for the better part of two years and resulted in anyone close to the President, including his family, personal friends and lawyers, being subpoenaed and testifying in front of the courts or Congress.
No one in the coup to date has been brought to justice in spite of numerous crimes and an overall seditious effort to overthrow the US government.
There is enough evidence in the public arena to warrant indictments of Deep State players in the Mueller investigation. However, there are many unanswered questions that remain. One observation is as follows:
On May 24, 2017, only a few days after the inception of the Mueller investigation, a number of the corrupt players in the investigation disappeared for the better part of a week.
As everyone knows who has followed this story, corrupt FBI actors Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text each other during the Hillary Clinton sham investigation into her emails and through the end of their time as part of the Mueller investigation. Many of these texts were found. However, there appears to be no texts between the Deep State lovers when either was on a business trip. This occurs throughout the period that their texts were recorded.
On interesting find related to this scenario is that no texts are located between the two lovers from May 24, 2017 through May 29, 2017. This was only one week after the Mueller investigation originated.
The next text between the two lovers is not until the following Monday, May 29, 2017. In the mean time there were no texts between the two on May 25, 26, 27 and 28. On the 29th, Page began working for the Mueller Special Counsel, and Strzok texted Page: “NYTimes: A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?”.
(It’s simply appalling and grotesque to see these texts in light of what we now know – that the entire collusion sham and Mueller investigation was based on lies and all the participants in the sham knew it.)
Strzok and Page may not have text each other because they were both together at this time, but we don’t know.
What is shocking is that per a review of DAG Rod Rosenstein’s calendar and FBI Andrew McCabe’s calendar, they have no appointments, and appear out of the office as well.
There are a number of people who have done research on this period of time and no one has identified activities by these Deep State players during these few days in May 2017.
Where did they go, who was there, what was discussed, and how many crimes were committed, all on the US taxpayer dime – OUTRAGEOUS!
Any Deep State players who participated in the Mueller Special Counsel and other recent sham investigations should be removed from the premises of the FBI and DOJ and then indicted for their seditious crimes.
Another report coming from the Epoch Times indicates the numbers of deaths in Wuhan from the coronavirus are way low. President Xi’s actions were too late and as a result the political and economic repercussions are devastating:
In Hong Kong Disneyland has been closed for weeks now. Yesterday it was announced that the amusement park hotels will be used for lodging individuals with the coronavirus should it become necessary in Hong Kong. Schools in Hong Kong and most of China are closed till mid-March.
The Wuhan coronavirus is now considered a pandemic.
The coronavirus is killing people and commerce in China. Mixed messaging from China’s leaders leads to more questions and less belief in information from the government related to the virus.
Today in Hong Kong the schools announced that they will remain closed from the end of March through mid-March as a result of the coronavirus. Civil servants in Hong Kong are asked to stay home another week as well. Most companies in Hong Kong are following the governement’s recommendation to civil servants.
The airlines in Hong Kong are another indication of the impact the virus is having on Hong Kong, let alone China. The Hong Kong Immigration Department releases daily passenger arrivals and departures at the Hong Kong airport, one of the top ranked airports in the world:
The number of arrivals and departures has decreased between January 24th and February 12th astronomically, from 127,000 and 257,000 to 3,000 and 4,000, respectively. The world class Hong Kong airport, for all intensive purposes, is shut down. Since Saturday, any mainland arrivals must remain quarantined for 14 days per new actions taken in Hong Kong.
John Hopkins in the US maintains a site that counts cases by location and the numbers are increasing with over 60,000 now infected with the virus (see picture above). In addition the site shows that nearly 1,400 people have died and around 6,000 are recovered. This apparently doesn’t mean that nearly one in five infected with the virus dies because reports are that the virus is less fatal than SARS.
What is frustrating is that the China government will not allow the CDC into China to identify the cause of the coronavirus or where it first started. Breitbart reported in late January:
U.S. health officials said that they have been offering for weeks to send experts to help China combat the coronavirus that has claimed at least 106 lives.
At press conference Tuesday, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said the U.S. first offered to send experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on January 6 but China has not yet accepted the offer.
“CDC experts are standing by, ready willing and able to go immediately to China, either on a bilateral basis or under the auspices of the World Health Organization,” Azar said. “This is a major public health issue and we basically just need the best public health people we have in the world working on this.”
U.S. personnel could aid China in answering critical public health questions about how the virus spreads, its incubation period, and if it can be spread by those not yet showing symptoms, CDC Director Robert Redfield said.
