Internet Research Psychologist: Google Search Results Can Sway US Elections by Millions of Voters by Pushing Fake News for the Left

Dr. Robert Epstein was in front of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution on Tuesday. His analysis of the impact of Google on US elections is frightening.

Dr. Epstein discussed Google’s real threat to democracy. Something we have been saying at the Gateway Pundit for years –

Dr. Epstein is a Democrat yet he shared his observations knowing the impact on the US –

To no one’s surprise Google’s search results were in favor of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election –

Very few people can detect the bias (we certainly can) –

Biased search results can alter the opinion of millions (without Google and the MSM Hillary would have gotten beat 100,000,000 to 0 ) –

On election day 2016 Google helped Hillary obtain up to an estimated 4.6 million more votes –

Google helped Democrats in the 2018 election through biased results as well –

Google likely has determined elections (except 2016) since 2015 –

Google is much more effective than ads –

Google basically determines what you read –

Elections are not free and fair due to Google –

The only way conservatives win is to eliminate voter fraud and have candidates that are so incredible (i.e. Donald Trump) with all the right positions that they cannot lose (no one could have beaten Hillary other than Trump) –

Bets are that most Republican politicians have no idea what is going on. Many are riding the Trump wave and think that they won because of their personal charisma or policies. In reality, many were carried by Trump. To this day however many Republicans don’t support the greatest President in our lifetime who is able to withstand more attacks from more angles than any politician in history. In spite of the Mueller witch hunt, Speakers Ryan and Pelosi, Obama Judges, the highly corrupt FBI, DOJ, State Department and CIA, the Deep State crooks in all government agencies, the horribly biased media and socials, Trump is not just surviving, but he’s thriving.

The issue with Google that Dr. Epstein doesn’t even address is its use of web ads. Google places top paying ads with liberals and low paying ads with conservatives (if any at all). Conservatives are labeled “undesirables” by Google and targeted in their pocket book. Google is getting away with this as well.

Many conservative websites have had to shut down due to loss of traffic from the socials and loss of revenues from Google and Facebook in web ads. It is absolutely a must that this be addressed.

If the far left bias of social behemoths is not addressed, democracy and independence will soon be gone. Bets are that most Americans don’t want Rep. Ilhan Omar determining what they read!

Obama and His Italian Friend Renzi Suspected of Spying on Trump and Using Italian State Secrecy Decree to Cover It Up

The recent firings of top Italian spies were likely related to Obama and a plot to set up candidate and President Trump in their Hillary email scandal. Now there are suspicions that Renzi’s Italians covered up their crimes by labeling them as “State Secrets” which would prevent them from being disclosed.

In May Italian Prime Minister Conte asked for the resignations of four top intelligence officials after his call with President Donald Trump.

After that it was reported that the recent removal of these top Italian intelligence ministers from their positions as top spies in the government had been uncovered.

Our story started in January 2017 when Computer World wrote about alleged crimes committed by Italian Giulio Occhionero:

The Tuesday arrest of Giulio Occhionero and his sister, Francesca Maria, has brought to light what appears to be the biggest, and highest-profile, hacking of institutional and corporate accounts ever reported in Italy.

The siblings have been planting the Pyramid Eye remote access Trojan on computers using a spear-phishing technique over several years, according to the arrest order.

They attacked at least 18,000 high-profile targets, including former Prime Ministers Matteo Renzi and Mario Monti, President of European Central Bank Mario Draghi, as well as employees and heads of various ministries including Internal Affairs, Treasury, Finance and Education.

But Giulio Occhionero claimed that he and his sister, Francesca Maria, were set up. A piece reported by Frederico Punzi, writing in The Atlantico, notes their denials and more:

Occhionero complained to the Prosecutor of the Republic of Perugia and wrote to the U.S. Congress and the FBI. In fact, there are a number of contradictions and suspicious circumstances in the case.

Occhionero provided the letter that he claims he sent US Congress and the FBI:

No Title

Occhionero claims and it’s reported that:

Members of Italian intelligence were approached by Hillary Clinton, the Obama Administration, and the Deep State in order to frame Trump by PLANTING EVIDENCE on American servers to force Trump to step down from office.

In other words, members of Italian intelligence found a target in Occhionero, a Republican-sympathizer who had two servers for his company, Westland Securities, located in America. One was in Washington State, and the other in West Virginia.

The plan was for Italian Intelligence to hack into these servers, plant classified emails from Hillary’s servers inside these servers on American soil, and then alert the FBI.

The FBI would then raid these locations, “discover” these e-mails, investigate, link these servers to Trump…

And then force Trump to resign.

Occhionero believes that Obama and the former leader of Italy, Matteo Renzi, worked together on this plan and he provides reports of their meetings in Italy before the 2016 election and in early 2017.

Why Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi is Dining With Obama

Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi is joining Barack Obama for the last formal dinner of his presidency. Why?

There are now rumors that the Italian government covered up its involvement in spying on candidate Trump’s team and efforts to plant information on Occhionero’s servers by labeling the actions state secrets. Occhionero and his sister have been investigated (and currently are) for Art. 256 of the Italian Criminal Code; which is connected to the act of entering into knowledge/possession of documents covered by “state secrecy classification”.

This is how the Renzi government covered it up. It’s also not the first time this has occurred.

As we reported yesterday, President Obama and his CIA Director John Brennan ignored a European CIA agent’s pleas for help and left her to rot in an Italian prison. Lucky for her, Donald Trump was elected President for which she is grateful.

