Archive by Author

President Trump Set for More CNN and Fake Media Take Downs


Via PJW

President Donald Trump unleashed perhaps the greatest tweet ever Sunday morning on Twitter.

Within an hour the President’s tweet had over a 100,000 retweets and the Internet and MSM were abuzz. The tweeet has nearly a half a million likes today.

Based on additional footage from President Trump’s days in the ring, we may be in store for more CNN #FNN #FraudNewsCNN tweets in the future.

Some creative individuals on the Internet have already created additional GIF’s for the President showing the President giving #FNN another beat down!

Very Fake News CNN and now Fraud News CNN never should have stepped in the ring.

Trump’s Tweet – “Beat’s the Gettysburg Address – Not Even Close”

President Donald Trump unleashed perhaps the greatest tweet ever this morning on Twitter.

Within an hour the tweet had over a 100,000 likes.

Members of the media responded.

CNN’s Jim Acosta tweeted: “Isn’t Pro Wrestling Fake?” and Donald Trump Jr replied: “Yes, just like your coverage.”

Boom!

One tweet responded that Trump’s tweet: “This beats the Gettysburg Address. Not even close.”

Another tweet states that: “Trump can control an entire news cycle with just one tweet. He commands the media – who are like dogs running to him when he whistles”

Buzzfeed – famous for pushing the fake news Russia dossier story shared CNN’s response to Trump’s tweet: “CNN calls Trump’s tweet attacking the network “a sad day… we will keep doing our jobs. He should start doing his.” (Bark, Bark)

 

Video: Far Left ‘Slate’ Defames the Gateway Pundit for Reporting Honestly About Radical Islam

A couple of weeks ago a young man from Slate visited the Gateway Pundit (GWP) and filmed him for a mini-documentary released this past Friday at the far left website Slate. The writer, Aymann Ismail, presented a typical far left image of the GWP, Jim Hoft.

In the documentary Aymann first interviews his cousin ‘Mo’ who is a gay Muslim. Mo tells a story about how his mother threw gasoline on his face and was going to set him on fire when Mo’s brother jumped in and stopped her. Mo’s mother was going to burn her son and possibly kill him for being gay. Aymann never addresses whether the police were called in or whether his aunt is now in jail. Instead, he apparently accepts his aunt’s actions as normal.

Next Aymann shows a few posts from the GWP. The posts he shows he calls “ISIS Propaganda”. It’s unknown what Aymann means by this. Aymann implies that ISIS is good and therefore any reports showing ISIS murders, torture and homosexual abuse are propaganda. Aymann then states that these posts are found on ‘alt right’ websites and therefore places the GWP in that category. He then notes that random people send him these posts and that its obvious that their purpose is to stoke “anti-Muslim hatred”.

Aymann does acknowledge that “intolerance” of homosexuals in Islam does happen and even in the US. But to state that throwing homosexual men off of buildings is ‘intolerance’ is an understatement. Aymann also does not state that Islam is the lone ‘religion’ in the world that is involved in these heinous acts. He never apologizes for radical Islamic terrorism nor does he label these actions by Islamists as murder or criminal let alone atrocious.

Aymann then introduces the GWP and states that the most “hateful’ articles he is sent are from the GWP. He states that this year the GWP’s “fear mongering made it into the White House”. He states that the GWP doesn’t notice that “he [the GWP] is the reason tolerant Muslim stories go unnoticed” and that the GWP’s work is “calculated”. Aymann finishes his discussion with the GWP by stating that the GWP is “anti-Muslim and anti-foreigner” and the GWP posts anti-Muslim stories “just to get clicks”.

Aymann next interviewed a US gay Muslim who discusses homosexuals in Islam and makes the outlandish statement, “My friend, it is OK in the Midwest, and the entire red map of America to attack and kill homosexuals”. Aymann ends with the statement that the Koran doesn’t say much about homosexuality and that anti-gay violence isn’t unique to Islam.

This article is typical left wing nonsense propagated by the far left at sites like Slate. Islam has accounted for over 31,000 deadly terror attacks since 9-11. During the month of May 1,650 people were murdered around the globe by Islamic terrorists. Muslims in America are not the victims, the people in the World Trade Centers on 9-11 were.

Islam does have a position against homosexuals:

Islam goes beyond merely disapproving of homosexuality. Sharia teaches that homosexuality is a vile form of fornication, punishable by death.