Because China won’t let the CDC in to determine the cause of the virus and other information to aid recovery, many suspect wrong doing. One tweet identified the burning of organic matters outside Wuhan. It’s not sure what this organic matter is:
Data from https://t.co/oDMad8pquE shows a massive release of sulfur dioxide gas from the outskirts of Wuhan, commonly associated with the burning of organic matters. Levels are elevated, even compared with the rest of China. pic.twitter.com/XgBfJd7dDS
China too is apparently upset with the way the coronavirus has been managed announcing changes today:
China’s Communist Party has replaced the party heads in the coronavirus stricken province of Hubei and its capital Wuhan, state media said on Thursday, reporting the most high profile officials to be dismissed in the wake of the epidemic.
The removal of Jiang Chaoliang, the leading Communist Party official of Hubei province, and Ma Guoqiang, his counterpart in Wuhan, follows the dismissal of two provincial health officials on Tuesday, and is part of a wider effort by Beijing to remove bureaucrats it accuses of shirking their duties.
The central government has set up a special cabinet task force under Premier Li Keqiang to handle the crisis, and the new appointments in Hubei suggest that China’s senior leaders are taking greater control.
Shanghai mayor Ying Yong has been appointed as the new secretary of the Hubei Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, replacing Jiang, the official Xinhua news agency said without explaining why Jiang was removed.
Now rumors coming out of China are that the Ying Yong knew he was being assigned to Hubei province because he sent doctors from Shanghai to Hubei recently, knowing they are needed.
Due to the lack of transparency and delay in reporting, the whole world is anxious wondering what is really going on. The coronavirus in China, Hong Kong and now the world is causing deaths and massive anxiety.
After getting caught lying to the Courts and claiming there were no documents related to Seth Rich, emails between FBI Deep State lovers Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were uncovered with the title “Seth Rich”.
Next the FBI claimed the Strzok-Page emails were redacted to protect the investigation they claim never happened.
Now the Deep State DOJ is bringing in the US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York to argue against an evidentiary hearing on the matter.
We reported two weeks ago how Attorney Ty Clevenger reported to the courts that despite numerous assurances from the FBI that they had no information related to Seth Rich, the FBI had been caught after emails related to Seth Rich were identified and provided to Judicial Watch. It looked like the FBI was lying to him all this time. (See timeline below).
In response, the DOJ immediately stepped in with a letter to the judge. In this letter the DOJ claimed the FBI had met its burden and its search would have located emails “of investigative significance”:
The DOJ next said that after the Mueller sham, Hillary’s email exoneration, the Ukraine Hoax, Fast and Furious, FISA Warrant abuse and much more, the FBI is “entitled to a presumption of good faith”:
The DOJ then said that the FBI was not investigating Seth Rich’s death and it has said so and there is no related case:
The DOJ then said that the FBI never said it had searched everyone’s emails and claims it didn’t identify the emails it later released because they were not “substantive” emails:
We next reported a week ago that Clevenger filed a motion for an evidentiary hearing as a result of the government’s response:
In his response, Clevenger showed that the FBI argued that they redacted the emails related to Seth Rich recently found and sent to Judicial Watch because they don’t want to disclose investigative or prosecutorial activities. However, Clevenger argued that since the FBI claimed that there was no investigation or prosecution related to Seth Rich – how can they redact for this reason when they claim there was no investigation?
Another material point that Clevenger made in his response was that the emails that were found were between FBI ‘fraudsters’ Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. He said that these two have shown how they will lie and cheat to cover up their misconduct (they are the adulterous Bonnie and Clyde of the FBI for Pete’s sake):
Clevenger was on OAN discussing his situation this past week:
The DOJ responded yesterday to Clevenger’s request:
This response came from the US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Richard Donoghue.
Clevenger addressed his complaint to Donoghue but it is surprising that Donoghue responded directly to Clevenger’s complaint and request. However, it is not surprising that Donoghue claims no wrong doing in efforts to obtain internal information related to Seth Rich by the DOJ and FBI:
Donoghue’s response notes that Clevenger has been requesting this information since September 1, 2017 – over two years ago. The DOJ and FBI argue that because they replied (omitting that they stated they had no information) that Clevenger’s request for an evidentiary hearing should be ignored. The DOJ also argues that Mr. Hardy who was the individual who failed to provide information to Clevenger should not be questioned:
The problem is no one in their right mind would trust the FBI and DOJ at this time in our history – not after the Ukraine hoax and FISA abuse scandal. The FBI has been denying any information to Clevenger for more than two years and then redacts the information provided to Judicial Watch while never notifying Clevenger of the located emails on Seth Rich. OUTRAGEOUS!