The former agent, Sabrina De Sousa, was working in Milan as an undercover CIA officer in 2003 when U.S. and Italian intelligence agents abducted radical Egyptian cleric Osama Mustapha Hassan Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, and transported him to his native Egypt for interrogation. Omar was released eventuall for lack of evidence against him.

Years later, in 2008, De Sousa along with 25 other Americans, were convicted in absentia on kidnapping and other charges related to the abduction of Omar. Several were pardoned and not one did time in prison. The Italians also convicted Omar in absentia of “criminal association for the purposes of international terrorism” and sentenced him to six years in prison.

De Sousa however faced four years in an Italian prison for the abduction which she claims she was not part of. Eventually, after assistance from President Trump, her sentence was reduced and she has been able to avoid prison in Italy. President Obama and his CIA Director John Brennan left her out to dry.

De Sousa told us is that –

All the Italian government officials on trial said they could not speak because they were not allowed to do so as the government had imposed state secrets.

They were all granted immunity because…get this…their relationship with foreign Intel services was a state secret.

All the Americans were convicted.

The Italians and the Americans were involved in clandestine and illegal activities in both the 2003 in the rendition of Omar and then during the 2016 election cycle in illegally setting up the Trump campaign. (They also were involved together in 2005 when then FBI Director Robert Mueller worked with Italy to cover up each other’s actions related to the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) hoax related to Iraq.)

It looks like illegal actions between Italy and the US are being covered up again. No wonder Renzi and Obama were so close!

Sabrina De Sousa can be reached on Twitter at @Sadiso

Clinton Friend and Attorney for Judge Kavanaugh’s Accuser Christine Ford, Now Inserting Himself Into Mueller Witch Hunt

The attorney who sat by Christine Blassey Ford’s side while she slandered Judge Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing in front of the Senate is now getting inserting himself into the Mueller witch hunt.

Michael Bromwich, the former Department of Justice Inspector General under Bill Clinton, who represents the corrupt and dirty fired FBI Director Andrew McCabe, is now pushing a slanderous tale regarding for Mueller witch hunt!

According to the site Illinois Pay to Play, another phony attack on President Trump is in the works –

No, the Clinton crew never gives up. Now it appears that McCabe’s attorney, Michael R. Bromwich, has taken on the task of orchestrating the latest false narrative about Trump to be fed the public via their friends in the media.

So get ready for yet another phony attack on Trump!

Bromwich, the former Department of Justice Inspector General under Bill Clinton, has teamed up with New York Review of Books (NYR) and independent journalist Murray Waas to help pivot from the discredited Christopher Steele dossier and “Russiagate” to the Waas dossier and “Obstructiongate”.

Waas’ latest fairy tale states that Trump fired FBI Director James Comey to obstruct the “Russiagate” investigation.

But Waas’ credibility had already been destroyed years ago.

For those who don’t remember Waas he’s a blogger who was celebrated for his reporting on the Plamegate scandal even though he has since admitted his reporting on Plamegate was false, and that the whole thing was a hoax.

Bromwich recently tweeted out support for Waas’s story on his unknown site called –

The story continues –

Bromwich wants Congress to ask Mueller about the recently created Waas dossier instead of the Steele dossier.

Do you think the Democrats will oblige him? Bet on it!

Now Laurence Tribe, a Clinton apologist and strong advocate for impeaching Trump, is also on board with Waas’ unsubstantiated claims. Tribe states that Waas “makes a strong case for demanding the live public testimony of Rosenstein”.

Joining Bromwich and Tribe in spreading the Waas claim is the Democratic National Committee insider, Alexandra Chalupa, who in 2016 solicited dirt on Trump from the Ukrainian government. Chalupa had this to say: the “confidential draft letter Trump wrote confirms he fired FBI Director James Comey because he was investigating Putin’s attack on the 2016 U.S. election.”

Wow! That’s rich coming from a woman who will go to prison if a legitimate investigation is ever done.

IT’S OFFICIAL: Trump’s Two and a Half Years of Markets Already Outperform Obama’s (and Every President in History’s) Years in Office!

The DOW hit another new closing all time high today surpassing 27,300 for the first time ever!

The stock markets are major indications of an economy’s strength. They include valuations based on past and current financial data and company and market data. The markets also include expectations for the future. This is why it makes sense to measure a President’s impact on the markets from the day of the Presidential election rather than from the day of the inauguration.

Trump Economy

The US Markets have been on fire since the 2016 election because President Trump won. On November 8th, 2016, the markets closed at 18,333. Today the DOW closed at 27,332. That’s a 49% increase in the DOW since the 2016 election!

Under President Trump the DOW has increased by nearly 9,000 points since the 2016 Presidential election (8,999)! This more than any other President in history!

Here are some more Trump stock market records –

* President Trump is the only President in US history to oversee two stock market rallies of nine days or more where the DOW set new highs each and every day.

* On February 28th, 2017, President Trump matched President Reagan’s 1987 record for most continuous closing high trading days when the DOW reached a new high for its 12th day in a row!

* Then in early August of 2017 President Trump reigned over a 9 day stock market rally with each day reaching record highs.

Since the 2016 Presidential election, the DOW reached record highs an amazing 106 times.

There were more stock market highs (71) in 2017, Trump’s first year as President, than any year in history.

The fastest 500 point increase between major milestones in the DOW (i.e. between 25,500 and 26,000) occurred on January 17, 2018. The DOW increased 500 points and surpassed 26,000 for the first time ever six days after the DOW surpassed 25,500 on January 11th, 2018, for the first time.