Beneath the surface, however, there are implied references to homosexual behavior in paradise, and it has been a historical part of Arab and Muslim culture.

The accusation that “it is OK in the Midwest, and the entire red map of America to attack and kill homosexuals” is blatantly false. It is not ok anywhere in the US to attack and kill homosexuals or anyone. That accusation was a lie and a way to justify the murders resulting from radical Islamic terrorism.

Finally, to state that the GWP is a calculated, click counter who doesn’t care about foreigners is just not true. The GWP is a gentle, loving, kind, considerate, honest, trustworthy and courageous man. He will not and has not posted stories that are dishonest. The GWP does not want to create Muslim hatred. The GWP stands up for those who are persecuted including Muslims in Muslim countries being murdered by Muslims.

Many Muslims are good people. Islam the ‘religion’ is the problem.

 

WaPo and CNN Up in Arms that ‘Maddog’ Mattis Delaying Obama’s Military Transgender Recruitment

President Trump’s Secretary of Defense, Jim ‘Maddog’ Mattis upset liberal elites by delaying the Obama Administration’s transgender recruitment policy for six months.

The Washington Post (WaPo) reported:

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has delayed a plan approved by the Obama administration a year ago to begin allowing transgender recruits to join the U.S. military, providing the Joint Chiefs of Staff with a six-month reprieve that they requested, the Pentagon said Friday night.

The decision was made on the eve of a deadline set a year ago by then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter. The services can now delay processing transgender recruits until Jan. 1, following another review of accession plans and providing information about how doing so will affect the military and its lethality, Mattis said in a memo. Details about that review must be provided back to Mattis by Dec. 1.

The Wapo went on to decry Maddog Mattis’s decision:

Mattis’s decision was immediately decried by advocates for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues, who already had waited through a lengthy Pentagon view process that concluded last year. Meanwhile, a high-profile opponent to transgender people serving said the decision is welcome.

The delay “makes no sense,” considering that existing transgender service members have served successfully over the last year, said Aaron Belkin, the director of the Palm Center, a think tank that has helped the Pentagon with some research on sexuality. He said it will put transgender people who want to serve in the same position as gay people who wanted to serve during the now-repealed ban on open homosexual service known as “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

‘Fake News’ CNN quoted other far left sources to denigrate the Secretary of Defense’s decision to hold off on transgender recruitment. CNN’s article provides arguments from a transgender group who state that transgender people serving in the military actually strengthen the military.

The American Military Partner Association, which advocates for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights in the military, said it was disappointed by Mattis’ decision.
“This six-month delay is disappointing because it unnecessarily delays the ability of transgender people to be open about their identity when entering the military,” the group’s president, Ashley Broadway-Mack, said in a statement. “It has been unequivocally proven that allowing qualified transgender people to serve openly strengthens our military and creates a more inclusive and diverse force. The issue has been thoroughly studied, and moving forward with this new recruitment policy is imperative in order for the military to be able to recruit the best talent our nation has to offer.”

The common everyday hardworking American no doubt is in agreement with Mattis’s action to delay transgender recruitment into the military. Based on President Obama’s track record for distorting the truth and main stream media’s track record for the same, it is highly unlikely that any reasonable study would show the transgenders will ‘strengthen the military’.

This all is nonsense and Maddog Mattis made the right call.

Winning, Winning, Winning.

Democrat State Officials Refusing to Assist with President Trump’s Voter Fraud Investigation

Democrat state officials in various states across the union are refusing to assist President Trump in his voter fraud investigation. Democrat politicians from California, Connecticut, Virginia and even Kentucky are not assisting in the President’s efforts to ensure US elections are fraud free:

Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill said in a statement that her office would provide such information “in the spirit of transparency.” But, suggesting some of the requested data would not be sharable under state law, she said she would ensure “the privacy of voters is honored by withholding protected data.” Merrill also voiced concern that state officials “have not been told precisely what the Commission is looking for.”

Virginia and California were more brazen in their response.

McAuliffe, a former Democratic National Committee chairman and longtime Clinton family ally, said, “At best this commission was set up as a pretext to validate Donald Trump’s alternative election facts, and at worst is a tool to commit large-scale voter suppression.”

The governor declared he would not “divert resources” to this.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla struck a similar chord, saying in a statement he would “not provide sensitive voter information to a commission that has already inaccurately passed judgment that millions of Californians voted illegally.”