Texas businessman Ed Butowsky filed a lawsuit where he outed reporter Ellen Ratner as his source for information on Seth Rich. The DNC operative [Rich] was murdered in the summer of 2016 in Washington DC. His murder was never solved. According to Butowsky’s lawsuit, Seth Rich provided WikiLeaks the DNC emails before the 2016 election, not Russia.
This totally destroys the FBI and Mueller’s claims that Russians hacked the DNC to obtain these emails.
Butowsky claims in his lawsuit:
Ms. Rattner said Mr. Assange told her that Seth Rich and his brother, Aaron, were responsible for releasing the DNC emails to Wikileaks. Ms. Rattner said Mr. Assange wanted the information relayed to Seth’s parents, as it might explain the motive for Seth’s murder.
On November 9, 2016 Ellen Ratner admitted publicly that she met with Julian Assange for three hours the Saturday before the 2016 election. According to Ratner, Julian Assange told her the leaks were not from the Russians, they were from an internal source from the Hillary Campaign.
According to the duo, they obtained the transcript from former FBI Chief of Staff James Rybicki where he states that the Obama White House was the entity that was pushing the Russia conspiracy as early as October 2016 –
Rybicki was corrupt cop James Comey’s Chief of staff –
Newly released documents from the FBI suggest that the Obama White House pushed intelligence agencies to publicly blame the Russians for email leaks from the Democratic National Committee to Wikileaks.
This afternoon I received an undated (and heavily redacted) transcript of an interview of James Rybicki, former chief of staff to former FBI Director James Comey, that includes this excerpt: “So we understand that at some point in October of 2016, there was, I guess, a desire by the White House to make some kind of statement about Russia’s…” and then the next page is omitted.
Roger Stone’s Indictment
Trump friend Roger Stone was indicted after being charged by the Mueller gang based on this key question – who provided the DNC and Podesta emails to WikiLeaks?
The corrupt FBI and Mueller team claim the emails were hacked but neither entity inspected the DNC server which was supposedly hacked.
Bill Binney, is more than an expert, he is “A Good American”. Binney developed a system for the NSA that would have identified the 9-11 terrorist attack before it occurred, but the NSA shut down his project. This is all documented in the documentary “A Good American”. We encourage you to watch this video about Binney’s work with the NSA and their subsequent follow up after 9-11 below –
We also reported:
When Ty Clevenger requested documents from the FBI related to any investigation into the death of Seth Rich, they replied that they never investigated Seth Rich and they don’t have any records on him –
But when documents were requested from the NSA, they replied that they won’t release their records regarding Seth Rich because it’s a matter of national security –
USC 552(b)(1) states: This section does not apply to matters that are—
(A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order;
Attorney Ty Clevenger requested documents again from the FBI related to any communications related to the death of Seth Rich:
Clevenger claimed that the FBI did not perform its search in good faith after first declaring that they did not have to perform the search. Clevenger also claims that his client, Ed Butowsky, has information that the Seth Rich’s devices were inspected and he wants the results of those investigations –
Clevenger wants the FBI to continue their search and not cover things up because their first review for documents related to Seth Rich was inadequate.
Next we reported on October 10, 2019 ==>>
Clevenger requested that the US Department of Justice provide him documents he is requesting based on some new information and Clevenger also asked the court to allow him to compel the FBI to produce Mr. Hardy (the individual at the FBI who has not provided documents requested) and the chief of CART as witnesses at an evidentiary hearing –
Clevenger made his request based on some new information that he obtained related to actions the FBI took related to Seth Rich. According to Michael Isikoff who is formerly with Newsweek and now with Yahoo (yes, the same individual involved in the Russia collusion hoax) the FBI had numerous activities related to Seth Rich. On page two of Clevenger’s motion, Clevenger notes the following discussion that can be heard on Isikoff’s podcast –
So according to Deep State hack Isikoff –
1 The FBI had been contacted by the DOJ about Seth Rich 2 The FBI had been examining Seth Rich’s computer 3 The FBI was looking into Seth Rich’s gmail account 4 The FBI investigated an attempt to hack into Seth Rich’s computer 5 And, finally, confirmed liar Andrew McCabe from the FBI said there was nothing to the stories regarding Seth Rich!