The fastest 1000 point increase, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000 and 8000 point increases in the DOW between major milestones have all occurred since President Trump became President.

The DOW had its best day in history under President Trump. On December 26th, 2018 the DOW was up more than 1,000 points (1,086) in one day for the first time ever!

The DOW increased the most points in a single year under President Trump when it grew 4,956 points in 2017.


The story for President Obama is the near polar opposite. The markets were down by nearly 4,000 points when Obama won the election. They no doubt were going down as the markets realized early that Obama would win the 2008 election. The all time closing high before the 2008 election for the DOW was on October 9, 2007, when the DOW reach 14,165.

On election day, November 4, 2008, the markets had dipped to 9,625. Then after a few months the markets ultimately dipped by another 30% when the DOW dipped to 6,547 on March 9, 2009. The markets had literally no faith that the socialist former community organizer would help the economy.

In total in Obama’s first term (from 2009 through 2012) there were no new all time highs. The markets did recover but at a very slow pace. By the time President Trump won the election the markets had rebounded to 18,333 on November 8, 2016.

In total, from his election win to President Trump’s win the DOW had increased by 8,707 points. The DOW incurred 105 new all-time highs during Obama’s eight years in office.

And to think that the markets would be much higher for President Trump if the Fed hadn’t increased rates multiple times whenever a new market milestone was reached.

The Fed kept rates at zero percent for most of Obama’s time in office. Obama’s recovery was the worst since the Great Depression.

As soon as President Trump won the 2016 election, the Fed began to increase rates radically.

If the FED had kept rates at Obama levels we would be seeing much higher markets, a much higher GDP and a reduction in the US debt load. In spite of the Fed’s left leaning political actions to stop the great Trump economy, the economy is on fire. Trump economic team leader Larry Kudlow knows it –

Trump is right. The economy and the markets are on fire. He’s an economic record holder!

EXCLUSIVE: President Clinton Caught in Another Lie with His Epstein Response – They Did Not Fly Together for Clinton Foundation!

Former President Bill Clinton broke his silence on Monday and released a panicked statement on billionaire sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. He lied and now we know, he lied again!

Florida billionaire Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on Saturday in New York for sex trafficking of minors.

Prosecutors unsealed an indictment against Jeffrey Epstein on Monday. The court accused Epstein of sexually abusing dozens of young girls for years at one of the biggest mansions in Manhattan, paying them hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter and hundreds more if they could recruit other victims.

The fake news media immediately ignored Epstein’s connection to Bill Clinton but in reality, the Clintons partied with Epstein while Donald Trump had him kicked out of Mar-a-Lago for hitting on a teenage girl.

In Bill Clinton’s statement Monday he claimed he “knows nothing about terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida.”

Clinton admitted to taking a total of four trips on Epstein’s airplane and also admitted to visiting Epstein’s apartment in New York. This has already been debunked as a lie! The former President flew 27 times to Orgy Island and most every time his flights carried under age girls!

Full statement from Bill Clinton:

We reported in 2016 before the election that Bill Clinton took numerous trips on Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ to Epstein’s private “Orgy Island” where underage girls as young as 14 were prostituted for Epstein’s rich and famous clients like Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Prince Andrew.

Clinton’s claim that his Secret Service were with him every during every trip is bogus because according to reports he simply ditched his security detail in order to stealth travel with Epstein.

We now know that the President famous for having sexual relations with a young intern in the Oval office and being impeached for lying under oath in a sexual harassment case, lied more than once in his statement above.

According to Clinton Foundation expert Charles Ortel –

Ortel, who has a weekly show on YouTube labeled ‘Sunday with Charles‘ that focuses on the crimes committed by the Clinton Foundation, is right and he offers support.

Bill Clinton could not have flown with Epstein to perform work for the Clinton Foundation in 2002 because the Foundation was not authorized for foreign work at that time and the former President was not an officer, trustee or employee of the Foundation at that time.

The application for federal tax exemption for the main foundation was signed 23 December 1997 (see here).

The application specifically states in an addendum that all work will be carried out from within a park to be established by the City of Little Rock for a Presidential Center. In addition, it does not mark the activity code for U.S. foundation operating internationally.

The Clinton Foundation has never filed an accurate Annual Report to any government authority. It did not file a 990 for the “short period” from 23 October 1997 through 31 December 1997. No subsequent report uses the proper legal name of the entity (“The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation”) through April 2005. And no report contains a validly prepared financial audit consistent with U.S. accounting standards. In fact, such audits are missing here for years 1998 through 2004–see here:

There are more defects, but the IRS, headed by Lois Lerner from 2006 through 2013, let the “Clinton Foundation” engage in rampant fraud, which continues to this day.

According to Ortel, Bill Clinton was not a named officer or trustee/director of the parent CF until a date uncertain in 2013. He had not valid legal authority to bind the CF for any purpose, especially including unlawful and unauthorized ones.

Ortel discussed the Epstein arrest and President Clinton’s response in this past week’s Sunday with Charles show.

A “charity” that solicits monies to build a Little Rock archive and research center but travels all over the world pasha class is committing numerous crimes including “diversion”. A “charity” that sends under age females with it fake members is disgusting.

UK Bracing for Moment It Becomes Known Its Intel Spied on Innocent Americans in the US for Obama!

Yesterday’s resignation by the UK’s Ambassador to the US, Kim Darroch, is barely the beginning. Soon Americans will find out that the Brits spied on Americans in the US at the behest of Obama’s Deep State!