He added, “California’s participation would only serve to legitimize the false and already debunked claims of massive voter fraud made by the President, the Vice President, and Mr. Kobach.”

Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes – a Democratic official in a state with a Republican governor – also said she does “not intend to release Kentuckians’ sensitive personal data to the federal government.”

“Kentucky will not aid a commission that is at best a waste of taxpayer money and at worst an attempt to legitimize voter suppression efforts across the country,” she said in a statement.

The officials preventing the President from ensuring the integrity of the election are no doubt the same individuals who claim the President’s accusations of voter fraud are not true.

The Gateway Pundit reported that in Detroit, Michigan, 37% of the precincts had fraudulent voting practices which were uncovered during Hillary Clinton’s recounts requested by Jill Stein. We also reported on a massive voter fraud incident in Nevada where half of the 19,000 votes in one district alone were determined to be fraudulent. Other instances in Detroit were identified during the recounts.

A study from the state of Kansas also found that there are over 7 million voter registrations that appear in two states simultaneously.

The states not providing for the President’s review are most likely guilty of allowing individuals to vote who are not eligible (e.g. illegal aliens, dead people, felons, or people from other states) or guilty of providing for other forms of Democrat voter fraud.

 

Video: Mika Brzezinski Has a Hidden Crush for President Trump

It’s now being reported that Mika Brzezinski has a hidden crush for President Trump.

In video from prior episodes of the ‘Morning Joe’ Show, Mika is pictured flirting with then citizen Trump. The future President said to Mika after she commented on his speech at CPAC that he was “pretty good”:

What do you mean pretty good? You know you loved it!

Mika blushed.

Other video shows Mika all over President Trump at other times when the future President joined the morning show. .

If Mika does have a secret crush on the President she must be heartbroken from his recent tweets.

President Trump tweeted on Thursday the following two tweets on Twitter:

I heard poorly rated @Morning_Joe speaks badly of me (don’t watch anymore). Then how come low I.Q. Crazy Mika, along with Psycho Joe, came..

The President’s second tweet said the following:

…to Mar-a-Lago 3 nights in a row around New Year’s Eve, and insisted on joining me. She was bleeding badly from a face-lift. I said no!

Since 1997 Handover Communist Chinese Allow Hong Kong to Prosper While US Democrats Destroy Major US Cities

Hong Kong continues to incur record surpluses 20 years after the handover of Hong Kong to Communist China.

Meanwhile, in the same period major US Cities led by Democrats face bankruptcies, murder rates that rival war zones and massive illegal alien population growth.

(Chicago picture from Insider Chicago article of Chicago’s most dangerous neighborhoods – and a recent photo of Hong Kong, China)

Chinese Communists Allowed Hong Kong to Prosper

This Saturday, July 1st, will mark the 20th anniversary of the British handover of Hong Kong in 1997 to Communist China. The peaceful handover occurred after 150 years of British rule over the colony. China first ceded Hong Kong to the British after the First Opium War in 1842. Then in 1898 China leased the New Territories together with 235 islands (collectively referred to as Hong Kong) to the British for 99 years starting on July 1st.

As the 99 year lease expiration approached in 1997 the British decided not to renew their lease and handed Hong Kong back over to China. The British worked to influence the post handover government and China eventually agreed to the “one country, two systems” approach to Hong Kong after the hand over. The Communist Chinese recognized the crown jewel it had in Hong Kong and allowed the metropolis to continue with its economic and social systems present at the time. The Chinese Communists fell far short for providing for universal suffrage but they did decide for the most part to leave the economy and social policies alone.

Today Hong Kong is recognized as a separate country in most country classifications because of the “one country, two systems” approach by the Communist Chinese. Hong Kong has a budget surplus nearly every year. This is in spite of the country providing basically free health care to all its citizens and proving free housing for 30% of its population. Hong Kong is rated number one in the world with the world’s freest economy and Hong Kong is known as the financial center of Asia.

US Democrats’ Actions with US Cities are the Polar Opposite

Two years ago Moody’s Investors Service downgraded Chicago’s debt to junk status, now politicians in Chicago are arguing that maybe bankruptcy is not such a bad thing. Chicago currently faces $25 billion in pension promises that it cannot pay.

Chicago is not the only Democrat led US city that is facing bankruptcy and a number of Democrat led cities have actually gone through bankruptcies.