Next on October 17, 2019, we reported the following ==>>
Ty Clevenger reported that he received a response from the FBI and they basically said that the DOJ was lying. Clevenger writes –
Now, back to today’s events. In the response filed this afternoon, the FBI attacked the statements of Mr. Isikoff and Ms. Hines as “unsworn” and “hearsay,” and insisted that it did not need to conduct any more searches for records about Mr. Rich. Mind you, I’m just asking the FBI to pick up the phone and call its Computer Analysis Response Team (“CART”) and ask whether CART has any records about Seth Rich. The FBI refuses to do that, even though it has twice called the Washington Field Office (“WFO”) to ask whether WFO had any records about Mr. Rich.
According to the FBI, any CART records would have shown up in the index search of the FBI’s Central Records System (“CRS”). As I explained in a September 17, 2019 motion, however, the FBI had already admitted that not everything gets entered in the CRS. And now we’ve got the former prosecutor who was assigned to Seth Rich’s case admitting that the FBI investigated his electronic devices… yet the FBI refuses to search for records in CART, the place where such records would most likely be found. Suspicious, no?
Clevenger requested a meeting with the FBI but he was out of luck. The FBI’s denials stuck. It looked like the FBI was trying to hide something and either the FBI or the DOJ are a bunch of liars, or maybe both?
On Monday, January 27, 2020, we had a stunning update ==>>
After previously claiming no FBI records could be found related to Seth Rich, emails were uncovered. These emails weren’t just from anybody. These emails were between FBI lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the two most corrupt individuals involved in the Russia Collusion Hoax.
In a set of emails released by Judicial Watch on January 22, 2020, provided by a FOIA request on Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, multiple emails were found referring to Seth Rich:
The emails are heavily redacted but we do know that Jonathan Moffa was also involved in the email exchange:
What’s also unreal is that the individual releasing the emails to Judicial Watch, David M. Hardy, is also the Deep State crook who claimed he couldn’t find any emails related to Seth Rich to Ty Clevenger. Per Clevenger, he was never contacted by Hardy or the FBI to notify him that Seth Rich emails have been found.
Clevenger prepared an email and notified the court and provided the following complaint to US Attorney Durham, US Attorney Donoghue and DOJ Inspector General Horowitz:
The initial response to the query from the Public Affairs Office of the Washington Field Office is telling. The Agent could have responded very simply–The FBI was not involved in any facet of the Seth Rich investigation. This was a local matter handled by the DC Police.
But that is not how the Agent responded. And then he took the step of adding in people at FBI Headquarters. How do we know this? The message from the Washington Field Office at 7:09 pm was sent to the Criminal Division to Agents Moffat and Strzok.
Ty Clevenger now has ample ammunition to return to court and insist that the FBI be required to identify all agents involved in these email chains and to discuss what they knew about the Seth Rich case. David Hardy declared under the penalty of perjury that there were no such emails. I doubt that the two judges involved in the relevant cases on this matter will be happy to learn that the FBI stonewalled a valid FOIA request.
Christopher Wray’s FBI is still corrupt and dishonest and no effort has been made to clean house. There is likely no reason for the redactions in the emails to Judicial Watch as well.
The FBI continues to lie and cover up its criminal deeds. Director Wray is doing nothing to clean house. He is part of the problem. The Deep State must go. Americans demand the truth!
Luntz hasn’t been the same since. He absolutely and somewhat silently, abhors President Trump and will do almost anything to disparage our President. Yesterday was no exception as Luntz insinuated in a tweet that President Obama’s jobs numbers were better than President Trumps, this is just not true:
During Trump’s first 36 months in office, the U.S. economy has gained 6.6 million jobs.
But during a comparable 36-month period at the end of Obama’s tenure, employers added 8.1 million jobs.https://t.co/peajQqkjA2
Luntz based his tweet on a post where some liberal took the number of new jobs for President Obama for his best three years out of eight (his last three years) and compares these numbers to President Trump’s first three years in office.
But this is very misleading in many ways.
Overall, Obama lost nearly (2 million) jobs in his first three years in office when compared to President Trump who has gained nearly 7 million jobs. (See numbers from BLS below).
President Trump has gained nearly 9 million more jobs than Obama did in their first three years in office!
But the US lost an additional (3.5 million) jobs in 2008. Obama didn’t gain all the lost jobs back from 2008 and 2009 until his sixth year in office.