We reported more than a year ago that a foreign government did interfere in the US election of 2016 and that government was the UK – not Russia! These pompous pieces of work thought that Hillary would win and they would never be caught. Soon the entire story will be out and Americans will be totally outraged!

The British ambassador to the US resigned yesterday but this is only the beginning –

The British ambassador to the U.S. resigned on Wednesday, days after leaked cables that criticized President Trump escalated tensions between the two close allies.

Kim Darroch’s resignation came one day after Trump bashed him as a “very stupid guy” and “pompous fool” and his tenure became a flashpoint in the race to replace outgoing British Prime Minister Theresa May.

“Since the leak of official documents from this Embassy there has been a great deal of speculation surrounding my position and the duration of my remaining term as ambassador. I want to put an end to that speculation. The current situation is making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like,” Darroch wrote in his resignation letter, released by the U.K. Foreign Office.

Foreign Office chief Simon McDonald said he accepted Darroch’s resignation with “deep personal regret.”

President Trump tweeted after the leaked cables were released –

The British Ambassador was a nitwit in sharing such things in such an elitist manner. However, some individuals believe that the leaks were a means to soften the blow when the real crimes come out about how the UK attempted to overthrow the US election –

Rex reports on why the British Ambassador was panicking –

Put simply, Darroch’s cables exhibit sheer panic. But why is the UK ambassador melting down?

There’s an easy answer, to anyone reasonably well informed :


And a date, looming on the horizon:

24 July, 2019.

What’s being hidden from the general public is Darroch’s likely role in SpyGate, Obama & Clinton’s operation to illegally destroy the Trump Presidential campaign and rig the 2016 Presidential election.

We will get to that in a moment.

But Darroch also knows that a key date is just around the corner, when any hope of his protection from Downing Street will disappear. The date?

24 July, 2019 – the day when Theresa May steps down and a new UK Prime Minister, almost certainly Boris Johnson, takes over.

According to Rex, the Brits are busted. Their efforts to upend the US election for Obama and Clinton will soon be in the mainstream. The news is shocking –

Put simply, on Obama’s behalf the UK was spying on innocent American citizens within the UK, in particular George Papadopoulos.

They were also permitting Obama’s goons to spy on UK soil, by facilitating access, intel gathering and sharing.

That’s outrageous enough.

What many have not realized yet, however, is that the UK government was likely spying on innocent Americans, within the United States.

President Trump gave us a clue how the Royals in Great Britain handled the news that the UK’s Intel committed crimes for the Obama administration. The Queen stood for righteousness while Theresa May can’t be gone soon enough –

It’s all coming out. Grab your popcorn!

Hat tip Keating


Prosecutor in Epstein Case Said Donald Trump Was the ONLY ONE Who Helped Him

An attorney who represented the victims of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual assault said that in 2009, the only person that helped him was then citizen Donald Trump.

Prosecuting attorney Bradley Edwards was interviewed in December 2018 in Palm Beach, Florida shortly after settling a court case he had with billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.

The Palm Beach Daily News reported at that time –

The #MeToo movement may have finally caught up with billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The 65-year-old politically-connected money manager on Tuesday admitted he sued Bradley Edwards to punish the attorney for successfully representing young women who claim Epstein sexually assaulted them at his Palm Beach mansion more than a decade ago.

>>RELATED: Read Jeffrey Epstein’s full apology

Epstein’s admission, his apology and his payment of an undisclosed amount of money to Edwards brought an abrupt end to what promised to be a salacious trial minutes before it was to begin in Palm Beach County Circuit Court.

After the settlement was announced, attorney Edwards was interviewed outside the courthouse. He shared much about the case and then answered the interviewer’s question about whether Donald Trump was somehow related to the case since Epstein was a reportedly a friend of Trump (at the 5:00 mark – emphasis added) –

Question from reporter: Our current President has had relationships with Epstein in the past and there are those, Katy Johnson and maybe other victims who’ve accused Trump of being involved in things like this.

In my experience, Trump supporters will not listen to anything along those lines. Obviously we’re not in the court of law here right now, but are those claims, although that case was dropped, it was dropped before it went to court. In your opinion as a lawyer, in your experience is there anything you can say as to the validity of those claims and whether there will be anything more about that?

Edwards: Nothing at all. The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people, that I want to talk to them, is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk. I’ll give you as much time as you want. I’ll tell you what you need to know, and was very helpful, in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information. That checked out and that helped us and we didn’t have to take a deposition of him in 2009.

Reporter: Do you have any information on James Patterson’s claims that Trump had Epstein kicked out of Mar-a-logo?

Edwards: I definitely have heard that. I definitely have heard that and I don’t know if it was Trump himself as opposed to a manager…

Donald Trump knew Jeffrey Epstein. He helped prosecutors who represented victims of Epstein and he reportedly kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago.

Hat tip Lyndy

Three Years Ago FBI Director James Comey Gave His Famous Hillary Exoneration Speech

It’s now been three years since the infamous James Comey speech where he sanctimoniously exonerated Hillary Clinton of any and all crimes related to her maintenance and destruction of thousands of classified and subpoenaed emails.

A few days after Hillary was interviewed by the FBI’s corrupt investigator Peter Strzok and a week after Hillary’s husband and former President Bill Clinton met with AG Loretta Lynch on an airport tarmac, FBI Director James Comey unanimously by himself exonerated Hillary Clinton of any crimes related to her email server and destruction of subpoenaed emails.