Since 2010 a total of nine municipalities have filed for bankruptcy protection—which is on top of an additional 42 utilities, water districts, hospitals and other municipal agencies that have actually gone full-fledged bankrupt, according to a study from Governing.com.

Some of the larger municipalities that were forced to file for Chapter 9 were the cities of Stockton and San Bernardino in California, Central Falls in Rhode Island, the Pennsylvania state capital Harrisburg, and the largest metropolitan area on the list – Detroit, Michigan.

Many of the Democrat cities are sanctuary cities and that allow illegal aliens in their cities yet at the same time face horrible financial results.

Chicago and many of these cities also face horribly high murder rate: “With more than 760 murders last year [2016], Chicago tallied more killings than New York City and Los Angeles combined. It was the highest murder toll for the city in nearly two decades.”

The common element among these cities is that they have been run by Democrats for years. Chicago is basically under a one-party rule because the last Republican mayor of Chicago left office in 1931. The city and others are famous for Democrat charlatans who thrive on corruption.

Comparison of Hong Kong to US Democrat Led Cities

Hong Kong is roughly the same size as Chicago reporting 7.3 million inhabitants with Chicago reporting 9.8 million. However, one of these cities is rampaged with crime, insolvency and terrible management. It doesn’t take long for the casual observer to see that Hong Kong is thriving while Chicago is in despair. The sad fact is that many US cities are similar to Chicago in that they are in sorry financial shape and they incur significantly high crime rates.

Hong Kong shows that large cities can prosper and have surpluses while taking care of their citizenry.

The Communist Chinese show that capitalism works as exemplified by their policies and actions with Hong Kong since 1997, while Liberals in Chicago show through their policies and actions that they believe communism is the answer.

It’s ironic that Communists in China know better than the American Democrat Party that to ensure prosperity and stability, the less the government does to impede capitalism the better.

Video: Susan Rice Caught in Another Lie – Only 4 – Not 17 – Agencies Agreed on Russia Hacking Assessment

The Obama Administration’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice is caught in another lie!

Rice is famous for sharing on numerous main stream media (MSM) outlets that the attack and murder of four Americans in Benghazi was the direct result of a video. This was a lie.

Obama’s Rice is now guilty of another significant lie. This time it is about the the fake Russia story.

Today the New York Times quietly issued a correction about their claims that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies agreed that the Russians ‘hacked’ the 2016 presidential election. The REAL number is only 4 agencies held such views.

The New York Times finally admitted that the story that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies concurred on the assessment of Russian hacking of Democratic emails – is false.

The Times’ released a White House Memo on June 25, where correspondent Maggie Haberman mocked Trump for “still refus[ing] to acknowledge a basic fact agreed upon by 17 American intelligence agencies that he now oversees: Russia orchestrated the attacks, and did it to help get him elected.”

On Thursday, the Times appended a correction to a June 25 article that had repeated the false claim, which has been used by Democrats and the mainstream media for months to brush aside any doubts about the foundation of the Russia-gate scandal and portray President Trump as delusional for doubting what all 17 intelligence agencies supposedly knew to be true.

However, on Thursday, the Times – while leaving most of Haberman’s ridicule of Trump in place – noted in a correction that the relevant intelligence “assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.”

Susan Rice reported on MSNBC that all 17 agencies came together on the Russia assessment.

(see the video below at the 14:44 mark)

 

Rice promoted another lie for the Obama Administration.

Hat tip Still Winning

 

Google Fined with Record €2.4bn by EU over Search Engine Results – US Anti-Conservative Results Should be Investigated Next

Google was fined a record €2.4bn by EU over search engine results in the EU.

The European Union has handed Google a record-breaking €2.42bn (£2.14bn) fine for abusing its dominance of the search engine market in building its online shopping service, in a dramatic decision that has far-reaching implications for the company.

By artificially and illegally promoting its own price comparison service in searches, Google denied both its consumers real choice and rival firms the ability to compete on a level playing field, European regulators said.

The Silicon Valley giant has 90 days to stop its illegal activities and explain how it will reform its ways or face fines of up to €10.6m a day, which equates to 5% of the average daily worldwide turnover of its parent company Alphabet.

The ruling in the EU was certainly excessive but not unexpected based on Google’s actions in the US. Google search results on political related topics are always anti-conservative with the first page or two for most any searches showing only results from liberal media outlets with liberal leaning material.