Also, much can be said of the kinds of jobs that were gained under Obama versus Trump. Many of the job gains in the Obama years were part time servers at restaurants. Many individuals maintained multiple jobs because Obamacare mandated that employees had to pay for worker health insurance if workers accumulated more than 30 hours a week on the job. So employees halted employee overtime and kept hours to under 30 hours a week and individuals had to maintain two jobs to make ends meat.
Not so with President Trump. President Trump has gained a million more manufacturing jobs than Obama in their respective first three years in office. Manufacturing jobs are traditionally much better paying that server jobs at restaurants.
Of course we’ve heard this before (remember Huber?). We’ve also heard Senator Graham say he was going to bring in a whole batch of villians before the Senate Judiciary Committed since before 2018 when he became the Chair of that committee, but he has brought noone in front of his committee.
But another source, the same one who first outed Ciaramella as the whistleblower, Greg Rubini on Twitter, is saying Dirty cops Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe will both be arrested this week, maybe even Monday or Tuesday:
The greatest stock market rally ever in US History continues. Sets new all-time highs again today!
After President Trump was elected the stock markets exploded. The markets are a gauge of the economy and include expectations of the future. On November 8th, 2016, the DOW stood at 18,332. Since that date the DOW has soared. On Thursday the DOW closed at 29,388 or 11,056 points higher than the day of the 2016 election!
The markets are starting 2020 with a bang! Never has has the DOW risen so much in such a short period of time as these three years since the 2016 election. THIS IS HISTORIC!
Not only has the DOW skyrocketed since Donald Trump was elected President, the market’s rise is record breaking.
President Trump’s first year in office (2017) saw the most all-time stock market closing highs (71). The most all-time highs in a year prior to 2017 was 69 in 1995.
Prior to 2016, no year in the DOW’s more than 100-year history ever saw the DOW increase by more than 3,500 points. In 2017 the DOW increased nearly 5,000 points for a record. In 2019 the DOW was up more than 5,000 points (5,210) breaking the 2017 record!
Since President Trump was elected President the DOW tied the record for the most all-time closing highs in a row. In January of 1987 President Reagan saw the DOW increase to new all-time highs a record 12 days in a row. In February of 2017, President Trump matched Reagan’s record.
The DOW reached its fastest 500 point increase between major milestones under President Trump. In January of 2018 the DOW surpassed 26,000 and six days later the DOW surpassed 26,500. Under President Trump the DOW has seen the fastest 1,000; 2,000; 3,000; 4,000; 5,000; 6,000; 7,000, 8,000 and 9,000 point increases in DOW history. No similar records occurred at any time in history.
Also, President Trump didn’t ride an Obama wave, the DOW under Obama was down in 2015 and stayed relatively flat until the 2016 election. The DOW is now officially up more than 60% since the 2016 election.
Presidents GW Bush and Obama NEVER reached a new all-time high in their entire first terms. Presidents (Franklin) Roosevelt, Truman and Carter never reached a new all-time high in their Presidencies.
President Trump has now increased the markets by more than any other President in their entire Presidency.
All the major indices are way up under President Trump and many more records have been set. The market increases since President Trump’s election three years ago truly are historic and record breaking!
A number of individuals have been presented on the Internet and identified as the Deep State ‘whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella. Below we identify some of the individuals misidentified as Ciaramella.
Yaacov Apelbaum put together information regarding the many individuals misidentified as Deep State’s Eric Ciaramella. Below is a list of some of those individuals as well as a picture of the real leaker, Ciaramella.
But in Sperry’s post, he notes the exact pronunciation for Ciaramella’s name – (pronounced char-a-MEL-ah) –
Bongino suspected that Sperry was trying to hint at something as the pronunciation of a name is not usually included in posts like Sperry’s. What Bongino suggested was that there is a connection between Sperry’s article and the Grassley and Johnson letter – Char-a-MEL-ah is the same ‘Charlie’ in the Strzok and Page communications.
This is why Schiff wanted to keep his identity hidden. Not only because Ciaramella is a clearly a leaker and is culpable for crimes due to his leaking but because he was spying on President Trump in the White House and was involved in the Russia collusion scam as well.
As we reported on October 11th, in a hit piece on conservatives in July, 2017, Yahoo reported that Mike Cernovich targeted an individual who worked for former National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster, claiming the individual wanted to ‘sabotage’ President Trump and also claiming he is ‘pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia’.