Hillary’s actions were criminal as pointed out by Comey but he became judge and juror in not recommending an indictment –

This historic event and the biggest joke in law enforcement history is now in song –

Three years later Hillary lost the election. Comey was fired in shame. But both unfortunately still walk free after committing numerous crimes.

HERE IT IS: Our Proposed Strategy for Interviewing Mueller and a Complete Inventory of Questions to Ask!

(The following guidance comes from a career auditor involved in numerous multi-million dollar financial, operational and fraud investigations across numerous countries around the globe.)

If the Mueller presentation is only four hours long then (at most) the Republican members in the House Committees will only have around an hour and a half to question Mueller.

Because the time frame is limited, the questions must be quick and to the point.

Therefore it is recommended that all questions be framed as Yes/No questions. Providing Mueller little time to procrastinate and dilly dally in his responses. Mueller is used to going into these types of meetings and not answering questions –

Also, the questions should be risk rated with the most important addressed first while eliminating duplicated questions by the members. The House members who are able to interview Mueller should ask questions quickly while not overlapping on topics due to time limitations.

Each member should set aside some time to address suspect answers or perhaps two members should be given the time to follow up on open or unexpected questions during the questioning. For example, after a few members have asked quick questions on a Yes/No basis, have another member step in and ask follow up questions regarding topics when Mueller provides dubious answers. The same could happen with the final interviewer – used in a mop up kind of role.

It’s important to note that Mueller is not a good guy. He is not a patriot. His actions in relation to the Trump Special Counsel will go down in history as the most corrupt actions ever taken against a President of the United States. He is one of a gang of Obama and Deep State crooks who is trying to overthrow the Trump administration. They are still at it and no doubt Mueller will drop another dishonest bomb during the hearing.

Mueller should be addressed in the same manner he and his gang approached innocents like George Papadopoulos, General Mike Flynn and Paul Manafort. Manafort is in solitary confinement for underpaying his taxes and not filling of FARA forms and is awaiting more charges by the state of New York State that are repetitive of Mueller’s charges. General Flynn, an American hero, spent his life savings defending himself and still is paying attorneys. George Papadopoulos was spied on by numerous individuals before the 2016 election.

Mueller may be just a symbol but it is unlikely. He may just play dumb very well. Many believe it was his corrupt Weissmann who ran the show. If so, get this out. This is important! Hammer Weissman with similar questions the next day!

There is no time for pandering – no time to waste – this may be your only chance to get to the truth. If Mueller lies, he needs to be prosecuted. Count the number of times he says “I don’t know.” Recount this number throughout the hearing. Americans are counting on Republicans in Congress to get to the truth!

Perhaps each member could limit his/her questions to a single topic so not to duplicate questions. Below is a complete list of material questions by topic –

Mueller History

  1. You served as FBI Director from 2001 through 2013. During this time as Director the Clinton investigation into Whitewater and mishandling and destruction of records was coming to an end. Notably James Comey was involved in these investigations. Were the Clintons charged with any crimes as a result of these investigations?
  2. In his final day in office, Bill Clinton pardoned Marc Rich, a billionaire indicted for tax fraud and trading with Iran during the hostage crisis. James Comey also oversaw the investigation into President Clinton’s last minute pardons. Were any individuals charged with crimes as a result of this investigation?
  3. During your time as FBI Director you and your associate Andrew Weissmann indicted accounting firm Arthur Andersen as Powell explained “by combining two separate statutes to create a crime out of something that wasn’t.” As a result 85,000 Arthur Andersen employees lost their jobs. The US Supreme Court eventually saw this case and said “it was shocking how little criminal culpability the jury instructions had required and that Andersen had not committed a crime at the time.” Is it true that the Supreme Court unanimously overturned your case in a vote of 9 – 0?
  4. Is it true that after his work with the Arthur Andersen case that Andrew Weissmann was elevated to Director of the Enron Task Force?
  5. Is it true that Weissmann indicted four Merrill Lynch executives of 14 crimes and insisted they be sent to jail, before they could appeal and that one individual was sent to a maximum security prison, but later 12 of the 14 crimes were overturned by the appellate court, including all the crimes against the young executive who was sent to the maximum security prison?
  6. Is it true a young Enron treasurer was put in prison after the plead guilty to a crime but Andrew Weissmann wanted more from the young man who didn’t cooperate so he was placed in solitary confinement for two weeks?
  7. Is it true that according to the Brady rule that the government is legally constitutionally and ethically required to produce any evidence that is favorable to the defense that is within the government’s possession or within its reach?
  8. Is it true that the 5th Circuit found that Weissmann and his “prosecutors plainly suppressed evidence favorable to the defense” in the Merrill Lynch case?
  9. Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein is famous for flying Bill Clinton and other celebrities like Kevin Spacey, to his ‘orgy island’, where underage girls were prostituted for his clients. Epstein was later involved in a sex trafficking case and given a very light sentence. Is it true that an attorney who fought to keep the sex trafficking case under seal to protect the identity of a very heavy client, worked for you and James Comey?
  10. According to an email from the Hillary Clinton State Department, you delivered uranium to Russian officials on an airport tarmac in Europe in the fall of 2009. Is this true?