A search of “Trump Russia” on Google shows the first two results from CNN, the next post was from the Guardian – all the results on the first page of results are from far left websites.

A search for “Trump Healthcare” shows the first two stories again from CNN, then the New York Times, then CNBC, etc. Again, all left wing websites are listed on the first page of the search.

Google’s search results should be investigated by the FCC. They are blatantly biased results that favor liberal websites over conservative sites and therefore liberal points of view over conservative. Perhaps the FCC should fine Google $3B to ensure they refine their searches to provide equal search results for conservatives as they do liberals.

When Comparing Hong Kong to Chicago It’s Clear – Communist Chinese Bigger Capitalists than US Liberals

(Chicago picture from Insider Chicago article of Chicago’s most dangerous neighborhoods)

Hong Kong

This Saturday, July 1st, will mark the 20th anniversary of the British handover of Hong Kong in 1997 to Communist China. The peaceful handover occurred after 150 years of British rule over the colony. China first ceded Hong Kong to the British after the First Opium War in 1842. Then in 1898 China leased the New Territories together with 235 islands (collectively referred to as Hong Kong) to the British for 99 years starting on July 1st.

The British rule over Hong Kong lasted through World War II. Few Americans realize that Hong Kong was bombed by the Japanese on the same day as Pearl Harbor. Eventually the Japanese surrendered to the US and Hong Kong was set free after five years of brutal Japanese rule. A few years later many Chinese fled to Hong Kong to escape the Communist takeover of China.

As the 99 year lease expiration approached in 1997 the British decided not to renew their lease and therefore hand Hong Kong back over to China. The British worked to influence the post handover government and China eventually agreed to the “one country, two systems” approach to Hong Kong after the hand over. The Communist Chinese recognized the crown jewel it had in Hong Kong and decided to step back in many ways from taking over total control of the economic and government systems present in Hong Kong. The Chinese Communists fell far short for providing for universal suffrage but they did decide for the most part to leave the economy and social policies alone.

Today Hong Kong is recognized as a separate country in most country classifications because of the “one country, two systems” approach by the Communist Chinese. Hong Kong has a budget surplus nearly every year. This is in spite of the country providing basically free health care to all its citizens and proving free housing for 30% of its population. Hong Kong is rated number one in the world with the world’s freest economy and Hong Kong is known as the financial center of Asia.

Chicago is a different story

Two years ago Moody’s Investors Service downgraded Chicago’s debt to junk status, the decision equated to a 5% chance of Chicago defaulting on its bond obligations in the next three years, meaning bondholders wouldn’t get back all they have lent the city. At that time Chicago’s far left newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, reported that Chicago wasn’t Detroit and it wasn’t going bankrupt. Now politicians in Chicago are arguing that maybe bankruptcy is not such a bad thing. Chicago currently faces $25 billion in pension promises that it cannot pay.

Chicago also faces a horrible murder rate:

With more than 760 murders last year [2016], Chicago tallied more killings than New York City and Los Angeles combined. It was the highest murder toll for the city in nearly two decades.

Members of the main stream media (MSM) who have reported on the problems in Chicago rarely, if ever, point out that the city has been run by the Democrat Party for nearly a century. Chicago is basically under a one-party rule because the last Republican mayor of Chicago left office in 1931. The city is famous for Democrat charlatans who thrive on corruption and the problems it engenders.

By late 2016 police morale was very low. Actions by President Obama to support hate group ‘Black Lives Matter’ promoted violence against police. As reported at that time:

Chicago is in the process of surrendering to its gangs, all because too many people, including President Obama, cling to the childish fantasy that crime would disappear if only the cops were nicer.

Comparison of Hong Kong and Chicago

Chicago and Hong Kong are roughly the same size with the Chicago area reporting 9.8 million inhabitants and the Hong Kong area reporting 7.3 million. However, one of these cities is rampaged with crime, insolvency and terrible management. It doesn’t take long for the casual observer to see that Hong Kong is thriving while Chicago is in despair. It is also apparent that the Communist Chinese have done a much better job of managing Hong Kong when compared to the Liberals in Chicago.

The Communist Chinese show that capitalism works as exemplified by their policies and actions with Hong Kong since 1997, while Liberals in Chicago show through their policies and actions that they believe communism is the answer.

It’s ironic that Communists in China know better than US Liberal Democrats that to ensure prosperity and stability, the less the government does to impede capitalism the better.