Cernovich reported in June, 2017, that McMaster promoted Ciaramella in spite of being connected to Susan Rice in Obama’s White House –
West Wing officials confirmed to Cernovich Media that Eric Ciaramella, who worked closely with Susan Rice while at NSC, was recently promoted to be H.R. McMaster’s personal aide. Ciaramella will have unfettered access to McMaster’s conversations with foreign leaders.
Others noted Ciaramella was Obama’s NSC Director for the Ukraine. This connects him and his team at the NSC to Joe Biden. Biden was Obama’s lead in the Ukraine so it’s implausible that Ciararmella and his team were not connected to Biden. Schiff’s leakers are connected to Biden also.
Fool Nelson on Twitter was one of the first to out Ciaramella –
Another Internet sleuth, Greg Rubini, may have been the first to identify Ciaramella. Rubini however noted that Ciaramella was in the White House at an event and was seated directly behind Melania Trump –
1. in the below posts of this [THREAD] you find the List of my main Twitter Threads on Eric Ciaramella, the Adam Schiff "whistleblower", which I exposed since Oct 11.
This turned out to be incorrect as the individual in the picture above with Melania Trump was not Ciaramella. The individual identified as Eric Ciaramella is Hugo Verges, he is French President Emanuel Macron’s advisor for Latin America. This image was taken prior to the state diner on April 24, 2018.
Numerous other individuals were identified as Ciaramella as well. Below are some of those individuals . In the image below, the individual identified as Eric Ciaramella is David Edelman, he was President Obama’s Special Assistant for Economic & Technology Policy in 2014. He was one of the many Obama Administration employees who sneered at President Trump upon his first visit to the White House after beating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
Another person identified as Eric Ciaramella is Alexander Soros. These images below were taken over a period of several years. Alexander is the son of George Soros. The Soros family is closely connected to the Democrat Party.
Another person identified as Eric Ciaramella is Eric Hochberger. He is Adam Schiff’s daughter’s Alexa boyfriend.
Another person identified as Eric Ciaramella is Rostyslav Pavlenko. He is the Head of Situation Analysis Service of the Secretariat of President of Ukraine. Eric Ciaramella and Jennifer Perino did attend this meeting, but opted out of the group photo. The source of this Image is USUF.
If you are looking for a confirmed Eric Ciaramella’s photo, you can find it in the Mechanics of Deception (one of the links), as well as in the image below. All images have been deep fake verified.
It’s against the law to spy on our President in an effort to have him impeached. It’s now time that young Ciaramella face the music for the crimes he perpetrated on the United States.
Senator Mitt Romey, also known as Piere Delecto from his fake Twitter account, is also connected to the Russia collusion hoax.
The infamous Christopher Steele provided a number of small articles, together known as the Steele dossier, to the Deep State to use to obtain the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page and candidate and President Trump. All the known articles produced by Steele were included in the Mueller report. All but one.
We reported in March of 2018 that there was one piece of the dossier that relates to former Republican candidate for President and current Utah Senator, Mitt Romney. The information came from a report in The New Yorker.
According to the March 2018 article in the New Yorker, Christopher Steele has an unpublished memo with claims the Russians told Trump to pass up Mitt Romney as his choice for Secretary of State [emphasis added]:
One subject that Steele is believed to have discussed with Mueller’s investigators is a memo that he wrote in late November, 2016, after his contract with Fusion had ended. This memo, which did not surface publicly with the others, is shorter than the rest, and is based on one source, described as “a senior Russian official.” The official said that he was merely relaying talk circulating in the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but what he’d heard was astonishing: people were saying that the Kremlin had intervened to block Trump’s initial choice for Secretary of State, Mitt Romney. (During Romney’s run for the White House in 2012, he was notably hawkish on Russia, calling it the single greatest threat to the U.S.) The memo said that the Kremlin, through unspecified channels, had asked Trump to appoint someone who would be prepared to lift Ukraine-related sanctions, and who would coöperate on security issues of interest to Russia, such as the conflict in Syria. If what the source heard was true, then a foreign power was exercising pivotal influence over U.S. foreign policy—and an incoming President.
This of course leads to more questions. Steele reportedly claimed under oath that he didn’t produce any more memoranda after October 2016 with none produced in November:
But if you look at the Mueller report (which contains every single other Steele falsehood), there is no mention of Romney.
Regardless whether Mueller found any evidence for this one way or the other, it should be noted in the Mueller report. Why was this one left out?
Was Romney in on it? Is this why Romney attacks President Trump on everything that he does and says?