Mueller’s Personal Conflicts of Interest as Special Counsel

  1. The Special Counsel law requires that the person appointed be independent of conflicts of interest. Conflicts as you may know can be both actual and perceived. Perceived conflicts would be those that a reasonable person could see and believe there might possibly be a conflict of interest. Because your investigation addressed the President of the United States, you would expect that you and your team should be highly vetted and not have any real or perceived conflicts of interest. Did you complete and sign a form stating that you have no conflicts of interest, actual or perceived, related to the Special Counsel directive you oversaw? (If not signed, how was this confirmed and recorded?)
  2. Did you provide your conflict of interest form to Rod Rosenstein to sign and did he sign it?
  3. Was this conflict of interest form signed at the time you were appointed the Special Counsel? (If not, when was it signed?)
  4. Did you report in your signed conflict of interest form that you and President Trump had a dealing where you had a membership in a Trump golf course and you resigned your membership in an argument with the Trump owned course?
  5. Did you work for a law firm that represented Jered Kushner, the President’s son, and did you note this in your conflict of interest form?
  6. You and Rod Rosenstein oversaw vetting of the corrupt Uranium One sale which involved Russian bribes, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering. You kept the Uranium One sale hidden from Congress which no doubt would have prevented that sale from taking place. Did you report this in your conflict of interest form?
  7. The Special Counsel statute specifically prohibited you from serving if you had “a personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the investigation or prosecution.” The language is mandatory. James Comey was substantially involved in the case. Indeed, he is the central witness. You and him were former colleagues and have long been friends, allies and partners. Agents have quipped that you two were joined at the hip while at the Department of Justice and the FBI. You two had a mentor-protégé relationship. The likelihood of prejudice and favoritism is glaring and severe. Did you identify this relationship with James Comey in your conflict of interest disclosure?
  8. Did you report in your signed conflict of interest form that you met with President Trump the day before the Special Counsel in an interview for FBI Director and that you were not offered the position?

Team Conflicts of Interest

  1. Your team has more glaring conflicts of interest than perhaps even you. Did you ensure all individuals who worked for you complete and sign conflict of interest forms stating that they had no conflicts of interest related to your Special Counsel?
  2. Your lead investigator Peter Strzok, said that Hillary should beat Trump 1 million to zero, and he texted a message saying “f Trump”. He worked on the Hillary email investigation and was present at the interview with Hillary and he assisted in drafting Comey’s presentation announcing Hillary was exonerated by the FBI. He had an affair with fellow FBI employee Lisa Page and used government phones and systems to communicate with his lover, even though he was married at the time. He hated Trump. Did Mr. Strzok complete a conflict of interest form certifying he was not biased towards President Trump?
  3. Strzok communicated with Lisa Page who was also on your team and who also texted “f Trump”. They communicated that they would “stop him” meaning, candidate and President Trump. Was Ms. Page subject to a conflict of interest review and did you sign off on it?
  4. Did you have any concerns with a bias from either Peter Strzok or Lisa Page at any time that you have ever worked with them?
  5. Were you aware that your top attorney, Andrew Weissmann, whom you have worked with for decades was at the Hillary party on election night (that turned into a funeral) and did you consider this a conflict of interest that would inhibit Mr. Weissmann from working on your special counsel team?
  6. Were you aware that Mr. Weissmann and Zainab Ahmad, an individual also on your team, were both introduced to the Steele dossier long before the 2016 election according to Bruce Ohr testimony and did you not feel this indicated a conflict of interest precluding them from being on your team?
  7. Did you have concerns about conflicts of interest when you added Greg Andres to your team who donated to the Democrat party $3700 and whose wife is a judge appointed by former President Obama?
  8. Were you concerned with bias when you hired Rush Atkinson ($200), Kyle Freeny ($300),Andrew Goldstein ($3,300) and Weissmann ($3,300), all who donated to Democrats and/or the Hillary campaign?
  9. Did you think there would be conflicts with Adam Jed who defended Obama’s contraceptive mandate against the Little Sisters of the Poor or Elizabeth Prelogar who worked as a law clerk for left leaning Supreme Court judges Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan?
  10. Any concerns of a bias from Brandon Van Grack who led a grand jury inquiryin Northern Virginia scrutinizing former Trump associate Michael Flynn’s foreign lobbying?
  11. How about any concerns of a bias from Jeannie Rhee who represented Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit about her private emails, and she also represented the Clinton Foundation in a civil racketeering case that was later dismissed?
  12. Did you ask anyone on your team to recuse themselves because of bias or conflicts of interest or did you not hire anyone because of conflicts of interest?
  13. Finally, did you think at any point that DAG Rod Rosenstein should recuse himself due to actions in signing off on the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page and Donald Trump or for being involved with you in the Uranium One case where the US sold 20% of its uranium to Russia while the Clinton Foundation received millions from Russians in return?

The DNC Server

  1. Did the FBI or the Mueller Special Counsel team physically obtain the hacked DNC server hard drives? (Why hasn’t the FBI perform a forensic evaluation of the DNC hard drives?)
  2. Does the FBI maintain the DNC email server hard drives that were hacked by Russians? (Where are they located?)
  3. Does the FBI maintain a forensic copy of the DNC server hard drives? (Who has them?)
  4. Did the FBI and the Mueller team rely on the company Crowdstrike to examine and verify that the DNC server was hacked by Russians?
  5. Was the current or former CEO of Crowdstrike, Shawn Henry, promoted by you Robert Mueller, in September 2010 while at the FBI?
  6. Has any government agency attempted to locate Guccifer 2.0 who is reportedly related to the hacking of DNC emails?
  7. Was Guccifer 2.0 a government entity?
  8. Has the FBI/DOJ talked with Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai from Vice Motherboard who claims to have interviewed Guccifer 2.0 or examined his computers/network?
  9. Did the FBI ever obtain or review evidence from NSA Whistleblower and longtime intelligence analyst Bill Binney who claims that he has evidence that the DNC emails released by WikiLeaks were never hacked at all by the Russians or anyone?
  10. Julian Assange from WikiLeaks claims that Russians never gave him emails that he released from the DNC and Hillary’s campaign manager John Podesta. Did you or the FBI ever interview Julian Assange to determine how he obtained the DNC emails and who provided the emails to WikiLeaks?

Spying on the Trump Team

  1. Did you ever wear a wire or record any conversation with the Trump team at any time, especially in the White House?
  2. Did anyone you know or anyone you are aware of, wear a wire or record any conversation with the Trump team at any time, especially in the White House?
  3. Are you aware of any recording devices being left (or activated) in the White House by any member of any US government agency for the purpose of spying or listening in on the Trump team’s discussions?
  4. Are you aware of any other means where spying (or data collection) occurred of the Trump team in the White House?
  5. Are you aware of any recording devices being left in Trump Tower or any other spying that occurred, phone taps or other, by any US government agency at any time?
  6. Are you aware of any recording devices being left in Trump Tower or any other spying (or data collection) that occurred, phone taps or other, by any non-US government agency at any time?
  7. Are you aware of any time that a member of the US government, the FBI, DOJ, or any other government agency spied on the Trump Team at any time?
  8. Are you aware of any time that a member of any non-US government, the FBI, DOJ, or any other government agency spied (or collected data) on the Trump Team at any time?
  9. Are you aware of any non-US government entity that utilized government resources or databases to (collected data) on the Trump Team at any time?

The Steele Dossier

  1. Were there more than four versions of the dossier that were provided to the FBI/DOJ/State?
  2. Was Steele paid for his services and who issued the payment?
  3. What government agencies and employees and dossier related individuals (including reports) did Steele meet while in the US?
  4. Does the FBI have unreduced copies of the Steele dossier and where are they kept?
  5. Did the DOJ/FBI/State communicate with Steele via email, phone and text?
  6. Did your team communicate in any way with Christopher Steele?
  7. Did the Ukraine and their embassy provide information about Trump that may have been used in the dossier? (Who was this provided to?)
  8. The Steele dossier was used to obtain a warrant to spy on candidate Trump and Carter Page. It was the basis for the FISA warrant that was renewed three times. It was the support for connections between Trump and Russia and it was fake. Did you try and hide these facts in your report because the dossier is a fraud and a fake?
  9. When you determined that there was no collusion between the Trump team and Russia did you notify the FISA Court who had a warrant to spy on Carter Page and President Trump that was then proven based on false information?
  10. Did you investigate communications between the State Department’s Kathleen Kavalec and the FBI before the election where she stated that the Steele dossier was a fraud?

The Special Counsel Investigation

  1. The Special Counsel Law requires that a crime be investigated. Was the crime to be investigated in your Special Counsel Trump team collusion with Russia? (What specifically was the crime as one has never been declared?)
  2. The scope of the Special Counsel is supposed to be limited to the crime to be investigated but Rosenstein’s scope memo was wide open and therefore you included events long before the 2016 election and for activities that were outside of the US, is this correct?
  3. In numerous instances your investigation went outside the scope of Jeff Sessions recusal, in these instances did you obtain approval from AG Sessions to delve into these areas which were not yours to address?
  4. Did Jeff Sessions ever point out that you were going outside the mandate of his recusal?
  5. Were there additional scope memos that DAG Rosenstein provided to you other than the original one that created the special counsel investigation? (How many? What did they say and why did you keep them hidden in your report?)
  6. Was $35 million spent (wasted) on your investigation?
  7. Did you spend more than $700,000 on private contractors on the investigation?
  8. You have stated previously that you will not tell the name of the private contractors, was one of the private contractors Fusion GPS or Crowdstrike?
  9. Did you investigate the origins of the Russia collusion tale and did you identify that it was created by individuals, foreign and domestic, who set up Trump team members with the narrative of Russian collusion?
  10. Did you investigate candidate Trump’s campaign manager Paul Manafort for actions he took in the Ukraine long before the 2016 election, and was Manafort indicted as a result of your investigation?
  11. Manfort worked for John and Tony Podesta in the Ukraine. John Podesta was Hillary’s campaign manager and his brother Tony worked with Manafort in the Ukraine. Were the Podesta’s indicted as part of your investigation?
  12. Was Tony Podesta, the brother of Hillary’s campaign manager, John Podesta, given immunity as part of your investigation?
  13. All text messages on Peter Strzok and Lisa Page’s phones were deleted when it became clear that many salacious, bigoted and potential criminal acts were found in their text messages. Did you have these messages deleted or do you know who did?
  14. Were you aware of Peter Strzoka and Lisa Page’s personal relationship before hiring them on your team?
  15. Did you or any individuals in your Special Counsel team ever act illegally or take actions that were outside of department policy at any time during your time with the Special Counsel? (Here is a list of 100 times that Mueller and his gang acted illegally or against department policy)


  1. Was the appointment of the Special Counsel to determine whether the Trump team colluded with Russia during the 2016 Presidential election?
  2. Did you determine that the Trump team did not collude with Russia during the 2016 election?
  3. Were you informed that the Trump team did not or likely did not collude with Russia before you took accepted the position of Special Counsel?
  4. Did you know that the Trump team did not collude with Russia on the day that you took over the Special Counsel?
  5. Did your lead attorney that Mr. Weissmann and Zainab Ahmad, an attorney on your team, communicate with you before you took the job as Special Counsel that he saw the Steele dossier in mid-2016 and that he knew at that time that it was a phony and fake document?
  6. Did anyone else on your team communicate to you that the Steele dossier was a fraud and that there was no way that Donald Trump and his team was in any way colluding with Russia?
  7. Did you know that the Trump team was not colluding with Russia before the 2018 midterm elections? (When did you come to this conclusion?)

Mueller Report

  1. Did you eventually come to the conclusion that the Steele dossier was a fraud?
  2. Did you come to this conclusion when the FISA warrants to spy on Carter Page and President Trump were in place?
  3. Did you selectively edit the transcript of a phone call between the president’s attorney, John Dowd, and the attorney for former national security adviser Michael Flynn leaving out information that made the discussion totally legit?
  4. You cite the name Felix Sater over 100 times in your report when trying to link President Trump to Russians. Are you aware that Mr. Sater has decades old ties to the Clintons, former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch and your own Andrew Weissman?
  5. Did you note in your report that George Nader, a witness who is mentioned more than 100 times in your report, was allowed to leave the country, in spite of the fact that he was charged for possession of child pornography?
  6. You mention a 302 on General Flynn dated January 19th, 2017, three times in your report and yet this has never been provided to the public. Will you provide this to the public and explain why it has not been released?


  1. Was Simon Kukes, an American businessman who lives in the US and a Western Intel asset, a source listed in the fake Steele dossier?
  2. Was Ilya Zaslavskiy, who worked for the Chatham House and the UK spy networks, a source listed in the fake Steele dossier?
  3. Did Sergie Millian, who was reportedly a source for the dossier, live in Russia at the time of the 2016 election?
  4. Did you refer to Joseph Mifsud, the spy that met with George Papadopolous in London, as a Russian spy in your report?
  5. Is it true that Mifsud is not a Russian spy but rather a Western spy used by the Obama CIA, FBI or other US or foreign agency?
  6. Did you report that Giorgi Rtskhiladze, who was born in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia and has been a U.S. citizen since 2017, was a Russian businessman in your report?
  7. Did you in your report identify that Christopher Steele was actually employed by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska?
  8. Were any Russian sources in the Steele dossier Russians that lived in Russia at the time of the 2016 election?
  9. Did you investigate election meddling by any countries other than Russia? (Italy or the UK?)

This is a composite list but no doubt there is much more. The Mueller Witch Hunt was the most grotesque, corrupt and criminal action in US history. Much of the basis for the investigation was made up and false. This fact alone is frightening. These people in Obama’s Deep State must have gotten away with so much crime that they believed and were embolden to attempt this coup of the Trump campaign and Presidency.

The Democrats believe that they have this opportunity to interview Mueller and bring down AG Barr and President Trump. The American people are much smarter than they think. If the Republicans in the House can stand up strong and act judiciously with the time they have allotted, they can change the tone of the entire hearing by pointing out the numerous lies and criminal acts of the entire charade.

Let’s hope and pray that soon, all the perpetrators will be indicted and justice will be served.


WOW – Yesterday’s All Time Market Highs and the Best June Ever Were Predicted Six Months Ago!

The DOW hit another new closing all time high yesterday! The markets had their best June in 80 years by percent and best ever by point increase. All of this was predicted months ago!

As we reported, the month of June was the best month of June ever for the stock markets when looking at the amount of points increase in the major indices. It was the best June in 80 years when looking at the percent increase for the DOW.

Yesterday the markets reached their best close ever. The DOW closed at a record all time high of 26,966. It was the first time the DOW closed greater than 26,900 points.

The stock markets are major indications of an economy’s strength. They include valuations based on past and current financial data and company and market data. The markets also include expectations for the future.

The US Markets have been on fire since the 2016 election because President Trump won. On November 8th, 2016, the markets closed at 18,333. On July 3rd the DOW closed at 26,966. That’s a 47% increase in the DOW since the 2016 election!

Now this, one clever market group predicted the market’s recent explosion at the beginning of the year –

Recall that the Fed had stepped in October last year to squash the stock markets. The markets were at all time highs which was too much for the liberal Fed. They immediately raised rates and then did the unbelievable in raising rates again in December.

The markets tanked. In October the markets reached all time highs at 26,828. By Christmas Eve the markets had fallen to 21,792. It appeared that the Fed, totally against its mandate, was on a mission to put the US into a recession. Finally, the markets began to recover.

The markets have risen 25% since Christmas 2018! The team at Sentimen Trader were right!

Yesterday the markets reached their first new all time high for the year. The markets were like rockets set to reach the moon but curtailed by the Fed who was holding the rockets on their launch pads. The ever political Fed which kept rates at zero during the Obama years couldn’t have a billionaire businessman out perform their worshiped community organizer with no economic sense at all.

The markets would be much higher for President Trump if the Fed hadn’t increased rates multiple times whenever a new market milestone was reached.

The Fed kept rates at zero percent for most of Obama’s time in office. Obama’s recovery was the worst since the Great Depression.

As soon as President Trump won the 2016 election, the Fed began to increase rates radically.

If the FED had kept rates at Obama levels we would be seeing much higher markets, a much higher GDP and a reduction in the US debt load. In spite of the Fed’s left leaning political actions to stop the great Trump economy, the economy is on fire. Trump economic team leader Larry Kudlow knows it –

Trump is right. The economy and the markets are on fire. Some experts saw this months ago!